# Anti AI Slop Content Creation

> Create or revise human-sounding content that is specific, useful, evidence-aware, and resistant to generic AI phrasing. Use for posts, essays, newsletters, web copy, applications, and other human-facing prose.

- Skill: `santos-sanz/anti-ai-slop-content-creation` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 5 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add santos-sanz/anti-ai-slop-content-creation`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/santos-sanz/anti-ai-slop-content-creation/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: santos-sanz (https://skillmd.com/u/santos-sanz)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/santos-sanz/anti-ai-slop-content-creation

---


# Anti-AI-Slop Content Creation

Use $ARGUMENTS as initial context.

## When to use this skill
- The user needs public-facing or human-facing prose with a clear point of view.
- A draft sounds generic, inflated, repetitive, over-polished, or disconnected from real experience.
- Source material, observations, or evidence must become a natural story, argument, or useful explanation.

## When not to use this skill
- Do not use it to invent first-person experience, credentials, quotes, sources, metrics, or outcomes.
- Do not replace legal, regulatory, medical, financial, or safety review with a style edit.
- Do not apply a rigid banned-word list to technical text where precision depends on the term.

## Required inputs
- Audience, purpose, channel, length, and desired reader action.
- Source material: facts, observations, examples, draft, or lived experience supplied by the user.
- Voice constraints, claims that require verification, and words or ideas that must remain.
- Any privacy, attribution, consent, or brand constraints.

## Workflow
1. Define the reader, job to be done, central point, and format constraint.
2. Inventory source material and separate verified facts, personal observations, inferences, and gaps.
3. Find the human angle: a concrete scene, tension, choice, failure, trade-off, or useful consequence.
4. Draft from specifics toward meaning; use plain language, varied rhythm, and an honest point of view.
5. Audit every paragraph for generic abstraction, unearned certainty, repetition, filler, and evidence drift.
6. Replace slop markers with a concrete detail, mechanism, example, or deletion; do not add invented color.
7. Run a final source, attribution, privacy, and reader-value check before delivery.

## Ask-first questions
Ask up to 3 questions before drafting:
1. Who is the reader, what should they understand or do, and where will this appear?
2. Which concrete facts, observations, scenes, or experience may I safely use?
3. What voice, length, attribution, privacy, or factual boundaries must remain intact?

## Assumption policy
- If source material is thin, write a useful outline or marked draft instead of fabricating detail.
- Label invented placeholders as placeholders and never let them pass as final facts.
- Preserve uncertainty when the evidence is partial or the user's experience is ambiguous.
- Treat “make it sound human” as a request for specificity and honest voice, not deceptive authorship claims.

## Output contract
Always produce these sections in order:
1. Context and audience
2. Core point and human angle
3. Source inventory
4. Draft
5. Anti-slop audit
6. Verification and attribution
7. Next actions
8. Assumptions
- The draft must be grounded in supplied or verified material.
- The audit names removed filler, remaining uncertainty, and any sentence needing user confirmation.
- Every next action includes an owner, due date, and success signal.

## Guardrails
- Never invent personal experience, quotes, credentials, metrics, sources, or outcomes.
- Replace generic abstraction with a specific fact, mechanism, example, or deletion.
- Preserve the user's voice and meaning; do not flatten distinctive language into a template.
- Keep claims proportional to evidence and disclose attribution or AI assistance when required.
- Do not use emotional pressure, fake urgency, or manufactured vulnerability as a shortcut to engagement.

## Handoffs
- Use `research-evidence-synthesis` when a claim or source is missing or needs verification.
- Use `pyramid-principle-structured-communication` when the content must drive an executive decision.
- Use `persuasion-cialdini-influence-design` when the primary job is ethical influence and a call to action.
- Use `difficult-conversations-feedback` when the content is a sensitive interpersonal message rather than public prose.

## Resources
- `references/slop-patterns.md` - Slop signals, diagnostic questions, and concrete remedies.
- `references/voice-and-evidence.md` - Voice preservation, source discipline, and attribution checks.
- `templates/content-creation.md` - Human-facing content creation template.
- `examples/content-creation-example.md` - Golden example with source boundaries and an anti-slop audit.

## Keywords
AI slop, anti-slop, content creation, human writing, voice, specificity, editing, storytelling, copywriting, authenticity