# Deaify Text

> Remove AI fingerprints from text using 4 parallel critics. Use when text sounds robotic or generic.

- Skill: `serejaris/deaify-text` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add serejaris/deaify-text`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/serejaris/deaify-text/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: serejaris (https://skillmd.com/u/serejaris)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/serejaris/deaify-text

---


# De-AI-fy Text

Убирает AI-отпечатки из текста через параллельных критиков и итеративное переписывание.

## When to Use

- Текст "звучит как AI написал"
- Ровный ритм, предсказуемая структура
- Шаблонные фразы без конкретики
- Нет авторского голоса
- Технический контент с версиями, датами (нужна проверка фактов)

## Core Pattern

```
┌──────────────┐
│  Read text   │
└──────┬───────┘
       │
       ▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│           Launch 4 PARALLEL critics              │
├────────────┬────────────┬────────────┬───────────┤
│ Critic A   │ Critic B   │ Critic C   │ Critic D  │
│ Generic    │ Rhythm     │ Missing    │ Fact      │
│ phrases    │ problems   │ specifics  │ checker   │
└─────┬──────┴─────┬──────┴─────┬──────┴─────┬─────┘
      │            │            │            │
      │            │            │            ▼
      │            │            │    Web verify flagged
      │            │            │            │
      ▼            ▼            ▼            ▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│              Aggregate critiques                 │
└──────────────────────┬───────────────────────────┘
                       │
                       ▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│           Rewrite with constraints               │
└──────────────────────┬───────────────────────────┘
                       │
                       ▼
              Shorter or same length?
                 │           │
               yes          no
                 │           │
                 ▼           ▼
              Done       Cut bloat → Done
```

---

## Critic Prompts

**Запусти все 4 критика параллельно** (в отдельных чатах/subagents или последовательно если параллельность недоступна):

### Critic A — Generic Detector

```
Find AI-typical phrases in this text:
- "важно понимать", "следует отметить", "в заключение"
- "Это не X — это Y" dramatic contrasts
- Sentences without specific names/numbers/dates
- Abstract claims without examples

Output: numbered list with exact quotes and line references.
```

### Critic B — Rhythm Analyzer

```
Analyze text rhythm:
- Find 3+ consecutive sentences of similar length
- Find paragraphs where all sentences start similarly
- Check burstiness: ratio of shortest to longest sentence

EXCEPTION: Do NOT flag sequential/step lists.
These help readers scan. Only flag lists where structure adds no value.

Output: specific locations that need rhythm variation.
```

### Critic C — Specificity Checker

```
Where could author add:
- Personal experience ("I tried this and...")
- Specific number or statistic
- Name/company/date reference
- Opinion marker ("я думаю", "по-моему")

Output: 3-5 specific suggestions with WHERE to insert.
```

### Critic D — Fact Checker

```
Extract all verifiable claims from this text:
- Software/model versions (GPT-4, Claude 3, Gemini 2.0)
- Release dates and timelines
- Company names, product names, tool names
- Statistics, percentages, numbers

For each claim, flag if:
- Model/version might be outdated (AI models older than 6 months)
- Date doesn't match current year context
- Tool/product might be deprecated or renamed
- Statistic seems made up (round numbers, no source)

Output: numbered list of claims that need web verification.
Format: "[CLAIM]: {exact quote}" + "[FLAG]: {why suspicious}"
```

---

## Fact Verification Step

**После Critic D — проверь каждый flagged claim через web search:**

```
Для каждого claim:
  Web search: "{product/model name} latest version 2026"

  Сравни claim с результатами.
  Если устарело: предоставь актуальное значение.
```

---

## Rewriter Constraints

После агрегации критик, перепиши с HARD RULES:

1. **Length cap:** Output ≤ original word count
2. **Vary sentence length:** Mix 3-word and 20-word sentences
3. **Kill generic phrases:** Replace every flagged phrase
4. **Add ONE personal touch:** "Я видел как...", "Помню когда..."
5. **Break one grammar rule:** Start with "И" or "Но", use fragment

---

## What to PRESERVE

- **Sequential/step lists** — "Как это работает", numbered workflows
- **Code examples** — don't touch
- **Technical specs** — configs, commands, file paths
- **Comparisons** — if author compares alternatives, keep structure

**Rule:** If a list helps reader skip prose and get the gist — keep it.

---

## Anti-Patterns

| Don't | Why |
|-------|-----|
| Expand text | AI loves adding "context" — resist |
| Add drama endings | "И это меняет всё." = AI fingerprint |
| Delete useful lists | Sequential steps help scanning |
| Rewrite intro last | Intro sets human tone — do first |

---

## Red Flags — You're Adding AI

- Output longer than input
- "Но факт в том, что..."
- "И вот почему это важно"
- All paragraphs same length
- Ending with rhetorical question

---

## Quick Reference

| AI Pattern | Human Fix |
|------------|-----------|
| Even paragraphs | 1 sentence, then 5, then 2 |
| "Важно отметить" | Delete or replace with specific |
| No dates/names | Add one real reference |
| Abstract claim | Add "например" with concrete case |
| Drama ending | Cut last sentence, end earlier |

---

## Personal touch examples

- ✅ "Я сам перестал заходить на tailwindcss.com"
- ✅ "По-моему, первый вариант самый реальный"
- ❌ "Многие эксперты считают" (generic)
- ❌ "Это важно для индустрии" (abstract)