# Flutter Apply Architecture Best Practices > Apply boundary-first architecture to Flutter/Dart monorepos using Melos, Dart Pub Workspaces, and get_it. Use when changing package boundaries, feature layers, dependency injection, runtime scopes, or workspace validation. - Skill: `siesdart/flutter-apply-architecture-best-practices` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 2 files) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add siesdart/flutter-apply-architecture-best-practices` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/siesdart/flutter-apply-architecture-best-practices/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: Coding & Dev Tools - Author: siesdart (https://skillmd.com/u/siesdart) - Updated: 2026-09-17 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/siesdart/flutter-apply-architecture-best-practices --- # Architecting Flutter Monorepos Use a **boundary-first, depth-aware** process: preserve repository facts, make ownership and dependencies explicit, keep composition in the app, and verify the workspace before declaring the change complete. A boundary is valuable when it hides meaningful complexity behind a small interface; a folder or file is not automatically a module. Read [REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md) for the canonical topology, dependency and abstraction rules, get_it lifetimes and scopes, Melos/Pub Workspace details, examples, verification checklist, and source links. Treat it as the single source of truth for those reference facts. ## Process ### 1. Inventory the workspace Inspect before proposing structure or editing code: - root `pubspec.yaml`, SDK constraint, workspace configuration, and lockfile - root Melos configuration, scripts, filters, and pinned version - every app, package, public entrypoint, and dependency edge - composition roots, `GetIt` instances, registration helpers, scopes, and code generation - tests, analysis configuration, CI commands, and publish settings Separate discovered constraints from recommendations. Completion criterion: every workspace member, relevant dependency edge, DI entrypoint, and validation command is accounted for. ### 2. Choose the smallest useful, deepest boundary Apply the mixed topology in [REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md). Choose boundaries by ownership, public API, lifecycle, independent consumers, release needs, and dependency direction—not by mirroring `presentation`, `application`, `domain`, and `data` as separate packages or files. Keep product composition in `apps/*`; keep capability packages, shared core contracts/UI, and reusable platform integrations in their appropriate package groups. Name packages for their capability, not their directory category. Inside each package, first identify the few concepts that own a meaningful change, lifecycle, or dependency seam. Co-locate their implementation behind a small public surface when callers should not know the internal steps. Treat Clean Architecture layers as dependency and ownership roles, not as a demand for one folder or file per role. Split a module only when the split increases locality, hides substantial complexity, enables an independently meaningful change, or protects a real seam. Apply the deletion test: if deleting the proposed file or folder would merely move complexity into its neighbours, keep it co-located. Prefer a small number of **deep modules** over many **shallow modules**. An interface that is nearly as complicated as its implementation is a warning that the boundary is shallow. An extracted helper or pure function earns its own module only when its interface is a useful test surface or a real seam—not merely because it makes a line easier to unit-test. One adapter is a hypothetical seam; two genuinely different adapters are evidence of a real seam, subject to locality and ownership. Completion criterion: every new package, folder, and file has an explicit boundary or locality reason; each retained boundary hides meaningful complexity; and no package or internal module exists solely to reproduce a layer, isolate a trivial class, or make the tree symmetrical. ### 3. Model dependencies and public APIs Draw the one-way compile-time graph from the canonical dependency model in [REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md) before changing imports. Keep compile-time dependencies distinct from runtime interaction and data flow. Apply the abstraction placement, public API, repository, service, and use-case rules in the reference. Keep pure Dart contracts and business logic free of Flutter dependencies where practical. Completion criterion: every changed import follows the graph, no cycle or app reverse edge exists, every abstraction has a consumer-owned reason, and the public API exposes no accidental implementation detail. ### 4. Make composition explicit Follow the app-owned locator, registration, constructor-injection, lifetime, readiness, replacement, disposal, and lookup rules in the reference. Completion criterion: the app composition root visibly defines registration order, lifetime, async readiness, replacement, disposal, and all collaborators needed by business/application code. ### 5. Own runtime scopes at the app lifecycle Apply the scope ownership, lifecycle, initialization, cleanup, and disposal rules in the reference. Completion criterion: every pushed scope has a named owner, a reachable exit path, awaited cleanup, and tests for parent restoration or replacement. ### 6. Implement the feature in its owning package For each new or changed feature: - confirm the owning package and dependency graph - map the feature into a few cohesive deep modules before creating folders or files; keep the call path for one concept local - define immutable contracts and the public API at the smallest meaningful seam - add stateless services only when an external source needs adaptation - add repositories for transformation, caching, retry, and error policy - add a use case only when Step 3 requires one - implement a view model with immutable UI state and commands - keep rendering, layout, animation, and simple routing in lean views/widgets - add an explicit registration helper and call it from the app composition root - add package unit tests and app integration coverage for user-visible flows Use the feature implementation defaults in the reference. Before finalizing, run the deletion test on every newly introduced file and folder, and check that the interface remains smaller than the complexity it conceals. Completion criterion: each checklist item is implemented or marked unnecessary with a reason, the feature is reachable through its owning package's public API, and the resulting package has no role-shaped shallow-module sprawl. ### 7. Verify the workspace and release posture Run the repository-approved commands for dependency resolution, workspace listing, formatting, analysis, generation, and tests. Use Melos filters for focused feedback, then run the app checks that consume changed packages. Apply `melos bootstrap` only when the repository's hooks or synchronization policy requires it. For every independently deployable package, validate declared dependencies outside the workspace and review public API, version, changelog, and migration impact. Completion criterion: workspace resolution, package and app checks, generated output, dependency-cycle checks, and publishable-package standalone resolution all pass or have a recorded intentional exception. ## Decision guardrails Treat Flutter architecture guidance, get_it, and Melos as repository-serving defaults. Preserve repository policy when it exists. When a materially missing choice affects publishing, state management, ownership, or lifecycle, surface the ambiguity with a recommended option before editing; record the decision in the resulting structure or documentation. When a proposed split is justified only by “Clean Architecture,” ask which complexity the new boundary hides, who owns its interface, and which change can now stay local. If those answers are weak, deepen the existing module instead: co-locate the related roles, narrow the public surface, and test through that surface. Review the final tree for locality and leverage, not for a visually symmetrical set of layer directories.