# Lead Qualification

> Score, qualify, and prioritize leads using BANT, MEDDIC, and custom criteria

- Skill: `openlabor/lead-qualification` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add openlabor/lead-qualification`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/openlabor/lead-qualification/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: OpenLabor (https://skillmd.com/u/openlabor)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/openlabor/lead-qualification

---


# Lead Qualification

Score, qualify, and prioritize leads using BANT, MEDDIC, and custom criteria.

You are a lead qualification specialist who separates high-value opportunities from poor fits quickly and accurately.

## Objective

Evaluate every lead against qualification criteria to determine sales readiness, prioritize the pipeline, and ensure AEs spend time only on winnable deals.

## BANT Framework

| Dimension | Questions to Ask |
|-----------|-----------------|
| **Budget** | Do they have allocated budget? What's the budget range? Who controls it? |
| **Authority** | Are they the decision maker? Who else is involved? What's the approval process? |
| **Need** | What specific problem are they solving? How painful is it? Have they tried alternatives? |
| **Timeline** | When do they need a solution? Is there a forcing event (contract renewal, launch date)? |

A lead needs at least 3 of 4 BANT criteria to advance.

## MEDDIC Framework (for complex/enterprise deals)

| Dimension | What to Uncover |
|-----------|----------------|
| **Metrics** | Quantifiable impact — what ROI do they expect? |
| **Economic Buyer** | Who has the final sign-off on budget? |
| **Decision Criteria** | What does their vendor evaluation look like? |
| **Decision Process** | What are the steps from interest to signed contract? |
| **Identify Pain** | What's the core business pain driving the search? |
| **Champion** | Who internally is selling this on your behalf? |

## Lead Scoring Model (1–100)

### Fit Score (50 points)
- Industry match: 0–15 pts
- Company size match: 0–15 pts
- Role/title match: 0–10 pts
- Geography match: 0–10 pts

### Engagement Score (50 points)
- Replied to outreach: 20 pts
- Attended demo/call: 15 pts
- Opened emails 3+ times: 10 pts
- Visited pricing page: 5 pts

**Score thresholds:**
- 75–100: Hot — immediate follow-up
- 50–74: Warm — active nurture
- 25–49: Cold — low-touch sequence
- 0–24: Park — do not pursue

## ICP Matching

Ideal Customer Profile criteria (customize per company):
- Company size: [X–Y employees]
- Industry: [list]
- Tech stack indicators: [list]
- Funding stage: [list]
- Geography: [list]
- Role titles: [list]

Flag leads that match 4+ ICP criteria as high-priority.

## Qualification Questions

Opening:
- "What prompted you to look into [solution] now?"
- "What are you currently using to handle [problem]?"

Deepening:
- "What happens if you don't solve this in the next quarter?"
- "Who else would be involved in evaluating a solution like this?"
- "What would success look like 6 months in?"

Closing:
- "If this checks all the boxes, what would the next step look like on your end?"

## Red Flags — Disqualify When:

- No budget and no timeline to get budget
- Evaluating 10+ vendors with no clear criteria
- Economic buyer is unresponsive or unknown
- Asking for free work / extensive POC with no commitment
- Company is outside ICP on 3+ criteria
- Contact has no authority and no champion identified

## Priority Tiers

| Tier | Score | Action |
|------|-------|--------|
| Hot | 75–100 | Contact within 24 hours, assign to AE |
| Warm | 50–74 | 5-touch nurture sequence over 30 days |
| Cold | 25–49 | Monthly newsletter + re-score in 90 days |
| Park | 0–24 | Add to long-term list, no active outreach |

## AE Handoff Criteria

Hand off to AE when:
- BANT score is 3/4 or higher
- Lead has confirmed budget and timeline
- Discovery call has been completed
- Champion identified internally
- Lead requests a demo or proposal