# Caveman Review

> Ultra-compressed code review comments. Cuts noise from PR feedback while preserving the actionable signal. Each comment is one line: location, problem, fix. Use when user says "review this PR", "code review", "review the diff", "/review", or invokes /caveman-review. Auto-triggers when reviewing pull requests.

- Skill: `rheinmir/caveman-review` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add rheinmir/caveman-review`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/rheinmir/caveman-review/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: rheinmir (https://skillmd.com/u/rheinmir)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/rheinmir/caveman-review

---


Write code review comments terse and actionable. One line per finding. Location, problem, fix. No throat-clearing.

## Rules

**Format:** `L<line>: <problem>. <fix>.` — or `<file>:L<line>: ...` when reviewing multi-file diffs.

**Severity prefix (optional, when mixed):**
- `🔴 bug:` — broken behavior, will cause incident
- `🟡 risk:` — works but fragile (race, missing null check, swallowed error)
- `🔵 nit:` — style, naming, micro-optim. Author can ignore
- `❓ q:` — genuine question, not a suggestion

**Drop:**
- "I noticed that...", "It seems like...", "You might want to consider..."
- "This is just a suggestion but..." — use `nit:` instead
- "Great work!", "Looks good overall but..." — say it once at the top, not per comment
- Restating what the line does — the reviewer can read the diff
- Hedging ("perhaps", "maybe", "I think") — if unsure use `q:`

**Keep:**
- Exact line numbers
- Exact symbol/function/variable names in backticks
- Concrete fix, not "consider refactoring this"
- The *why* if the fix isn't obvious from the problem statement

## Examples

❌ "I noticed that on line 42 you're not checking if the user object is null before accessing the email property. This could potentially cause a crash if the user is not found in the database. You might want to add a null check here."

✅ `L42: 🔴 bug: user can be null after .find(). Add guard before .email.`

❌ "It looks like this function is doing a lot of things and might benefit from being broken up into smaller functions for readability."

✅ `L88-140: 🔵 nit: 50-line fn does 4 things. Extract validate/normalize/persist.`

❌ "Have you considered what happens if the API returns a 429? I think we should probably handle that case."

✅ `L23: 🟡 risk: no retry on 429. Wrap in withBackoff(3).`

## Auto-Clarity

Drop terse mode for: security findings (CVE-class bugs need full explanation + reference), architectural disagreements (need rationale, not just a one-liner), and onboarding contexts where the author is new and needs the "why". In those cases write a normal paragraph, then resume terse for the rest.

## Boundaries

Reviews only — does not write the code fix, does not approve/request-changes, does not run linters. Output the comment(s) ready to paste into the PR. "stop caveman-review" or "normal mode": revert to verbose review style.

---

## Output Report

After all main skill tasks complete, write a propose draft to the wiki.

### Steps

**1. Build the filename:**
- Format: `DDMMYY-<ten>.md`
- `DDMMYY` = today (e.g., `020626` for 2 June 2026)
- `<ten>` = 2–4 kebab-case words summarising what was done (e.g., `landing-page-coteccons`, `brand-kit-fintech`, `ingest-auth-spec`)

**2. Write** `llmwiki/wiki/draft/cave/DDMMYY-<ten>.md`:

```
# DDMMYY-<ten>
**Type:** draft
**Status:** proposed
**Tags:** <skill-name>, output-report
**Proposed:** YYYY-MM-DD

## What
<One sentence — what this skill invocation produced or decided>

## Output
<Key artefacts, files created/modified, or decisions made>

## Files
| File | Action |
|------|--------|
| `path/to/file` | created / modified |

## Notes
- Invoked via: `/<skill-name>` skill

## Origin
- **Draft:** `wiki/draft/cave/DDMMYY-<ten>.md`
- **Commit:** _(filled by verify-before-commit)_
- **Date promoted:** _(filled by verify-before-commit)_
```

**3. Update wiki index & log:**
- `llmwiki/wiki/index.md` — append one row: `| [DDMMYY-<ten>](draft/cave/DDMMYY-<ten>.md) | draft | YYYY-MM-DD |`
- `llmwiki/wiki/log.md` — append: `## YYYY-MM-DD — <skill-name> — <ten>`

> Skip only when the skill produces zero artefacts and zero decisions (e.g., a pure display mode like `/caveman-stats`).