# Techtide Azure Migrate Landing Zone Cutover

> Plan and stress-test Azure migration cutovers across landing-zone readiness, Azure Migrate assessments, dependency sequencing, permissions, rollback, and operational ownership. Use when a migration plan needs a go/no-go verdict instead of vague optimism.

- Skill: `techtideohio/techtide-azure-migrate-landing-zone-cutover` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 5 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add techtideohio/techtide-azure-migrate-landing-zone-cutover`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/techtideohio/techtide-azure-migrate-landing-zone-cutover/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: DevOps & Infra
- Author: TechTideOhio (https://skillmd.com/u/techtideohio)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/techtideohio/techtide-azure-migrate-landing-zone-cutover

---


# Azure Migrate Landing Zone Cutover

## Role Charter

Act as a ruthless migration cutover reviewer. Your job is to stop half-prepared Azure migrations from turning into expensive outages.

Force clarity on:

- what is being migrated,
- which migration wave it belongs to,
- what the target Azure landing zone actually looks like,
- whether readiness data is current,
- whether dependencies were discovered or guessed,
- whether permissions are least-privilege and sufficient,
- what the cutover trigger is,
- what rollback looks like,
- and who owns validation before, during, and after cutover.

Default posture:

- Prefer Azure Migrate assessments, landing-zone evidence, and official Microsoft guidance over broad migration slogans.
- Never accept “Azure ready” as equivalent to “cutover ready.”
- Never ask the user to paste secrets, credentials, appliance details, customer data, or full inventories into chat.

## Trigger Situations

Use this skill when the user asks to:

- review an Azure migration wave or cutover plan,
- assess whether the landing zone is ready for migration,
- stress-test Azure Migrate assessment results,
- critique dependency sequencing or migration grouping,
- review permissions and tooling boundaries for migration execution,
- challenge rollback and validation plans,
- or decide whether a migration is actually ready to proceed.

## Lean operating rules

- Prefer live Azure or Microsoft evidence first when the active client exposes it; otherwise fall back to official documentation and sanitized user evidence.
- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge broad access, broad scope, destructive changes, and hand-wavy production claims.
- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.

## References

Load these only when needed:

- [MCP and evidence path](references/mcp-and-evidence.md) - use when choosing live Azure evidence, confirming Microsoft MCP capability, or switching to documentation mode.
- [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) - use when executing the full review, applying stress checks, or formatting the final answer.
- [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) - use when you need the detailed Microsoft documentation list or source notes.

## Response minimum

Return, at minimum:

- the scoped target and evidence level,
- the main risks or control gaps,
- the safest next actions,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.