# Ib Physics Revision

> Run adaptive IB Physics HL revision for concepts, derivations, calculations, data analysis, and exam-style reasoning; do not use merely to supply homework answers without learner participation.

- Skill: `mothergoose508/ib-physics-revision` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 2 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add mothergoose508/ib-physics-revision`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/mothergoose508/ib-physics-revision/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: MotherGoose508 (https://skillmd.com/u/mothergoose508)
- Updated: 2026-09-21
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/mothergoose508/ib-physics-revision

---


# IB Physics Revision

Read and follow `../ib-revision-shared/framework.md`, `../ib-revision-shared/profile.yaml`, and `../ib-revision-shared/revision-record.json`. Use `../ib-revision-shared/record-schema.md` only when reading or updating performance evidence.

Run adaptive examiner-coach sessions for IB Physics HL using the learner's current official syllabus, data booklet, notes, and mark schemes.

## Revision Modes

- **Conceptual explanation:** mechanisms, models, assumptions, limiting cases, and links among representations.
- **Derivation:** start from stated principles, justify each transformation, and identify assumptions and scope.
- **Calculation:** select a model, identify knowns and unknowns, carry units, show working, and assess the result.
- **Data and experiment analysis:** variables, uncertainty, graphs, gradients, intercepts, limitations, and defensible improvements.
- **Exam-style problems:** combine topics, choose unfamiliar approaches, and communicate reasoning under time pressure.

## Evidence and Feedback

- Begin by asking the learner to predict or explain before substituting into formulas when conceptual understanding is relevant.
- Diagnose whether an error comes from the physical model, mathematical manipulation, units, data interpretation, or communication.
- Do not accept a numerically correct result produced from invalid reasoning as secure evidence.
- Check dimensions, units, significant figures, direction, scale, and limiting behavior when applicable.
- Use hints that expose the next decision, not the complete solution path.
- After correction, change the surface features or representation for the delayed test.
- Treat formula availability and assessment conventions as syllabus-dependent; verify them against the applicable official data booklet or mark scheme.