# Market Recon

> The live fieldwork layer for psycho-logic — go look at the actual target market NOW instead of reasoning from your training-data stereotype of it. Use when a psycho-logic move needs grounding in a specific place: the user asks 'what do competitors in [region/country] actually do', 'what's the real price band / norm here', 'how do local leaders position themselves', 'research this market before we localise', 'what signals trust to buyers in X', or is about to launch/adapt in a market you haven't studied. Runs structured web research in the local language — local competitors and their signals, price bands, category conventions, review/trust sources, local terminology, taboos and regulations — and synthesises a compact perception profile the four moves consume. Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic; pair with cultural-context (the lens that tells you what to look for). 日本語・中文の相談（「現地の実態を調べて」「调研当地市场」）にも使う。

- Skill: `meikocho1/market-recon` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 2 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add meikocho1/market-recon`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/meikocho1/market-recon/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Research & Search
- Author: meikocho1 (https://skillmd.com/u/meikocho1)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/meikocho1/market-recon

---


# Market Recon — go look, don't assume

**cultural-context** gives you hypotheses about how a market thinks. This skill checks them against reality by going and looking — because your model's idea of "the German funeral market" or "how Thai buyers judge premium" is a stale average, and the cheap edge is in the specifics only local sources show. Stated stereotype is as unreliable as stated preference: gather revealed, current, sourced data.

## The principle

Perception is local *and* current, so it has to be observed, not recalled. Two failure modes to avoid:

- **Reasoning from the stereotype.** "Japanese buyers value quality" is true and useless — it doesn't tell you what *this* category's leaders actually signal, or what the price band is this year. Go find the specifics.
- **Reading the market in the wrong language.** English-language summaries of a non-English market are a translation of a translation. Search in the local language, read local sources, note the words locals actually use.

## What to gather (the recon checklist)

Aim each search at a lever the moves will pull:

- **Local players & positioning** — who leads this category *in this place*, how they describe themselves, what promise they lead with. (feeds reframing)
- **Price band & framing** — the real range, and *how* price is shown (per-day, all-in, tiered, hidden until contact). (feeds reframing)
- **Trust signals in use** — guarantees, certifications, longevity claims, awards, the local proof-of-credibility everyone leans on. (feeds costly-signaling)
- **Trust locus & reviews** — where buyers actually check: which review platforms, forums, associations, or personal/institutional channels. (feeds costly-signaling)
- **Category conventions & taboos** — the unwritten "you must / you never" of this category here, plus regulations and sacredness lines. (constrains every move)
- **Felt-moment pain points** — what local buyers complain about in the journey (found in reviews, forums, complaints). (feeds experience-design)
- **Local terminology** — the exact words buyers and sellers use, for copy that sounds native rather than translated.

## How to apply

1. **Fix the target.** Market = place (country / region / urban-rural) × segment × category. The narrower, the more useful the recon.
2. **Pull the hypotheses from cultural-context** so you know which dials to verify, not just collect trivia.
3. **Run structured web searches, in the local language.** Use the web tools (WebSearch / WebFetch — load via ToolSearch if not already available). Query local competitors, price pages, review sites, forums, trade/association pages, and regulator pages. Read local-language sources directly.
4. **Synthesise a perception profile**, not a link dump: for this market — what signals *trust*, what "premium" and "cheap" look like, the anchors on offer, the felt-moment pains, the taboos, and the native vocabulary. A page, sourced.
5. **Stamp recency and cite sources.** Note the date of each key fact and flag what's uncertain. Anything still a hypothesis goes to **counterintuitive-tests** for a cheap behavioural check before you bet on it.
6. **Hand the profile to the moves.** reframing / costly-signaling / experience-design now run on local reality, not a guess.

## 日本語の使用例

- 「海外(または国内の別地域)で展開したいが、現地の実態を知らない」→ 記憶や一般論で組み立てず、**現地語でWeb調査**。現地の主要プレイヤー・価格帯・保証や資格などの信頼シグナル・レビューの見られ方を集め、"知覚プロファイル" に落とす。
- 「競合と横並びで差別化できない」→ まず**実際の競合が何をシグナルしているか**を現地情報で棚卸し。空白のポジション（誰も出していない正直な弱点開示・全部込み価格など）が見えてから reframing / costly-signaling に渡す。
- 「現地の相場観がわからない」→ 価格の"範囲"だけでなく**見せ方**（1日あたり/総額/段階/問い合わせまで非表示）まで調べる。価格フレームは市場ごとに違う。
- 葬儀/シニア領域：関東/関西など**地域単位で慣習と相場が違う**。地域の葬儀社の打ち出し、口コミ・紹介・寺や地域評判といった信頼の所在、遺族の不満（journey の痛点）を現地ソースで集め、experience-design と costly-signaling の材料にする。タブー・法規制（表示や許認可）も必ず確認。

## Cross-check against the canon

Sanity-check recon findings against these; if one contradicts your read, name it and justify it.

- **Paul Samuelson, revealed preference** — weight what local players *do* (their pages, prices, signals) over what anyone says about the market.
- **Steve Blank, "get out of the building"** — the customer-development canon for the same instruction: facts live outside your assumptions.
- **Kahneman, WYSIATI ("what you see is all there is")** — the bias this skill exists to counter: a confident market picture built from the few sources you happened to see. Stamp recency, cite sources, flag gaps.

## Related skills

- **cultural-context** — the lens that tells you *which* dials to verify here; run it first
- **psycho-logic** — the router; recon grounds its moves in the real target market
- **counterintuitive-tests** — turn recon's remaining hypotheses into cheap behavioural tests
- **reframing / costly-signaling / experience-design** — consume the perception profile this produces