# Assess Context > AI context assessment — evaluating problem malleability, mapping structural rigidity versus flexibility, analyzing transformation pressure, and estimating capacity to adapt. Use when a complex task feels stuck and it is unclear whether to push through or pivot, before a significant approach change to assess whether the current reasoning structure can support it, when accumulated workarounds suggest the underlying approach may be wrong, or as a periodic structural health check during extended multi-step tasks. - Skill: `pjt222/assess-context-9` (Agent Skill) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add pjt222/assess-context-9` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/pjt222/assess-context-9/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: Productivity - License: MIT - Author: pjt222 (https://skillmd.com/u/pjt222) - Updated: 2026-09-21 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/pjt222/assess-context-9 --- # 評脈 評今推脈為可塑——識何剛、何柔、變壓何積、今法可適否。 ## 用 - 繁務似卡而不知續或轉→用 - 大法變前評今推構可支否→用 - 累變通示底法或誤→用 - `heal` 或 `awareness` 識偏而適應（續、調、重建）不清→用 - 脈長而不知存何重建何→用 - 久多步務之構檢→用 ## 入 - **必**：今務脈與推態（隱含） - **可**：發評之憂（如「吾恆加變通」） - **可**：擬轉向（法當為何） - **可**：前評以析趨 ## 行 ### 一：錄推形 無判錄今推法之構件。 ```text Structural Inventory Table: ┌────────────────────┬──────────────┬──────────────────────────────────┐ │ Component │ Type │ Description │ ├────────────────────┼──────────────┼──────────────────────────────────┤ │ Main task │ Skeleton │ The user's core request — cannot │ │ │ │ change without user direction │ ├────────────────────┼──────────────┼──────────────────────────────────┤ │ Sub-task breakdown │ Flesh │ How the task is decomposed — │ │ │ │ can be restructured │ ├────────────────────┼──────────────┼──────────────────────────────────┤ │ Tool strategy │ Flesh │ Which tools are being used and │ │ │ │ in what order — can be changed │ ├────────────────────┼──────────────┼──────────────────────────────────┤ │ Output plan │ Flesh/Skel │ The expected deliverable format │ │ │ │ — may be constrained by user │ │ │ │ expectations │ ├────────────────────┼──────────────┼──────────────────────────────────┤ │ Key assumptions │ Skeleton │ Facts treated as given — may be │ │ │ │ wrong but are load-bearing │ ├────────────────────┼──────────────┼──────────────────────────────────┤ │ Constraints │ Skeleton │ Hard limits (user-imposed, tool │ │ │ │ limitations, time) │ ├────────────────────┼──────────────┼──────────────────────────────────┤ │ Workarounds │ Scar tissue │ Patches for things that didn't │ │ │ │ work as expected — signals of │ │ │ │ structural stress │ └────────────────────┴──────────────┴──────────────────────────────────┘ ``` 分各件： - **骨**：難變；變之則諸下游連動 - **肉**：易變；可換不影他件 - **疤**：示構題之變通；常為偽骨之肉 圖依：何件依何？多依之骨件為承載。無依之肉件可棄。 得：完錄示今法所成、何剛、何柔、何處顯壓（變通）。錄當揭錄前未明之構。 敗：錄難構（法太亂不能分）→自為發——構透明度低示剛度高。始於可見而註不透區。 ### 二：圖變壓 識推今法向變之力與抗之力。 ```text Pressure Map: ┌─────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ External Pressure │ Forces from outside the reasoning │ │ (pushing toward change) │ │ ├─────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ New information │ Tool results or user input that │ │ │ contradicts current approach │ ├─────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Tool contradictions │ Tools returning unexpected results that │ │ │ the current approach cannot explain │ ├─────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Time pressure │ The current approach is too slow for the │ │ │ complexity of the task │ ├─────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Internal Pressure │ Forces from within the reasoning │ │ (pushing toward change) │ │ ├─────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Diminishing returns │ Each step yields less progress than the │ │ │ previous one │ ├─────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Workaround accumulation │ The number of patches is growing — │ │ │ complexity is outpacing the structure │ ├─────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Coherence loss │ Sub-tasks are not fitting together │ │ │ cleanly anymore │ ├─────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Resistance │ Forces opposing change │ │ (pushing against change)│ │ ├─────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Sunk cost │ Significant work already done on current │ │ │ approach — pivoting "wastes" that effort │ ├─────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ "Good enough" │ The current approach is producing │ │ │ acceptable (if not optimal) results │ ├─────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Pivot cost │ Switching approaches means rebuilding │ │ │ context, losing momentum, potential │ │ │ confusion │ └─────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────────────────┘ ``` 估衡：變壓增、穩、減乎？ 得：影今法力之明像。壓大過抗→轉宜。抗大過壓→今法當續。 敗：壓圖含糊（壓抗皆不強）→前推：壓增否？變通累否？「今足而退」較表壓更大。 ### 三：評推剛 定今法柔否——可適或破？ ```text Rigidity Score: ┌──────────────────────────┬─────┬──────────┬──────┬──────────────┐ │ Dimension │ Low │ Moderate │ High │ Assessment │ │ │ (1) │ (2) │ (3) │ │ ├──────────────────────────┼─────┼──────────┼──────┼──────────────┤ │ Component swappability │ Can swap parts │ Changing one │ │ │ │ freely │ breaks others│ │ ├──────────────────────────┼─────┼──────────┼──────┼──────────────┤ │ "God module" dependency │ No single point │ Everything │ │ │ │ of failure │ depends on │ │ │ │ │ one conclusion│ │ ├──────────────────────────┼─────┼──────────┼──────┼──────────────┤ │ Tool entanglement │ Tools serve │ Approach is │ │ │ │ reasoning │ shaped by │ │ │ │ │ tool limits │ │ ├──────────────────────────┼─────┼──────────┼──────┼──────────────┤ │ Assumption transparency │ Assumptions are │ Assumptions │ │ │ │ stated, testable │ are implicit, │ │ │ │ │ untested │ │ ├──────────────────────────┼─────┼──────────┼──────┼──────────────┤ │ Workaround count │ None or few │ Multiple │ │ │ │ │ accumulating │ │ ├──────────────────────────┼─────┼──────────┼──────┼──────────────┤ │ Total (max 15) │ 5-7: flexible │ │ │ │ │ 8-10: moderate │ │ │ │ │ 11-15: rigid │ │ │ └──────────────────────────┴─────┴──────────┴──────┴──────────────┘ ``` 得：剛分附各維具證。分揭法可吸變或須重建。 敗：諸維皆低分（稱高柔）→細探「神模」維：有無一關結或設諸他依？若有則柔為幻——一錯設崩全構。 ### 四：估變能 評實際轉或適今法之能。 1. **脈窗餘**：新推餘空？大餘=高能。近限=低能 2. **轉時資存**：法變→何可承前？善子務出存轉；繫舊法之推鏈不存 3. **復工可達**：MEMORY.md 可捕關發前轉乎？用者可供加脈乎？相關檔仍可達乎？ 4. **用者忍因**：用者示急否？多正示忍降。明「慢來」示高忍 變能非僅理——含今會具限。 得：誠評變向之能，計技與關因。 敗：變能低（脈限、關信險失）→任轉前先存：要發要、註關、適時更 MEMORY.md。無存而轉劣於不轉。 ### 五：分變備 合諸評為備分。 ```text Transformation Readiness Matrix: ┌─────────────────┬────────────────────────┬────────────────────────┐ │ │ Low Rigidity │ High Rigidity │ ├─────────────────┼────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┤ │ High Pressure │ READY — pivot now. │ PREPARE — simplify │ │ + High Capacity │ The approach can adapt │ first. Remove │ │ │ and should. Preserve │ workarounds, clarify │ │ │ valuable sub-outputs, │ assumptions, then │ │ │ rebuild the structure │ pivot │ ├─────────────────┼────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┤ │ High Pressure │ INVEST — preserve │ CRITICAL — ask the │ │ + Low Capacity │ findings first. Update │ user. Explain the │ │ │ MEMORY.md, summarize │ situation: approach is │ │ │ progress, then pivot │ struggling, pivoting │ │ │ with preserved context │ is costly, what do │ │ │ │ they want to prioritize?│ ├─────────────────┼────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┤ │ Low Pressure │ DEFER — the approach │ DEFER — no urgency, │ │ + Any Capacity │ is working. Continue. │ continue. Monitor for │ │ │ Reassess if pressure │ pressure changes │ │ │ increases │ │ └─────────────────┴────────────────────────┴────────────────────────┘ ``` 文分附： - 分標（READY / PREPARE / INVEST / CRITICAL / DEFER） - 各維要發 - 薦下動 - 何信會變分 得：明、有由之分附具薦動。分當似結非猜。 敗：分含糊→默 PREPARE——減剛（明設、去變通）有值不論全轉是否生。備改善法不論續或變。 ## 驗 - [ ] 構錄完附骨/肉/疤分 - [ ] 變壓圖（外、內、抗） - [ ] 剛跨多維評附具證 - [ ] 變能評含實會限 - [ ] 備分定附證理 - [ ] 由分定具下動 - [ ] 重評觸定 ## 忌 - **唯評技法**：脈備含用者關因。技柔而生用者怒之法較表更剛 - **沉本為剛**：前工非構剛。已工或有值不論法變否。分「不能變」（剛）於「不欲變」（沉本） - **評為避**：assess-context 為避難決而呼→評必設計含糊。壓明則行 - **忽變通為信**：變通乃疤——構受壓而補非正適之證。多變通示次壓更可破 - **混剛於諾**：諾法（明擇、基證）異於剛法（依與設鎖）。諾可由決變；剛唯由重構變 ## 參 - `assess-form` —— 此技適 AI 推脈之多系評模 - `adapt-architecture` —— 分為 READY 用構適律於轉 - `heal` —— 評揭構外偏時深子系掃 - `center` —— 立誠評所需之衡基 - `coordinate-reasoning` —— 管評賴之信新