# Yeachan Heo Oh My Claudecode Agent Doc Discipline

> Agent Doc Discipline

- Skill: `tuyv/yeachan-heo-oh-my-claudecode-agent-doc-discipline` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 3 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add tuyv/yeachan-heo-oh-my-claudecode-agent-doc-discipline`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/tuyv/yeachan-heo-oh-my-claudecode-agent-doc-discipline/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: AI & ML
- Author: tuyv (https://skillmd.com/u/tuyv)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/tuyv/yeachan-heo-oh-my-claudecode-agent-doc-discipline

---


# Agent Doc Discipline

Use this skill to apply a writing-time discipline while creating or editing any document an agent consumes to act: the five surfaces (`CLAUDE.md`, `CONTEXT.md`, `docs/standards/`, `design-system/`, `.omc/skills/`), specs, tickets, and skill files. The test a document must pass: **a fresh agent session can act on it by reading alone.**

Mandatory when: drydock generates surface seeds, the launch C5 sediment pass writes a lesson into a slot. Opt-in for every other edit — but any edit to an agent-facing document should survive these rules.

## When Not to Use

Documents written for humans only: `docs/business/` narrative, ADR decision stories, READMEs for human onboarding. They may still follow the rules where it costs nothing, but they are not held to this discipline.

## The Discipline

**Write for a reader with no chat history.** The document is self-describing: nothing leans on "as discussed", a prior session, or knowledge that lives in someone's head. _Test:_ a brand-new agent session can act on the document by reading alone.

**Every rule checkable and carrying a why.** No "keep it clean" — write the observable condition and the reason. _Test:_ an agent can decide pass/fail from the text alone, and the why is stated next to the rule.

**One meaning, one home.** Each rule or definition has a single authoritative place; duplication is drift waiting to happen. _Test:_ changing a behavior is a one-place edit.

**Never restate what the environment confesses.** Package scripts, directory layouts, `--help` output are lookups, not documents — a copied lookup goes stale. Document only what cannot be found by looking: the unwritten convention, the reason behind a choice, the gotcha. _Test:_ every line survives "can this be looked up elsewhere?".

**Steps first, reference behind, rare material behind a pointer.** What to do, in order, at the top; consult-on-demand rules below; low-frequency material pushed behind a pointer whose wording names the branches that should trigger reaching it. _Test:_ the next action is findable within the first screen.

**Every step ends on a completion criterion.** Done must be tellable from not-done — a vague bound invites premature completion. _Test:_ for each step, "how do I know this is finished?" has an answer in the text.

**Prompt the positive.** State the target behavior; a prohibition is reserved for hard guardrails and is always paired with the positive target. _Test:_ every prohibition in the document names the thing to do instead.

**Scrape barnacles on write.** When the document contains stale or redundant material, remove it in the same edit; when it does not, add only the required material and do not invent deletions. A sentence the model already obeys by default pays load for nothing — delete the whole sentence. _Test:_ every line re-read earns its place against "does this change behavior versus the default?", and any stale or redundant material found during the edit is gone.

## Verification

Before reporting a document change done, confirm:

- a fresh session could act on it without asking a human anything
- every rule is checkable and states its why; no rule restates a lookup
- meanings live in one place; pointers name their trigger branches
- stale or redundant material found during the edit was removed, while valid unrelated content was preserved