# Policy And Managed Settings

> Use whenever adding, modifying, or reviewing any Copilot, agent, LLM, AI, tool, permission, sandbox, MCP, model, telemetry, feature-gate, setting, configuration, or enterprise control—especially anything an organization or administrator may need to manage. Start here to decide whether it belongs in runtime managed settings, a typed SDK contract, VS Code configuration policy, extension policy, or a split implementation. Run on every new Copilot/agent/LLM control and ANY change that adds a `policy:` field.

- Skill: `minhuw/policy-and-managed-settings` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 7 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add minhuw/policy-and-managed-settings`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/minhuw/policy-and-managed-settings/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: AI & ML
- Author: minhuw (https://skillmd.com/u/minhuw)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/minhuw/policy-and-managed-settings

---


# Adding an Enterprise Policy

Choose the policy destination by **where the governed behavior is implemented**, not by
which team requested it. Most controls for Copilot agent behavior belong in the
SDK/runtime rather than VS Code.

```mermaid
flowchart TD
	A[Enterprise control] --> P{Existing permission policy<br/>introduced before VS Code 1.133.0?}
	P -->|Yes| L[Pre-1.133 compatibility migration]
	P -->|No| B{Where is the governed behavior implemented?}

	B -->|Copilot runtime, tools, MCP,<br/>sandbox, or agent loop| R[SDK/runtime managed setting]
	B -->|VS Code editor or workbench| V[VS Code configuration policy]
	B -->|Extension-provided setting| E[Extension policy]
	B -->|Independent runtime and editor behavior| M[Split runtime/editor control]
```

Follow the matching guide:

- [SDK/runtime managed setting](./sdk-runtime-policy.md)
- [VS Code configuration policy](./vscode-policy.md)
- [Extension-provided setting](./extension-policy.md)
- [Split runtime/editor control](./mixed-policy.md)
- [Pre-1.133 permission-policy migration](./legacy-permission-policy.md)

General rules:

- Runtime enforcement is authoritative for behavior executed inside the runtime.
- Do not duplicate a runtime parser, matcher, or security decision in VS Code.
- A VS Code policy is appropriate only for editor/workbench-owned behavior.
- New Copilot enterprise controls should target the shared managed-settings/SDK model.
- The VS Code settings-to-managed-settings bridge is a compatibility path for legacy
  settings only. Do not add a new VS Code setting in order to bridge it; define new
  runtime-owned controls directly in the managed-settings/SDK contract. A temporary,
  false-by-default compatibility gate for the bridge itself is allowed; it is not a
  runtime control and must not become a template for new mapped settings.
- Run `npm run export-policy-data` for every VS Code or extension policy change. Never
  edit `build/lib/policies/policyData.jsonc` manually.

## Deprecated and Historical Channels

Some policy channels remain supported for existing controls but are closed to new
properties:

- **GitHub token/account policy data** (`IPolicyData` fields consumed by
  `AccountPolicyService`) is deprecated for new controls. Do not add new entitlement or
  policy properties from the GitHub token. Existing fields remain for compatibility.
- New Copilot enterprise controls use managed settings and runtime/SDK enforcement.
- Pre-1.133 permission-policy translation is a bounded migration, not a reusable channel.

When another channel is deprecated, record the boundary here and keep implementation
details in the relevant destination guide.

Supporting references:

- [GitHub Copilot managed settings](./github-managed-settings.md)
- [Local policy testing](./local-testing.md)

Keep these guides contract-focused. Document contributor decisions and behavioral
invariants; point to source rather than copying implementation that will drift.

Trust executable source and tests over planning documents.