# Third-Party Manager Scorecard Review

> Owner-oversight review of third-party property manager performance. Scores against the PMA's service standards and the overlay's rubric, computes adherence metrics, flags audit findings, produces the scorecard memo and the TPM-facing communication draft. Runs monthly per property and quarterly per PMA. Material performance gaps and any PMA amendment or termination are gated.

- Skill: `mariourquia/third-party-manager-scorecard-review` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 5 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add mariourquia/third-party-manager-scorecard-review`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/mariourquia/third-party-manager-scorecard-review/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Security
- Author: mariourquia (https://skillmd.com/u/mariourquia)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/mariourquia/third-party-manager-scorecard-review

---


# Third-Party Manager Scorecard Review

## Workflow purpose

Hold the third-party manager accountable with a defensible, data-driven scorecard anchored to the PMA and the operating outcomes the owner expects. Surface material performance gaps early so remediation is an ordinary conversation rather than a rupture. Ensure every audit finding is tracked to resolution. Route PMA amendment or termination through the correct approval path.

This pack is flagship-depth. It is where ownership's oversight layer converts a TPM's operating output into an ownership-grade judgment. It is also where PMA integrity lives: service standards, reporting cadence, data quality, approval responsiveness, and audit posture.

## Trigger conditions

- **Explicit:** "TPM scorecard", "third-party manager review", "PMA performance review", "owner-oversight review", "TPM quarterly scorecard".
- **Implicit:** month close with TPM-submitted report; audit finding opened; TPM requests approval beyond overlay band; performance metric drift; PMA anniversary approaching; TPM reporting lapse.
- **Recurring:** monthly per property for tactical scorecard; quarterly per PMA for strategic review.

## Inputs (required / optional)

| Input | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| TPM-submitted owner report | report | required | monthly |
| Property monthly operating reviews | packs | required | from `workflows/monthly_property_operating_review` |
| Asset management reviews | packs | required | from `workflows/monthly_asset_management_review` |
| PMA terms overlay | yaml | required | service standards, SLAs, reporting requirements |
| Scorecard rubric overlay | yaml | required | weights |
| Audit findings log | table | required | open and closed |
| Approval request ledger | table | required | for TPM-initiated requests and owner response times |
| Market benchmarks | csv | required | for relative performance |

## Outputs

| Output | Type | Shape |
|---|---|---|
| TPM scorecard | `scorecard` | per rubric dimension, per asset, composite |
| Material gap memo | `memo` | where and why; remediation path |
| Audit follow-up list | `checklist` | by severity and age |
| TPM-facing communication | `email_draft` | `draft_for_review`; tone per overlay |
| Remediation action plan | `checklist` | owner-side and TPM-side items |
| PMA-review output (quarterly) | `memo` | anniversary-aligned |
| Approval request bundle | list | for material performance action, PMA amendment |

## Required context

Asset_class, segment, management_mode, market, pma_id, loan context (if covenant impact).

## Process

### Step 1. Inherit property and asset outputs.

Pull each TPM-managed property's monthly operating review and the corresponding asset management review. Both are inputs; the scorecard consumes, does not recompute.

### Step 2. Report timeliness and data quality.

- `report_timeliness`: share of required reports delivered on or before PMA due date.
- `kpi_completeness`: share of PMA-required KPIs populated.
- `variance_explanation_completeness`: share of material variances with explanations.

Each dimension scored per rubric overlay; missing or late reports are material gaps.

### Step 3. Operating performance.

- Property-level performance vs. market benchmark: `tpm_collections_performance`, `tpm_turn_performance`.
- `budget_adherence_tpm` vs. controllable lines.
- `service_level_adherence` against PMA SLAs (response times, lead times, entry-notice compliance).
- `staffing_vacancy_rate_tpm` against PMA-approved roster.

### Step 4. Oversight responsiveness.

- `approval_response_time_tpm`: median days from TPM approval request to owner decision. This scorecard is bidirectional — owner-side delays show up here too. Owner-side median above overlay threshold flags owner-process review.

### Step 5. Audit posture.

- `audit_issue_count_and_severity`: open audit findings by severity; age of oldest critical finding.
- Any critical finding open beyond overlay window is a scorecard red.
- Fair-housing or compliance findings route per row 3 automatically and are surfaced in the scorecard without revealing confidential details.

### Step 6. Scorecard composition.

Apply rubric weights; compute composite score per asset and per PMA. Surface top drivers up and down. Track trend over trailing 6 and 12 months.

### Step 7. Material gap identification (decision point).

- **Yellow:** one dimension below rubric band for one period; remediation plan requested, no approval.
- **Orange:** two dimensions below rubric band, or one dimension below for two consecutive periods; remediation plan with explicit owner-side actions; `approval_request` for material action (overlay-governed; typically asset_manager + portfolio_manager).
- **Red:** three or more dimensions below rubric band or any critical audit finding beyond window; `approval_request` row 19 path opens for PMA amendment or termination consideration with legal.

### Step 8. TPM-facing communication.

Produce the communication draft with overlay tone and clear asks. `draft_for_review`. Never sent without owner-side approval.

### Step 9. Quarterly PMA review.

At quarter end, produce the PMA-anniversary-aligned review with strategic view: PMA term, market context, contracted fees vs. performance, term and amendment history.

### Step 10. Confidence banner.

Every reference cited with `as_of_date` and `status`. PMA-specific overlay `as_of_date` surfaced.

### Branches

- If the scorecard reveals a fair-housing or compliance finding in the TPM's operations: route immediately per row 3; the scorecard memo notes the flag but does not detail; counsel leads.
- If the scorecard implies PMA fee structure misalignment: route as separate evaluation; do not bundle with operational remediation.
- If the scorecard is red for two consecutive months: escalate to executive review; portfolio_manager + asset_manager + legal path opens row 19 for possible PMA change.
- If the TPM is in the middle of a market-wide operating shock (e.g., a hurricane) that distorts metrics: note context, discount a dimension with explicit rationale, and consult overlay for force-majeure treatment.

## Metrics used

`report_timeliness`, `kpi_completeness`, `variance_explanation_completeness`, `budget_adherence_tpm`, `staffing_vacancy_rate_tpm`, `tpm_collections_performance`, `tpm_turn_performance`, `service_level_adherence`, `approval_response_time_tpm`, `audit_issue_count_and_severity`.

## Reference files used

- `reference/derived/role_kpi_targets.csv`
- `reference/normalized/collections_benchmarks__{region}_mf.csv`
- `reference/normalized/turn_benchmarks__{market}.csv`
- `reference/normalized/tpm_scorecard_rubric__{org}.yaml`
- `reference/normalized/pma_terms__{pma_id}.yaml`
- `reference/normalized/approval_threshold_defaults.csv`

## Escalation points

- Yellow: remediation plan requested; no approval.
- Orange: `approval_request` per overlay for material action.
- Red or critical audit beyond window: row 19 for PMA amendment/termination consideration; legal involved.
- Fair-housing / compliance finding: row 3 (counsel-led).
- Owner-side delay signal (`approval_response_time_tpm`): owner-process review.

## Required approvals

- Material performance-gap action (overlay-defined).
- PMA amendment or termination (row 19).
- Any public-facing response to audit/compliance finding (row 3).

## Failure modes

1. Scorecard without PMA basis. Fix: PMA overlay required.
2. Absolute metrics without market benchmark. Fix: benchmarks mandatory for relative context.
3. Ignoring owner-side response times. Fix: `approval_response_time_tpm` bidirectional; owner-side flagged.
4. Private audit detail leaked in TPM-facing draft. Fix: scorecard notes flag, counsel handles communications.
5. Seasonal distortions unadjusted. Fix: overlay governs seasonal adjustment.
6. PMA amendment proposed without legal. Fix: row 19 required.
7. Sample data as authoritative. Fix: confidence banner.

## Edge cases

- **TPM managing in multiple markets:** asset-level scorecards rolled to PMA-level for quarterly review; variance by market surfaced.
- **New PMA (first 3-6 months):** rubric adjustments per overlay; ramp period defined.
- **PMA with incentive structure:** tie scorecard dimensions to incentive KPIs per PMA; scorecard note explicit.
- **PMA renewal approaching:** strategic review inputs to renewal decision; routes via `workflows/owner_approval_routing` if renewal decision needed.
- **TPM bought by another operator (M&A):** scorecard pauses auto-actions; legal review.

## Example invocations

1. "Run the monthly TPM scorecard for our Charlotte portfolio."
2. "Quarterly PMA review for PMA X; include strategic view."
3. "TPM Y missed report three times this quarter. Build the scorecard and the remediation plan."

## Example outputs

### Output — Monthly TPM scorecard (abridged, Charlotte portfolio, March 2026)

**Report timeliness.** `report_timeliness` within band for the quarter.

**Data quality.** `kpi_completeness` and `variance_explanation_completeness` within band.

**Operating performance.** `tpm_collections_performance` within band at benchmark. `tpm_turn_performance` slightly above benchmark (slower turns); yellow. `budget_adherence_tpm` within band.

**Service levels.** `service_level_adherence` within band.

**Staffing.** `staffing_vacancy_rate_tpm` one position above overlay threshold at one asset; yellow.

**Oversight responsiveness.** `approval_response_time_tpm` median within band. Owner-side responsiveness within band.

**Audit posture.** `audit_issue_count_and_severity` two low findings, no critical; both within overlay window.

**Composite.** Two yellows; overall within acceptable band. Remediation plan requested.

**TPM-facing communication.** `draft_for_review`; asks scoped to the two yellow dimensions.

**Approvals.** None this period. Remediation plan is an owner ask, not an approval.

**Confidence banner.** `tpm_scorecard_rubric__{org}@2026-03-31, status=starter`. `pma_terms__pma_charlotte_mf@2026-03-31, status=sample (PMA overlay pending PMA redline)`. `turn_benchmarks__charlotte@2026-03-31, status=starter`. `collections_benchmarks__southeast_mf@2026-02-28, status=starter`.

### Output — Quarterly PMA review (abridged, PMA X, Q1 2026)

**Strategic view.** Composite trend across trailing 6 and 12 months.

**Operating performance.** Per-asset contributions; one asset carrying a yellow for two consecutive quarters.

**PMA term and fees.** Term X years remaining; fee structure aligned with overlay.

**Recommendation.** Continue; adopt a formal remediation plan on the persistent yellow asset. No PMA amendment this quarter.

**Confidence banner.** References surfaced.