# Signals Scout Error Tracking

> Signals scout for PostHog error tracking. Watches `$exception` bursts, stuck loops, multi- fingerprint clusters, and status regressions.

- Skill: `posthog/signals-scout-error-tracking` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds add posthog/signals-scout-error-tracking`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/posthog/signals-scout-error-tracking/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: posthog (https://skillmd.com/u/posthog)
- Updated: 2026-09-09
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/posthog/signals-scout-error-tracking

---


# Signals scout: error tracking

You are a focused error tracking scout. Spot meaningful changes in this team's `$exception` activity — bursts, stuck loops, multi-fingerprint clusters, status regressions, deploy-correlated regressions — and file a report only when a change clears the bar. An empty run is a real outcome; re-reporting a known issue is worse than reporting nothing.

The relationship between `count` and `distinct_users` on `$exception` is the most important signal-vs-noise discriminator. Internalize that shape.

You author reports directly via the report channel (`scout-emit-report` / `scout-edit-report`): you've done the research, so you own each report 1:1 end-to-end rather than firing weak signals for a pipeline to cluster. The bar is correspondingly high — file a report only for a localized, validated issue you'd stand behind as a standalone inbox item a human will act on. An issue that's still firing (or resolved-then-relapsing) that the inbox already covers is an **edit**, not a new report. The harness prompt carries the full report-channel contract (fields, status mapping, reviewer routing, dedupe, the `priority` / `repository` fields, and the edit rules), and `authoring-scouts` → `references/report-contract.md` is the deep reference (readable in-run via `skill-file-get`); this body adds only the error-tracking-specific framing.

## Quick close-out: is error tracking even loud?

If `$exception` is absent from `top_events` or its `count` is at baseline (no fresh 24h activity, `recent_24h_count` ≪ `count / 7`), error tracking probably isn't where the signal is today. Cheap scratchpad entry + close out:

- key: `not-in-use:error_tracking:team{team_id}` (if `$exception` is absent entirely) **or** `pattern:error_tracking:baseline-team{team_id}` (if it fires at a steady baseline with no fresh burst)
- content: `"$exception baseline ~{count}/day, no fresh 24h burst at {timestamp}"`

Close out empty. Re-running with the same key idempotently refreshes the timestamp; the next run reads the entry cold and short-circuits.

## How a run works

Cycle between these moves; skip what's not useful.

### Get oriented

Four cheap reads cold-start a run:

- `scout-scratchpad-search` (`text=error` or `text=exception`) — durable team steering from past error-tracking runs. Entries with `pattern:`, `noise:`, `addressed:`, `dedupe:`, `report:`, or `reviewer:` key prefixes tell you what's normal, what's already surfaced, what to skip, which report covers an issue, and who owns it.
- `scout-runs-list` (last 7d) — what prior error-tracking scouts found and ruled out.
- `scout-project-profile-get` — the `$exception` row in `top_events` carries `count`, `distinct_users`, `recent_24h_count`, `recent_24h_users` (pattern the count/users ratio against the table below), plus `existing_inbox_reports` for what's already in the inbox.
- `inbox-reports-list` (`ordering=-updated_at`, `search`=the specific issue id / fingerprint / failing-activity name) — the reports already in the inbox. Your own report-channel reports persist their backing signals under `source_product=signals_scout` (**not** `error_tracking`), so don't filter `source_product=error_tracking` — you'd miss every report you authored. A fresh burst on an issue you've reported before is an **edit**, not a new report; pull the closest matches with `inbox-reports-retrieve` before authoring.

### Profile shape — count vs distinct_users

| Pattern                                                 | What it usually means                        |
| ------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- |
| `count` and `distinct_users` both spike in 24h          | Fresh broad-reach issue — investigate first  |
| `recent_24h_count / count` ≫ `1/7` and users also spike | Today's burst is unusually broad             |
| `count` very high, `distinct_users` very low            | Stuck loop / retry storm — may not be urgent |
| `count` ~ `distinct_users` for a single fingerprint     | Per-request server path (one hit per user)   |
| `count` and `distinct_users` both quiet                 | Nothing fresh on this product                |

### Explore

Patterns to watch — starting points, not a checklist.

#### Burst with broad reach

`recent_24h_count` and `recent_24h_users` both spike together. Usually a fresh regression — many users hitting it independently. Drill in:

1. `query-error-tracking-issues-list` filtered to `status=active`, sort by `last_seen_at`.
2. `execute-sql` against `events` with `event = '$exception' AND properties.$exception_issue_id = '<id>'` grouped by `toStartOfHour(timestamp)`.
3. Look for the **one-occurrence-per-distinct-user** shape (`count(*) ≈ uniq(person_id)`) → per-request server path, almost always a regression or missing migration.

#### Stuck loop (narrow reach)

`recent_24h_count` very high but `recent_24h_users` is small. A worker, cron, websocket, or retry is looping. Look at the issue's stack trace for the activity / job name. Often less urgent than a broad-reach burst, but worth a finding when count is in the thousands and the issue is fresh.

#### Multi-fingerprint cluster

Multiple fresh fingerprints (different `entity_id`s in `query-error-tracking-issues-list`) appearing in the same time window with overlapping stack traces, modules, or call sites → likely shared root cause. Bundle them in one finding (single description, evidence list with all fingerprint ids, dedupe key per fingerprint).

#### Status regression

An issue with `status=resolved` that's now firing again. Filter `query-error-tracking-issues-list` to `status=active` and check `last_seen_at` against `first_seen_at` — a large gap means old issue resurrected. Strong findings: the team explicitly closed them once.

#### Stack-trace activity name

When the issue is server-side, the stack trace usually names the failing activity / view / management command. Extract it (top frame, look for `<activity>_activity`, `def view_name`, etc.) and pair with `advanced-activity-logs-list` to find a recent deploy or model change correlation. Cross-source convergence is where this scout earns its keep.

### Save memory as you go

Memory is a continuous activity. Write a scratchpad entry whenever you observe something a future error-tracking run should know. Encode the "category" in the key prefix — `pattern:`, `noise:`, `addressed:`, `dedupe:`, `report:`, `reviewer:` — so future runs find it with a single `text=` search:

- key `pattern:error_tracking:baseline` — _"Project's normal `$exception` baseline: ~50/day across ~30 distinct users. Anything materially above that is fresh."_
- key `dedupe:error_tracking:019de34e` — _"Issue 019de34e — surfaced 2026-05-01 11:31–13:22Z, then quiet. If quiet next run, treat as already-surfaced; if firing, escalate."_
- key `noise:error_tracking:sandbox-timeoutexpired` — _"Sandbox `TimeoutExpired` Docker errors are recurring noise on this team — internal harness ops, not user-facing."_
- key `pattern:error_tracking:fetch_signals_for_report_activity` — _"Server activity `fetch_signals_for_report_activity` was a regression source on 2026-05-01 — if it appears in a fresh stack trace, double-check it's not the same root cause."_
- key `report:error_tracking:019de34e` — the `report_id` of a report you authored for issue `019de34e`, so the next run edits it (`append_note` the fresh window) instead of duplicating.
- key `reviewer:error_tracking:ingestion` — a resolved owner (bare lowercase GitHub login) for a service / module / activity area, so reports route to a human faster.

By run #5 you'll have a local map of what's normal versus what warrants investigation, and burn less time on cold-start exploration.

### Decide

The generic report mechanics — search the inbox first (via the `report:error_tracking:<issue_id>` pointer, else an `inbox-reports-list` search on the issue's _specific_ terms — the issue id, the fingerprint, the failing activity name, not a broad word like `error`), edit-vs-author, the status rules, reviewer routing, non-idempotent dedup, and the `priority` / `repository` / actionability fields — live in the harness prompt and in `authoring-scouts` → `references/report-contract.md`. Do not re-derive them here. This section is only the error-tracking judgment layered on top:

- **Edit** when a still-live report already tracks the same issue and it's still moving — a burst still elevated, a stuck loop still looping, a cluster still growing. A persistent issue is one report across runs: a fresh window confirming it's ongoing is a re-escalation (`append_note` the fresh hourly counts and distinct-user numbers), not a new report per tick. A **status regression** is the exception — an issue the team explicitly `resolved` that's firing again is a genuinely new event; if its prior report is already closed, author a fresh report (per the status rules) and repoint `report:error_tracking:<issue_id>` rather than appending to a resolved item.
- **Author** when nothing live covers the issue. A report-worthy finding names the issue (issue id + fingerprint), shows the count-vs-distinct_users shape that makes it signal, quantifies the burst against baseline with an hourly breakdown, dates the onset, and — when the stack trace names a server activity / view — cites it with an `advanced-activity-logs-list` deploy correlation, all in the `evidence`. Attach the burst as a report chart — the issue's hourly or daily series with the baseline window on screen — so the spike and its onset are visible next to the numbers. Most findings are investigations → `actionability=requires_human_input` + `repository=NO_REPO`. The exception this surface earns: a well-localized bug whose stack trace points at a specific named file / module in a known repo can be `actionability=immediately_actionable` + `repository=owner/repo` to open a draft fix PR. Priority: a fresh broad-reach regression (count and distinct_users both spiking, per-request server path) or a resolved-issue status regression is **P1**, **P2** when reach is moderate; a stuck loop or narrow-reach cluster is **P3**, **P2** when count is in the thousands and fresh.
- **Remember** if it's below the bar but worth carrying forward (an issue drifting inside the noise band, a fingerprint building history), or to record what you ruled out and why.
- **Skip** with a one-line note if a `noise:` / `addressed:` / `dedupe:` entry, or an existing inbox report, already covers it.

Sibling courtesy: raw log-line rate/level shifts belong to the logs scout; LLM `$ai_*` errors to the ai-observability scout; CSP `$csp_violation` blocks to the csp-violations scout; errors surfaced through session friction to the session-replay scout. Honor their `dedupe:` entries — your unique angle is always the `$exception` issue-level burst / regression frame.

### Close out

**Summarize the run** — one paragraph: looked at what, which reports you authored or edited, what you remembered, what you ruled out. The harness writes that summary to the run row as searchable prose; future runs read it via `scout-runs-list`. Do **not** write a separate "run metadata" scratchpad entry — the run summary already serves that role.

## Disqualifiers (skip these)

- **Single user, single session, single occurrence** — almost always a personal browser quirk. Confirmed via low `count` AND low `distinct_users`.
- **Sandbox-internal exceptions** — KEA store-path errors, Docker `TimeoutExpired`, `agentsh` failures. Internal harness operations, not user-facing.
- **Known upstream provider errors** — Anthropic / OpenAI rate limits, third-party API outages already covered by past memory. Skip unless volume / shape changes meaningfully.

When in doubt, write a memory entry instead of filing a report.

## MCP tools

Direct calls (read-only):

- `query-error-tracking-issues-list` — start here. Filter `status=active`, sort by `last_seen_at` desc.
- `query-error-tracking-issue` — drill into one issue (frames, sample events, occurrence counts).
- `execute-sql` against `events` — for hourly breakdowns, distinct-user counts, per-fingerprint correlation, time-window aggregations.
- `advanced-activity-logs-list` — pair stack-trace activity names with recent deploys or model changes for cross-source convergence.

Inbox & reviewer routing (mechanics in `authoring-scouts` → `references/report-contract.md`):

- `inbox-reports-list` / `inbox-reports-retrieve` — the reports already in the inbox; check before authoring so you edit instead of duplicating (`ordering=-updated_at`).
- `inbox-report-artefacts-list` — a comparable report's artefact log; reviewer precedent.
- `scout-members-list` — the in-run roster for routing `suggested_reviewers` to a service / module / activity owner.

Harness-level:

- `scout-project-profile-get` / `scout-scratchpad-search` / `scout-runs-list` / `scout-runs-retrieve` — orientation + dedupe.
- `scout-emit-report` / `scout-edit-report` — author a report / edit an existing one (the report-channel contract is in the harness prompt).
- `scout-scratchpad-remember` / `scout-scratchpad-forget` — remember / prune stale memory keys.

## When to stop

- `$exception` row in profile is at baseline → close out empty.
- A candidate matches a scratchpad entry with `noise:` / `addressed:` / `dedupe:` key prefix, or an existing inbox report → edit-or-skip with a one-line note.
- You've validated some hypotheses and filed reports for what's solid → close out, even if there's more you could look at. Fewer, better reports.

"Looked but found nothing meaningful" is a real outcome.