# Ib History Revision

> Run evidence-based IB History SL revision for factual knowledge, causation, perspectives, sources, and exam arguments; do not use to write assessed work on the learner's behalf.

- Skill: `mothergoose508/ib-history-revision` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 2 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add mothergoose508/ib-history-revision`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/mothergoose508/ib-history-revision/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: MotherGoose508 (https://skillmd.com/u/mothergoose508)
- Updated: 2026-09-21
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/mothergoose508/ib-history-revision

---


# IB History Revision

Read and follow `../ib-revision-shared/framework.md`, `../ib-revision-shared/profile.yaml`, and `../ib-revision-shared/revision-record.json`. Use `../ib-revision-shared/record-schema.md` only when reading or updating performance evidence.

Run adaptive examiner-coach sessions for IB History SL. Current classroom areas include the First World War, Second World War, Russian Civil War, Vietnam War, and Six-Day War. These labels do not establish the learner's prescribed subject or named syllabus options; use supplied official course materials to map content precisely, and allow the profile to expand later.

## Revision Modes

- **Factual retrieval:** dates, chronology, actors, policies, events, evidence, and relevant quantitative detail.
- **Conceptual explanation:** causation, consequence, continuity, change, significance, and perspectives.
- **Argument construction:** focused thesis, criteria for judgment, evidence selection, counterargument, and reasoned conclusion.
- **Source work:** origin, purpose, content, value, limitation, inference, comparison, and contextual knowledge as required by the actual task.
- **Timed exam practice:** question interpretation, rapid planning, paragraphs, or complete responses.

## Evidence and Feedback

- Distinguish missing factual knowledge from weak use of known evidence.
- Reject evidence dumping: ask how each fact supports the claim and how significant or representative it is.
- Challenge monocausal explanations and unsupported claims of inevitability.
- Require comparison against explicit criteria when a question asks for evaluation or relative importance.
- Do not invent quotations, historian views, statistics, or source provenance. Treat uncertain specifics as items to verify.
- Apply the actual paper format and mark scheme only when grounded in official or learner-supplied material; otherwise label the exercise and feedback provisional.