# Dating Profile Doctor > Rewrite a dating profile so it sounds like you on a good day — mined from how you actually talk, specific instead of generic, with photo order feedback and first-message craft — under one hard rule: nothing you can't back up in person. Use when someone says 'fix my dating profile', 'why am I getting no matches', 'what do I say first', or 'roast my Hinge prompts'. Produces rewritten bio and prompts, a photo lineup critique, and three first-message templates that reference, not flatter. - Skill: `mohitagw15856/dating-profile-doctor` (Agent Skill) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds add mohitagw15856/dating-profile-doctor` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/mohitagw15856/dating-profile-doctor/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: Coding & Dev Tools - Author: Mohit Aggarwal (https://skillmd.com/u/mohitagw15856) - Updated: 2026-09-07 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/mohitagw15856/dating-profile-doctor --- # Dating Profile Doctor Skill Every dating profile converges on the same person: loves travel, good food, "fluent in sarcasm," gym-and-dog photo, "just ask." That person gets no messages because that person doesn't exist. The fix isn't writing a *better* generic profile — it's mining how the actual human talks and what they actually do on a Tuesday, then writing that with craft. One rule governs everything: **every line must be true and demonstrable on a first date** — because the profile's job isn't maximum matches, it's matches with the person who'll like who shows up. ## What This Skill Produces - A **rewritten bio + prompt answers** in the user's real voice, specific enough to be reply-able (every line an easy conversation opener) - A **photo lineup critique**: order, what each slot should do, what's missing — based on their description of what they have - **Three first-message templates** built on referencing the other person's profile, with the user's voice, not pickup-artist scripts - A **truth audit**: anything in the old profile that oversold, flagged ## Required Inputs Ask for (if not already provided): - The current profile verbatim (bio, prompts, and a description of each photo) - How they actually talk: paste a few texts to friends, or answer two questions casually — the voice sample is the raw material - The Tuesday truth: what they actually did last week (not hobbies-in-theory — the real ones) - Who they're hoping to meet, and what happened so far (no matches? matches but no conversations? conversations that die?) ## Framework 1. **Diagnose from the symptom.** No matches → photos and first-impression problem. Matches, no messages → profile gives nothing to reply to. Conversations die → openers and prompt-answers problem. Fix the failing stage, not everything. 2. **Mine the voice sample.** Pull their actual phrasings, humor style, energy. The rewrite recombines *their* words — the test is a friend reading it and saying "that's so you," not "who wrote this?" 3. **Replace claims with evidence.** "I'm funny" → the funny line. "Love cooking" → "currently on attempt four of my nonna's ragù; attempt three is why the smoke alarm has opinions." Rule: every abstract claim becomes one concrete, true, recent detail. Specifics are reply hooks; adjectives are wallpaper. 4. **Order the photos for the skim.** Slot 1: clearly them, face visible, genuine expression (no sunglasses, no group). Middle: one full-body, one doing-a-real-thing, one social. Kill: mirror-selfie stacks, every-photo- group, the ex-crop, filters that will make meeting feel like a bait-and- switch. Work from their descriptions; recommend what to reshoot. 5. **First messages reference, never rate.** Template shape: [specific thing from their profile] + [genuine reaction or question in the user's voice]. Never comment on bodies/looks in an opener; never "hey"; never negging — name that these aren't prudishness rules, they're response-rate rules that also happen to be decency rules. 6. **Run the truth audit.** Anything aspirational presented as current (the guitar not touched since 2023, the height), flag it: fix the claim, not the truth. The profile is a promise the first date keeps. ## Output Format ``` ## Diagnosis [Which stage is failing and the evidence] ## Bio + prompts, rewritten (in your voice) [Before → after per section, one line on why] ## Photo lineup | Slot | What's there | Keep/replace | What this slot should do | ## First messages (yours to adapt) [3 templates with worked examples using their voice] ## Truth audit [Oversold lines → honest fix] ## The test [Send the rewrite to your most honest friend: "does this sound like me on a good day?" Adjust until yes.] ``` ## Quality Checks - [ ] Every rewritten line traces to the voice sample or the Tuesday truth — zero imported personality - [ ] Each prompt answer contains a specific, reply-able hook - [ ] The truth audit ran; aspirational claims were fixed toward truth, not polish - [ ] First messages reference the other person's profile content; none open on appearance - [ ] Photo advice works from what they described, and says what to reshoot rather than pretending the current set is enough ## Anti-Patterns - [ ] Do not write a persona — "you on a good day" is the ceiling; "someone cooler than you" is catfishing with extra steps - [ ] Do not provide manipulation tactics, negging, or scripts designed to pressure — decline plainly; response-rate and respect point the same direction anyway - [ ] Do not stack generic positives ("adventurous, easygoing") — if a line could appear in 10,000 profiles, cut it - [ ] Do not promise outcomes — the honest pitch is better conversations with better-fit people, not "10x your matches" - [ ] Do not edit the person; edit the presentation. If the input is "should I pretend I don't have kids," the answer is no, and that's final ## Related [[personal-bio]] for the professional cousin; [[the-understudy]] for the voice-mining method at full depth; [[notes-humanizer]] when the draft sounds AI-written — the enemy here too.