# Plan Project > Turn a description of a project's end goal into a project plan — success criteria, milestones, and a numbered work breakdown that plan-work can pick up item by item. Covers both a new codebase built from nothing and a large body of work inside an existing one. Use when the user describes something they want to build or change at the scale of weeks rather than hours, wants to start a new app, service, tool, or library from scratch, asks for a roadmap, wants an epic or initiative broken down, or asks how to approach a project. - Skill: `ryanalexanderbrashear/plan-project` (Agent Skill) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add ryanalexanderbrashear/plan-project` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/ryanalexanderbrashear/plan-project/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: Product & Planning - Author: ryanalexanderbrashear (https://skillmd.com/u/ryanalexanderbrashear) - Updated: 2026-09-22 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/ryanalexanderbrashear/plan-project --- # Plan a project from its end goal Turn "here is what I want to exist" into a plan that says what done means, what order the work happens in, and what could sink it. A finished result is a plan the user has approved, ending in a numbered work breakdown where each item is small enough for `plan-work` to plan in detail when it comes up. This skill decides **what** gets built and **in what order**. It does not decide **how** any single piece is built — that is `plan-work`, one plan per work item, written when the item is next up rather than all at once. **"Project" means either of two things here, and the skill covers both:** - **Greenfield** — something that does not exist yet: a new app, service, tool, library, or repository, started from nothing. - **Brownfield** — a large body of work inside a codebase that already exists: a migration, a rewrite, a major feature, paying down a class of debt. They differ in where the constraints come from, not in the shape of the plan — the platform and what it must integrate with, or the code that is already there. Both need success criteria, milestones and a work breakdown; the steps below say where the two diverge. ## When to use - The user describes an end goal and wants it turned into a plan: "I want X to exist", "we need to move off Y", "here's the pitch, how would we do it". - The user wants to start something new — an app, service, CLI, library, or repository that does not exist yet — and needs it scoped before the first commit. - The user asks for a roadmap, a breakdown of an epic or initiative, or how to sequence a large piece of work in an existing codebase. - The work will span many changes and cannot land in one pull request. Do not use this for a single bug or feature — that is `plan-work`, and running a project plan over one change buries it in ceremony. Do not use it to stress-test a plan the user already has; that is `grill-me`. ## Instructions ### 1. Scope it before planning it A vague end goal is the normal input. Close the gap with one focused round of questions, asked together rather than one at a time, and put your recommended answer next to each so the user can accept rather than compose: - **What is true when this is done?** Push for a condition that can be checked from the outside, not an activity that can be performed. - **What is deliberately not included?** The non-goals prevent more scope creep later than any other question here. - **What constrains it?** Deadline, people available, platforms, systems that cannot be changed, decisions already made elsewhere. - **How big is the appetite?** A week, a quarter, and "whatever it takes" are three different projects for the same goal. Ask before choosing an approach, because the answer decides which approaches are even eligible. - **What happens to the existing thing?** For a replacement or migration: does it run in parallel, get cut over, or stay for some users indefinitely. For a greenfield project, also settle what a brownfield one already answers for you: - **Who runs it and where?** The deployment target, the platform, and who operates it once it exists. This constrains the stack more than taste does. - **What does it have to interoperate with?** Existing services, auth, data formats, a house style. A new project is rarely as unconstrained as it looks. - **Is the stack chosen, or is choosing it part of the project?** If it is open, say so in the plan and treat it as an early decision with an owner — not as something to settle silently by writing the first file. - **Who is the first user, and when do they see it?** A greenfield project with no near-term user drifts. The answer sets the first milestone. Do not ask what the codebase can answer. Ask only what changes the plan. ### 2. Establish the starting point Find out what is actually there before planning against it. **In an existing codebase**, read it. Find what the project can build on, what is in the way, and the constraints the code imposes regardless of anyone's preference. Cite files and lines — a plan grounded in the real system survives contact with it. **For a greenfield project** there is no code to read, but there is always a starting point, and skipping this step is how a new project gets planned in a vacuum. Establish instead: - **Prior art.** A sibling repo, an existing service doing something similar, or a previous attempt at the same thing. Read it, and say what to copy and what to avoid. - **House conventions.** The languages, frameworks, CI, and deployment the team already uses. Diverging is allowed but it is a decision, and it belongs in the plan as one. - **The integration surface.** The APIs, schemas, and auth the new thing must speak to, which are as binding as any existing code would be. - **What genuinely is unknown.** A new project's biggest risk is usually a question nobody has answered yet, not a line of code. Name those — they drive the milestone order in the next step. Distinguish what you verified from what you assumed, and mark the assumptions. ### 3. Choose the shape, then the milestones Decide the approach, and say what you rejected and why — at project scale these are the expensive decisions to revisit. Then break it into milestones, each defined by an **outcome** rather than by activity, each leaving the system in a working state someone can look at. Sequence them to **retire the biggest unknown first**: the milestone order that learns the most, earliest, beats the one that feels most orderly. If a project has a part nobody is sure is possible, that part goes first. For a greenfield project, the first milestone is a **walking skeleton**: the thinnest slice that runs end to end in its real environment — deployed, wired up, and doing one trivial thing for real. It is tempting to make M1 "set up the repo and the tooling", but scaffolding proves nothing and hides the integration risks until late. A skeleton that runs retires the deployment, auth, and build questions on day one, when they are still cheap. Plan the first milestone tightly and later ones coarsely. Detail at distance is fiction, and it gets rewritten twice. ### 4. Break it into work items Number them. Each is one unit of work with a done-condition that fits in a sentence — if it does not, split it. Note which milestone it belongs to and what it depends on. Size them so a single `plan-work` plan and a single pull request can cover one. Do not write those plans now; the whole point of the split is that each item is planned when it comes up, with what the earlier items taught. ### 5. Write the plan where it belongs Follow `~/.claude/skills/docs/project-template.md` (repo path: `docs/project-template.md`). A project plan outlives the session and gets linked from many pull requests, so it belongs in the repository — `docs/projects/.md` — not in a temp directory. **Before writing it there, check whether the repository is public:** ```bash gh repo view --json visibility -q .visibility # if gh is available git remote get-url origin # otherwise infer and ask ``` If the repository is public, or you cannot tell, stop and ask the user where the plan should go before writing it. A project plan routinely contains deadlines, staffing, commercial reasoning, and unreleased intentions that the code does not — publishing it is not reversible. Offer, in order: an ignored path inside the repo (add it to `.gitignore`), a private location outside the repo, or the session scratchpad. Only commit a plan to a public repository when the user has said so explicitly. Tell the user the full path either way. ### 6. Iterate, then keep it alive Hand over the path with a short summary: the approach in a couple of sentences, the milestone sequence in one line, and the open questions. Do not paste the plan into the conversation. Edit the file in place as the user pushes back. Keep the open questions current, and mark which ones block starting versus which can wait. Once work begins the plan is live: update item status as work lands, link its pull requests, and re-plan later milestones as earlier ones teach you something. That re-planning is the design working, not a failure of the original plan. ### 7. Audit at every milestone boundary When a milestone's last item merges, audit before starting the next, and put the audit in the plan as part of the sequence so it is scheduled rather than recalled. Follow `~/.claude/skills/docs/milestone-audit.md` (repo path: `docs/milestone-audit.md`): **audit by using the thing, not by reading the list**, record the verdict beside the milestone, and schedule what it found as items. ## Guidelines - Do not write implementation code, and do not write the per-item `plan-work` plans. Both are later steps, and doing them now wastes what the early work would have taught. - Recommend an answer to every question you ask and every open question you leave. A question without a recommendation hands the work back to the user. - Prefer the smallest project that reaches the stated goal. Note the adjacent ambitions under Out of scope instead of absorbing them — projects fail by accumulation far more often than by under-reach. - Make success criteria checkable. "Better performance" cannot be delivered; "p95 under 400ms" can. - **Assume production, and decide observability with the skeleton.** A correlated request id is one wrapper in M1 and every call site later. - Say when the goal is unclear enough that planning it would be theatre, and ask rather than producing a confident-looking plan over a guess. - If the work turns out to fit in one change, say so and offer `plan-work` instead.