# Pldi Camera Ready > Use when turning an accepted PLDI paper into its PACMPL Issue PLDI article — de-anonymization, acmsmall journal formatting, ACM rights and open-access handling, delivering every author-response commitment, and coordinating the Zenodo artifact and June conference presentation. - Skill: `thedixitjain/pldi-camera-ready` (Agent Skill) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds add thedixitjain/pldi-camera-ready` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/thedixitjain/pldi-camera-ready/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: Research & Search - Author: thedixitjain (https://skillmd.com/u/thedixitjain) - Updated: 2026-09-08 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/thedixitjain/pldi-camera-ready --- # PLDI Camera-Ready Since 2023, "camera-ready" at PLDI means producing a **journal article**: accepted papers appear as PACMPL (Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages), Issue PLDI — Vol 7 for 2023, Vol 8 for 2024, Vol 9 for 2025 (SIGPLAN blog 2022-08-08 and ACM DL, read 2026-07-08). The conference talk in June is downstream of the article, not the other way around: the 2025 wording invited PACMPL Issue PLDI authors to present, without requiring it. Recheck the current instructions — the 2026 camera-ready deadline itself was not visible in accessible renderings (待核实). ## What changes at acceptance | Submission state | Camera-ready state | |---|---| | Anonymous, third-person self-citations | Real authors, ORCIDs, affiliations, acknowledgements, grants restored | | "We will..." sentences in the response | Delivered text, tables, and proofs — reviewers may verify | | acmsmall draft with review margins | acmsmall with ACM rights block, CCS concepts, and final metadata | | Code on an anonymous mirror | Artifact heading to Zenodo with a DOI (see `pldi-artifact-evaluation`) | | No fee questions | Open-access handling under ACM's model | ## Open access, concretely PACMPL is Gold Open Access. As of the check date: the discounted author-side APC was 400 USD, SIGPLAN covers it for authors who cannot pay, ACM Open institutions owe nothing, and ACM became a fully open-access publisher on January 1, 2026 (dl.acm.org/journal/pacmpl, read 2026-07-08). Verify which regime applies to your institution during the rights workflow rather than budgeting from hearsay, and never route the fee question to a student author alone. ## The de-anonymization pass Do this as a diff, not a rewrite: ```bash git diff submission..camera-ready -- paper/ | grep -E '^\+' | \ grep -viE 'author|orcid|acknowledg|grant|funding|\\cite' && \ echo "WARNING: content drift beyond identity restoration" ``` Legitimate additions: author block, acknowledgements, funding, restored first-person self-citations, and the revisions promised in the author response. Anything else — a new claim, a quietly changed number — needs your shepherd's or the chairs' sign-off. Fix any self-citations that were blinded into vagueness: "prior work [12]" may now become "our earlier analysis [12] which this paper extends," with the delta stated plainly. ## PACMPL metadata checklist - Title and author order exactly as approved; changes after acceptance go through the chairs, not the production form. - ORCID for every author; ACM's workflow expects them. - CCS concepts and keywords chosen by where compiler and PL readers will search, not copied from the template sample. - Citations to post-2023 SIGPLAN papers in journal form: *Proc. ACM Program. Lang.* volume, issue (PLDI/POPL/OOPSLA/ICFP), article number — see `pldi-related-work` for the bibliography discipline. - Every axis label and table caption re-read at final size; the single-column layout is unforgiving of figure text scaled for two columns. ## Coordinate the three deliverables The article, the artifact, and the talk ship on different clocks: the article on the production deadline, the artifact on the AE timetable (Zenodo versioning means no artifact camera-ready deadline), and the talk in June — registration for PLDI 2026 opened March 16, 2026. Name one owner for each clock; the classic failure is a perfect article whose artifact DOI still points at a stale pre-response version. ## Output format ```text [Camera-ready status] on track / blocked [Response commitments] delivered: n/n, with section pointers [Identity restoration] author block / ORCID / acknowledgements / self-citations [Open access] ACM Open covered / APC path / SIGPLAN waiver (verify current terms) [Clocks] article: | artifact: | talk: ``` --- **Source:** [`brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills`](https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) → `PLDI-Skills/skills/pldi-camera-ready/SKILL.md`