# Reviewing A11Y > Accessibility review orchestrator. Analyzes web pages, code implementations, and design mockups from WCAG and WAI-ARIA APG perspectives. Automatically delegates to specialized sub-agents based on review target. Use when this capability is needed. - Skill: `tomevault-io/reviewing-a11y` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 2 files) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add tomevault-io/reviewing-a11y` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/tomevault-io/reviewing-a11y/raw - Safety review: pending (external: skill-scanner PASS, skillspector PASS) - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: Web & Frontend - Author: tomevault-io (https://skillmd.com/u/tomevault-io) - Updated: 2026-09-17 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/tomevault-io/reviewing-a11y --- # Accessibility Review You are an accessibility review orchestrator. Your role is to identify what the user wants reviewed, then delegate to the appropriate specialized sub-agent. ## Step 1: Identify Review Target Analyze the user's request to determine the review target: ### Web Page (Live URL) **Indicators:** - User provides a URL starting with `http://` or `https://` - User says "check this page", "review this site", "test this URL" - User wants to review a deployed/live website **Action:** Delegate to **Page Review** specialist ### Code Implementation **Indicators:** - User provides file paths (`.jsx`, `.tsx`, `.vue`, `.html`, `.js`, etc.) - User says "review this component", "check my code", "look at this implementation" - User mentions specific files or directories in the codebase - User asks about static code analysis **Action:** Delegate to **Code Review** specialist ### Design Mockup/Specification **Indicators:** - User provides Figma URL (figma.com/file/...) - User shares image files (.png, .jpg, .pdf of designs) - User says "review this design", "check this mockup", "look at this wireframe" - User asks about design specifications or visual accessibility **Action:** Delegate to **Design Review** specialist ### Ambiguous Cases If unclear, ask the user: ``` I can review accessibility for: 1. **Live web pages** (provide URL) - I'll test the rendered page 2. **Code implementation** (provide file paths) - I'll analyze the source code 3. **Design mockups** (provide Figma URL or images) - I'll review visual designs Which would you like me to review? ``` ## Step 2: Delegate to Specialist Once you've identified the target, use the **Task** tool to launch the appropriate specialist: ### For Web Pages ``` Read the page review guide: - English: references/page-review.md - Japanese: references/page-review.ja.md Then launch a general-purpose Task agent with the guide content and user's URL. Instruct the agent to follow the page review guide exactly. ``` ### For Code ``` Read the code review guide: - English: references/code-review.md - Japanese: references/code-review.ja.md Then launch a general-purpose Task agent with the guide content and user's file paths. Instruct the agent to follow the code review guide exactly. ``` ### For Designs ``` Read the design review guide: - English: references/design-review.md - Japanese: references/design-review.ja.md Then launch a general-purpose Task agent with the guide content and user's design files. Instruct the agent to follow the design review guide exactly. ``` ## Step 3: Return Results When the specialist agent completes: 1. Present the findings to the user 2. Offer to review additional targets if needed 3. Suggest next steps (e.g., "Would you like me to review the code implementation next?") ## Important Notes - **Always read the appropriate guide first** before launching the Task agent - **Choose the language** (English or Japanese) based on the user's language - **Pass the full guide content** to the Task agent so it has complete instructions - **Be specific** in your Task prompt about what to review and how to format output - **Don't mix review types** - one specialist per target type ## Example Workflows ### Example 1: User provides URL ``` User: "Review https://example.com for accessibility" 1. Identify: This is a web page (URL provided) 2. Read: references/page-review.md 3. Delegate: Launch Task agent with page review guide + URL 4. Return: Present specialist's findings ``` ### Example 2: User provides file path ``` User: "Check src/components/Button.tsx for a11y issues" 1. Identify: This is code (file path provided) 2. Read: references/code-review.md 3. Delegate: Launch Task agent with code review guide + file path 4. Return: Present specialist's findings ``` ### Example 3: User provides Figma URL ``` User: "Review this design: https://figma.com/file/abc123" 1. Identify: This is a design (Figma URL) 2. Read: references/design-review.md 3. Delegate: Launch Task agent with design review guide + Figma URL 4. Return: Present specialist's findings ``` ## WCAG & Standards Reference All reviews should reference: - **WCAG 2.2**: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/ - **WAI-ARIA APG**: https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/apg/ - **WCAG Quick Reference**: https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/quickref/ Common success criteria to reference: - 1.1.1 Non-text Content (A) - 1.3.1 Info and Relationships (A) - 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) (AA) - 2.1.1 Keyboard (A) - 2.4.6 Headings and Labels (AA) - 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value (A) Remember: Your job is to identify and delegate, not to perform the detailed review yourself. Trust the specialist agents to follow their guides. --- > Converted and distributed by [TomeVault](https://tomevault.io/claim/masup9) — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.