# Partner Capability Assessment > Evaluate a consulting or engineering firm's demonstrated capacity to deploy Claude, using the signals the Claude Certification Program and the Claude Partner Network actually produce — proctored role-based credentials, certified practitioner counts, deployed customers, and public customer references. Use when selecting a delivery partner for a Claude deployment, when vetting who will work on your systems, when a firm cites certification numbers and you need to know what they mean, or when a firm is planning its own advance through the partner network tiers. - Skill: `uygnoey/partner-capability-assessment` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 3 files) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add uygnoey/partner-capability-assessment` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/uygnoey/partner-capability-assessment/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: DevOps & Infra - Author: uygnoey (https://skillmd.com/u/uygnoey) - Updated: 2026-09-21 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/uygnoey/partner-capability-assessment --- # Assessing a partner's demonstrated Claude capacity The Claude Certification Program is designed to give enterprises confidence in the partner they are selecting. That only works if the buyer reads the credentials correctly: a certification says a named individual was tested on a named role's skills, and a network tier says something about the firm as a whole. The two answer different questions. ## Instructions ### 1. Read a credential as validated capability, not attendance Certification represents validated capability, rather than course attendance: - Every exam is **proctored** and **identity-verified**. - Each exam was designed by subject matter experts, including Anthropic's own Applied AI team, to reflect real work that's done in the field. - A certification establishes that this individual has demonstrated the skills their role demands. So the question "did your people take the training?" is the wrong one. The question is "which exams did they pass, and what do those exams test?" ### 2. Match credentials to the roles you are buying Credentials are matched to role-specific skills. Each credential maps to one of the four roles that put Claude into production — from everyday practical use, to building with the Claude API, to architecting large-scale enterprise deployments. The design intent is that **the buyer knows what a certified person was tested on**. Check that the mix on the proposed team matches the work you need: | You are buying | Look for | |---|---| | Advisory and everyday delivery work | Claude Certified Associate: Foundations | | Application building against the Claude API, tool use, agents | Claude Certified Developer: Foundations | | Agent system design | Claude Certified Architect: Foundations | | Integration architecture, governance, and evaluation at enterprise scale | Claude Certified Architect: Professional | A firm with a large headline number but no Architect: Professional credentials is not staffed for enterprise-scale integration, governance, and evaluation. See [references/verification-signals.md](references/verification-signals.md). ### 3. Read the firm's tier standing as a separate signal The Claude Partner Network describes a firm's demonstrated capacity. **Tier standing combines certified practitioners with deployed customers and public customer references** — so it is not a restatement of the certification count. The top tier, Global Premier, requires all three at once: - 1,000 certified practitioners - 100 customers across three regions - 15 public customer endorsements Full tier detail, including when standing is re-evaluated, is in [references/network-tiers.md](references/network-tiers.md). ### 4. Verify the badge, not the claim Passing an exam produces a digital badge through **Credly by Pearson**, and completed certifications are recognized with **partner badges** showing demonstrated expertise in a specific product area. Ask for the badges of the named individuals who will actually work on your systems, rather than a firm-wide total. Certified practitioner counts are used to determine tier standing and are relevant when companies vet who will work on their systems — which is exactly why the assessment behind them is proctored and identity-verified. ### 5. Discount stated commitments against delivered counts Many firms have publicly committed to future certification numbers. A commitment is a plan; a certified practitioner count is a fact. Keep them in separate columns when comparing firms, and note the horizon attached to each commitment — some are dated ("before 2027", "within 18 months", "by the end of 2026") and some are not. ## Examples - **Two firms, same headline number.** Both claim "10,000 certifications." One's mix is almost entirely Associate: Foundations; the other has thousands of Developer and Architect credentials. For a build-heavy agent deployment, only the second is staffed for the work — the credentials are matched to role-specific skills precisely so this distinction is visible. - **A firm citing tier standing alone.** Global Premier standing implies 1,000 certified practitioners *and* 100 customers across three regions *and* 15 public customer endorsements. If a firm cites the tier as proof of certification depth, ask which of the three components carries it. - **Vetting the named team.** A proposal lists six people. Ask for six Credly badges. Certification is per-individual and identity-verified, so a per-person check is meaningful in a way a firm-wide count is not. - **A firm planning its own advance.** Certifications determine how firms advance in the network, and the next tier review where the criteria is evaluated across the network is October 1. A firm short on any one of the three Global Premier components should be working the component it is short on, not adding more of the one it already clears. - **Reading a commitment.** "Will certify 20,000 professionals" is a stated commitment. "Has 36,000 consultants certified across 1,300+ organizations" is the program-wide delivered figure as of July 2026. Compare like with like. ## Source ["Four role-based certifications for the people who put Claude to work for customers"](https://claude.com/blog/four-role-based-claude-certifications) — Anthropic, July 23, 2026.