# Point Partner Creative Review > Review partner-, affiliate-, broker-, or publisher-submitted creative featuring Point for obvious first-pass brand, copy, product, disclosure, production, and customer-journey issues before human Brand, Content, or Compliance review. Use for ads, tiles, scripts, emails, landing pages, documents, or creative batches; not for final compliance approval or net-new campaign ideation. - Skill: `pointdotcom-marketing/point-partner-creative-review` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 2 files) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add pointdotcom-marketing/point-partner-creative-review` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/pointdotcom-marketing/point-partner-creative-review/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: Marketing & Growth - Author: pointdotcom-marketing (https://skillmd.com/u/pointdotcom-marketing) - Updated: 2026-09-17 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/pointdotcom-marketing/point-partner-creative-review --- # Point Partner Creative Review Review submitted creative for observable defects and material evidence gaps before human Brand, Content, or Compliance review. This first pass supports review; it does not approve publication. ## Sources and scope Read [review-rubric.md](references/review-rubric.md) for every review. Use `point-brand-guidelines` for visual submissions and `point-brand-voice` for copy or product messaging. Use `point-social-ad-ideation` only when concept development is requested. Current approved product, Legal, and Compliance sources take precedence over historical creative and previous reviews. Partner styling is intentional unless it misuses Point identity, conflicts with the stated brand relationship, or creates a material credibility or legibility defect. Inspect every in-scope page, slide, or frame visually. Extracted text supports copy review but does not replace image inspection. Open embedded creative at sufficient resolution to judge it. Anchor findings to the artifact's filename, slide, frame, timestamp, or region. Report inaccessible material when it prevents judgment on a likely material risk. ## Priorities - **P0 — Blocker:** a materially misleading product claim, fabricated Point identity, unauthorized or misleading destination, or another severe defect that makes the creative unsuitable to advance. - **P1 — Required fix:** a clear brand, copy, disclosure, journey, or production defect that must be corrected before approval. - **P2 — Verify or route:** a material uncertainty requiring a current source or an owner, such as claim support, disclosure applicability, or destination behavior. Assign severity by the actual implication and evidence. For example, framing an HEI offer as a conventional loan can be P0 when it materially misleads; a terminology inconsistency without that implication can be P1. An external domain alone is not a defect in a legitimate partner journey. ## Output Default to a short, copy-pasteable list. Start with status, scope, and the top priority, then group findings under `### P0 — Blockers`, `### P1 — Required fixes`, and `### P2 — Verify or route`, omitting empty groups. Use this shape: Obvious issues found. Scope: Slides 8–10 of the placements deck. Top priority: Slide 10 uses a fabricated Point logo. ### P0 — Blockers - Slide 10, logo — Uses a fabricated Point mark. Replace it with an approved asset. ### P2 — Verify or route - Slide 9, footer — No licensing identifier is visible. Compliance should confirm the requirement for this placement and market. Keep bullets concise: `Location — issue. Action.` Combine findings that share a correction; include an owner only when needed to resolve the issue. Report all material decisions without a fixed bullet quota. Exclude optional polish, duplicate observations, and routine downstream QA that does not affect this first pass. End after the findings. If no obvious issues are found, use one paragraph stating that result, the reviewed scope, and that this is a first pass rather than approval. Add a brief scope limitation only when material content could not be assessed. Follow an explicitly requested alternative output format. Complete the analysis only. Editing files, contacting partners, submitting for approval, or approving work requires a user request.