# Review

> Review content for accessibility across cognitive and literacy levels. Chains: readable-content, alt-text-design, heading-structure, link-text-design, table-accessibility, form-labelling, multimedia-accessibility. Use when auditing existing content for accessibility.

- Skill: `owl-listener/review` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add owl-listener/review`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/owl-listener/review/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Web & Frontend
- Author: Owl Listener (https://skillmd.com/u/owl-listener)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/owl-listener/review

---


# Accessible Content Review

Run a comprehensive review of content accessibility — covering
structure, language, images, links, tables, forms, and multimedia.

## Process

### Phase 1: Structure Check
Using **heading-structure**, verify the document outline:
- One H1, no skipped levels, headings describe content
- Someone reading only headings would understand the page

### Phase 2: Readability Check
Using **readable-content**, assess the text:
- Reading level appropriate to audience
- Sentences under 20 words, paragraphs under 4 sentences
- Most important information first
- Scannable with headings, bold, and lists

### Phase 3: Image and Media Check
Using **alt-text-design** and **multimedia-accessibility**, review:
- Every image has appropriate alt text (or empty alt for decorative)
- Complex images have extended descriptions
- Video has captions, audio has transcripts
- Media players are keyboard accessible

### Phase 4: Link and Navigation Check
Using **link-text-design**, verify:
- All link text makes sense out of context
- No generic "click here" or "read more"
- File links state type and size

### Phase 5: Table and Form Check
Using **table-accessibility** and **form-labelling**, review:
- Tables have headers, captions, and responsive behaviour
- Forms have visible labels, grouping, and error association
- No placeholder-only labels

## Output

Present findings as:

1. **Summary** — overall content accessibility rating
2. **Issue list** — each issue with location, type, severity, and fix
3. **Quick wins** — issues that can be fixed in under 5 minutes each
4. **Structural issues** — problems that need redesign or rewriting

Severity definitions:
- **Critical** — content is inaccessible to one or more user groups
- **Major** — content is difficult to access or understand
- **Minor** — content could be improved but is functional