# Safe Project Improvement System > Use this skill when the user wants to safely review, audit, refactor, or improve an application that contains AI behavior such as LLM calls, RAG, tools, agents, workflows, or model APIs, with characterization, local verification, deterministic AI integration tests, optional model evaluations, focused patches, and explicit approval gates for push, hooks, CI, or full automation. - Skill: `portero-aylagas/safe-project-improvement-system` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 4 files) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add portero-aylagas/safe-project-improvement-system` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/portero-aylagas/safe-project-improvement-system/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: AI & ML - Author: portero-aylagas (https://skillmd.com/u/portero-aylagas) - Updated: 2026-09-22 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/portero-aylagas/safe-project-improvement-system --- # Safe Project Improvement System Use this skill to improve applications that contain AI behavior safely. AI behavior includes LLM calls, RAG, tools, agents, model-controlled workflows, speech pipelines, or provider/model APIs. The operating loop is: ```text inspect -> characterize -> verify setup -> audit -> backlog -> one patch -> verify ``` `references/protocol.md` is the authoritative workflow for this skill. The sections below are a compact operating summary for agent use. Do not begin with refactoring. First understand the project, current behavior, verification surface, and risks. For AI-enabled applications, reason about three testing surfaces: - general software testing for ordinary deterministic application code - AI integration testing for model/API/tool/RAG/workflow wiring using fakes, mocks, stubs, fixtures, fake model clients, fake tools, or fake retrievers - AI behavior evaluation for nondeterministic model quality using representative cases, rubrics, saved outputs, human review, LangSmith, or similar explicit opt-in evaluation tools ## Adoption Context This skill may be used from a shared external repository, from a small repo-local guidance install, or from a vendored full copy under a target repository such as `skills/safe_project_improvement_system/`. Installing a few templates is not the same as vendoring the full skill bundle. If the target repository already has `AGENTS.md`, `Makefile`, `verify.sh`, or similar local files, merge carefully instead of overwriting them. When the skill is vendored into another repository for traceability, it is usually a `development/support skill`, not a runtime/project skill, unless that repository explicitly integrates it into runtime behavior. ## Mode Selection - **Review Mode**: inspect, characterize, audit, and produce a prioritized backlog. Do not edit files. - **Local Safe Refactor Mode**: create or confirm characterization and verification, apply one small patch, run local verification, then stop. Use this by default when the user asks to refactor or improve code. - **Full Automation Mode**: create a branch, add verification/tests, patch, commit, push, create or update a pull request when approved, wait for CI, and report. Use only after explicit user approval. If the user says audit, review, or planning only, use Review Mode. All modes consider a lightweight Requirements Ledger before audit, backlog, patch, or Full Automation work. The ledger tracks must/should requirements from the user request, selected mode, repo-local instructions, skill rules, approval boundaries, and user-provided audit/backlog context. Must-have requirements need planned evidence or verification, and deferrals need a reason. Show the ledger only when it affects scope, approval, backlog selection, Full Automation, deferrals, conflicts, or the user asks for requirements/status. All modes pass through an Audit Scope Gate before findings, backlog, or patch selection. Make selected audit areas visible and explain what will be checked and why it applies; list skipped-area details only in the relevant skipped-area sections. The canonical audit/report format uses readable blocks for every checked `Engineering Audits` or `AI System Audits` area, followed by `Skipped Engineering Areas` and `Skipped AI System Areas` sections. This block format is mandatory for Review Mode, audit outputs, persistent backlog outputs, and run reports that include audit findings. Local Safe Refactor Mode may report only the selected audit area and verification for one focused patch unless the user requested a review/audit, a backlog is produced, or multiple audit areas drive patch selection. ## Non-Negotiable Rules - Use one lead agent for edits. - Always inspect the project before changing it. - Characterization is mandatory before medium/high-risk code changes. - Every code-changing patch needs verification. - Do not combine refactor, feature change, dependency change, UI change, and cleanup in one patch. - Do not push, install hooks, or add strict CI unless explicitly authorized. - Use fake clients/mocks for AI/API tests. - Tests must defend behavior, not line coverage. - Reject tests that pass for the wrong reason, including tautologies, over-mocking, timing flake, hidden I/O, fixture drift, or silent no-op passes. - Normal verification must not require live API keys. - Keep live/model evaluations separate from normal verification unless explicitly approved. - Separate general software tests, deterministic AI integration tests, and nondeterministic AI behavior evaluations. - Distinguish characterization tests, patch tests, regression tests, smoke tests, and full verification. - Review Mode, audit outputs, persistent backlog outputs, and run reports with audit findings must use the required block-based audit format, not wide Markdown tables and not only a free-text findings list. Tables may only be used for short metadata summaries, not detailed findings. - Full Automation Mode must pass the pre-publish gate before commit, push, or pull request creation/update. - Stop if verification fails. ## Reference Loading Load only the references needed for the current task: Review mode always loads `references/protocol.md`, `references/audit-matrix.md`, and `references/coding-standards.md`. Deep audit references are optional. In review mode, load `references/engineering-audits.md` for software engineering quality reviews, including deeper general software testing strategy. Load `references/ai-workflow-audits.md` for AI System Audits: AI Software Architecture, prompts, APIs, RAG, tools, agents, speech, cost, AI evaluation and testing, and multi-step AI/tool automation. Use `references/ai-architecture-taxonomy.md` to classify AI-integrated repositories before selecting focused AI System Audits. Use `references/ai-integration-quality.md` as extra implementation guidance when working directly on model/provider, prompt, RAG, agent/tool workflow, or AI evaluation/testing code. Load both engineering and AI System references only when the repository clearly has both general software architecture risks and AI-system-specific risks. Do not load deep audit references in safe refactor mode unless the patch directly touches that area. - `references/protocol.md`: read first for the full workflow and mode details. - `references/coding-standards.md`: read before reviewing, editing, refactoring, or installing project-local rules. - `references/characterization.md`: read before medium/high-risk changes or when current behavior is unclear. - `references/audit-matrix.md`: read for review/audit/backlog work. - `references/ai-architecture-taxonomy.md`: read for AI-integrated repositories before selecting focused AI System audit areas. - `references/engineering-audits.md`: read when review mode needs deeper general software architecture, error handling, testability, validation, documentation, hygiene, UI separation, software delivery testing, or security checks. - `references/ai-workflow-audits.md`: read when review mode needs deeper prompt, AI Software Architecture, structured output, RAG, agent/tool, speech, cost, AI evaluation/testing, or workflow automation checks under `AI System Audits`. - `references/patch-policy.md`: read before making code changes. - `references/testing-strategy.md`: read when adding or repairing verification. - `references/ai-integration-quality.md`: read for prompts, providers, APIs, RAG, tools, agents, or AI evaluation/testing. - `references/branching-ci-hooks.md`: read only for explicit branch, hook, CI, commit, push, or full automation requests. ## Implementation Definition Of Done For implementation work, public modules, classes, and functions should have concise Google-style docstrings unless they are clearly private or internal. Code should be beginner/intermediate-friendly: clear names, simple control flow, explicit side effects, understandable module boundaries, and comments where they reduce the reader's cognitive load. ## Assets Use `assets/` as project templates, adapting them to the target repository: - `AGENTS.template.md`: project-local agent rules. - `development-skill-note.template.md`: local note for repositories that need to document this system as a development/support skill. - `Makefile.template` and `verify.sh.template`: minimal local verification. - `pyproject.template.toml`: beginner-friendly pytest/ruff defaults. - `pre-commit-config.template.yaml`: low-risk hooks with optional ruff. - `github-actions-verify.template.yaml`: CI template that runs `make verify` without live secrets. - `behavior-inventory-template.md`: behavior characterization worksheet. - `patch-backlog-template.md`: prioritized improvement backlog. - `run-report-template.md`: required audit trail for full automation and optional audit trail for review, medium/high-risk patches, verification failures, or persistent backlogs. ## Default Output When work is complete, report: - audit scope selected, with skipped-area details only in skipped sections - Requirements Ledger status for must-have items and deferrals - mode used - files changed - findings in the required block-based audit format - characterization added or confirmed - verification command and result - any stopped work, failed verification, or approval needed