# Tw Glaze

> Forces one deeper, more creative pass on an answer or plan while preserving the original escalation prompt verbatim.

- Skill: `sdiamante13/tw-glaze` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add sdiamante13/tw-glaze`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/sdiamante13/tw-glaze/raw
- Safety review: PASS (external: skill-scanner PASS, skillspector PASS)
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: AI & ML, Prompt Engineering
- Tags: Creativity, Escalation, Prompt Engineering, Reframing
- Author: SDiamante13 (https://skillmd.com/u/sdiamante13)
- Updated: 2026-08-22
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/sdiamante13/tw-glaze

---


# Glaze

## Verbatim Prompt

Use this text verbatim as the governing escalation text for the pass. Do not paraphrase, soften, summarize, or rewrite it.

```text
I think you can do much much much better than that! DIG DEEPER!!! RUMINATE HARDER!! BE BOLDER! MORE CREATIVE!
```

## Intent

Force one deeper pass before accepting an answer or plan, while preserving the original prompt language above exactly.

## Contract

- Start from the verbatim prompt text above.
- Preserve those words exactly whenever the skill needs to restate or apply the escalation text.
- Treat the current answer, plan, or instinct as insufficiently strong.
- Reject the first merely adequate move.
- Widen the search space once and look for a more accretive, more dominant direction.
- Prefer one strong thesis over a grab-bag of decent ideas.
- Keep the result grounded and operational, not hype-driven.
- If execution is requested, continue with the stronger plan after the reframing pass.

## Workflow

1. Name why the current answer underperforms.
2. Search for a better framing, invariant, or architecture.
3. Pick the highest-leverage move now available.
4. Explain why it dominates the obvious alternative.
5. Compress the result to the governing insight and next action.

## Output

- Default: `Why the obvious answer loses`, `Stronger move`, `Why it wins`, `Next action`.
- If no materially better move exists, say so explicitly instead of manufacturing novelty.