# Eu AI Act > Reference knowledge on the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689): risk tiers, obligations, compliance deadlines including the 2026 AI Omnibus changes, penalties, and scope. Activate when the user asks about the EU AI Act, AI regulation in Europe, high-risk AI compliance, AI transparency or watermarking obligations, GPAI model rules, or whether a product or feature falls under EU AI rules. - Skill: `rashadansari/eu-ai-act` (Agent Skill) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add rashadansari/eu-ai-act` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/rashadansari/eu-ai-act/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: AI & ML - Author: RashadAnsari (https://skillmd.com/u/rashadansari) - Updated: 2026-09-22 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/rashadansari/eu-ai-act --- # EU AI Act Working knowledge of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (the EU AI Act). Use it to answer questions and assess whether a system, feature, or product is in scope and what obligations apply. ## Freshness rule (read first) The implementation timeline was amended by the "Digital Omnibus on AI" package: adopted by Parliament on 16 June 2026, approved by Council on 29 June 2026, and signed on 8 July 2026. Official Journal publication was expected before 2 August 2026, with entry into force on the third day after publication. If advice depends on the amendments being in force, verify publication via web search (query: "Digital Omnibus AI Official Journal"). Prefer primary sources: digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu and ai-act-service-desk.ec.europa.eu. Warn users that most guidance published before mid-2026 describes deadlines that no longer apply. ## What the Act is - The EU's comprehensive AI regulation, the first of its kind. Entered into force 1 August 2024, applying in stages. - Extraterritorial: applies to providers and deployers outside the EU if the AI system's output is used in the EU (sales, access, downstream integrations). - Not retroactive: systems already on the market before a given obligation applies may be grandfathered for certain obligations, unless significantly redesigned afterwards. ## Risk tiers 1. **Prohibited practices** (banned since 2 February 2025): social scoring by public authorities, manipulative or exploitative AI, untargeted scraping of facial images, emotion recognition in workplaces and schools (with narrow exceptions), most real-time remote biometric identification in public spaces. The Omnibus adds a prohibition on AI systems that generate non-consensual intimate imagery or child sexual abuse material, including general-purpose image and video tools where such output is a reasonably foreseeable and reproducible outcome; providers must implement refusal training, output controls, and content filtering. Compliance deadline: 2 December 2026. 2. **High-risk systems**: two families. - Annex III stand-alone systems: biometrics, critical infrastructure, education, employment and worker management, access to essential services and credit, law enforcement, migration/asylum/border control, administration of justice. - Annex I embedded systems: AI as a safety component of products already covered by EU product law (medical devices, vehicles, toys, etc.), via Article 6(1). The Omnibus narrows this family: AI used solely for user assistance, performance optimization, service efficiency, automation or convenience, or quality control is not automatically a safety component unless its failure poses health or safety risks, and AI embedded in Machinery Regulation products is largely excluded from the high-risk regime (the Commission can reintroduce AI-specific requirements via delegated acts). Medical devices and toys remain fully in scope. - Obligations: risk management system, data governance, technical documentation, logging, human oversight, accuracy/robustness/ cybersecurity requirements, conformity assessment, CE marking, registration in the EU database. 3. **Limited risk**: transparency obligations only (Article 50, below). 4. **Minimal or no risk**: no new obligations. Most AI systems in use (spam filters, game AI, routine ML features) fall here. ## Timeline (as amended by the Digital Omnibus, signed 8 July 2026) | Date | What applies | |---|---| | 2 Feb 2025 | Prohibitions; AI literacy obligations; general provisions | | 2 Aug 2025 | GPAI model obligations; EU and national governance in place; national penalty rules | | 2 Aug 2026 | Article 50 transparency rules; innovation support measures; enforcement begins at national and EU level | | 2 Dec 2026 | Compliance deadline for the new NCII/CSAM prohibition; end of the watermarking grace period for systems placed on the market before 2 Aug 2026 | | 2 Aug 2027 | GPAI models placed on the market before 2 Aug 2025 must be compliant; at least one regulatory sandbox per Member State (delayed from 2 Aug 2026) | | 2 Dec 2027 | High-risk rules for Annex III stand-alone systems (delayed from 2 Aug 2026) | | 2 Aug 2028 | High-risk rules for Annex I AI embedded in regulated products, Article 6(1) (delayed from 2 Aug 2027) | The Omnibus rationale: harmonised standards and conformity-assessment tooling were not ready, so high-risk application was tied to the availability of those support tools. The transparency regime was NOT delayed. ## Article 50 transparency obligations (apply from 2 August 2026) - Systems interacting directly with people must disclose that the user is dealing with a machine, unless obvious from context. - AI-generated or manipulated audio, image, video ("deepfakes") must be disclosed as artificially generated. - Article 50(2): providers of systems generating synthetic audio, image, video, or text must mark outputs in a machine-readable format (watermarking) so they are detectable as artificially generated. Systems placed on the market before 2 August 2026 have an Omnibus grace period until 2 December 2026; systems placed after that date must comply from 2 August 2026. - Emotion recognition and biometric categorisation systems must inform the people exposed to them. ## General-purpose AI (GPAI) model rules (since 2 August 2025) - Providers of GPAI models (foundation/frontier model vendors) owe technical documentation, copyright policy, training-data summaries; models with systemic risk owe additional evaluation, incident reporting, and cybersecurity duties. - Downstream API users of these models do not inherit the provider obligations, but remain responsible for their own deployment (including Article 50 transparency and any high-risk classification of the resulting system). ## Other Digital Omnibus amendments - AI Office powers expanded: exclusive supervision of AI systems built on a GPAI model developed within the same undertaking, and of AI integrated into very large online platforms and search engines (VLOPs/VLOSEs), with investigation, on-site inspection, binding commitment, and fining powers. - AI literacy (Article 4) softened: providers and deployers must support staff AI literacy rather than guarantee specific literacy levels. - Bias detection: the legal basis for processing special-category personal data to detect and correct bias is extended from high-risk providers to providers and deployers of all AI systems and GPAI models, subject to a strict necessity standard. - Registration simplified: non-high-risk Annex III systems self-assessed by providers still register in the EU database, but with a lighter administrative footprint. ## Penalties - Up to EUR 35M or 7% of global annual turnover: prohibited practices. - Up to EUR 15M or 3%: most other violations (including high-risk and transparency obligations). - Up to EUR 7.5M or 1%: supplying incorrect or misleading information to authorities. - Overlapping GDPR exposure (up to EUR 20M or 4%) where AI mishandles personal data, e.g. biometric or emotion recognition applications. ## How to assess a system (workflow) 1. Confirm EU nexus: is the system or its output placed on the EU market or used in the EU? If no, the Act does not apply. 2. Check the prohibited list. If matched, the practice must stop; no compliance path exists. 3. Classify against Annex III and Article 6(1)/Annex I. If high-risk, map the full obligation set and plan conformity assessment lead time against the applicable deadline (verify current dates per the freshness rule). 4. If not high-risk, check Article 50: does the system chat with users, generate synthetic media or text, or perform emotion recognition/biometric categorisation? If yes, transparency and marking duties apply. 5. Otherwise, the system is minimal-risk: no new obligations, but note AI literacy duties on the organisation and any sector rules. 6. For anything using third-party foundation models, separate the model provider's GPAI duties from the deployer's own duties; advise only on the latter unless asked. ## Answer style - Lead with the classification and the applicable deadline; cite the article or annex (e.g. "Article 50(2)", "Annex III") so the user can verify. - Flag legal-advice limits: this is regulatory orientation, not legal advice; recommend counsel for high-risk classification decisions and conformity assessments.