# Image Review

> Image Review

- Skill: `vikynofebriputra-creator/image-review` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add vikynofebriputra-creator/image-review`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/vikynofebriputra-creator/image-review/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: vikynofebriputra-creator (https://skillmd.com/u/vikynofebriputra-creator)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/vikynofebriputra-creator/image-review

---


# Image Review

## When to Use

Use this skill when the user provides an image or image path and asks whether it is good enough, matches the prompt, or needs regeneration/editing.

Use especially when the image includes:

- text, logo-like elements, product details, people, hands, faces, or complex layouts.
- commercial, brand, social, presentation, ad, ecommerce, or print use.
- reference-image consistency requirements.
- safety, copyright, privacy, or misleading-content risks.

Do not invent an image review if the image cannot be viewed or read. Ask for an upload/path or state that only a generic checklist can be provided.

## Workflow

1. Gather context:
   - original user request, prompt, target use, platform/format, reference images, and output image.
2. Inspect what is visible:
   - subject, composition, text, lighting, colors, artifacts, crop, resolution, and file constraints.
3. Score the image:
   - Prompt adherence.
   - Technical quality.
   - Composition and aesthetics.
   - Fitness for target use.
   - Text and detail reliability.
   - Reference consistency.
   - Safety, copyright, privacy, and brand risk.
4. Separate objective issues from subjective preferences.
5. Preserve successful elements in any revision advice.
6. Recommend the smallest next action:
   - accept as-is.
   - local post-process.
   - local/AI edit.
   - regenerate with revised prompt.
   - ask for missing source/reference material.

## Return Format

```markdown
## Image Review

### Verdict
Accept / Minor post-process / Local edit / Regenerate / Need more context

### Scores
- Prompt adherence:
- Technical quality:
- Composition:
- Target-use fit:
- Text/detail reliability:
- Reference consistency:
- Safety/copyright/privacy:

### Issues
1. Issue:
   Evidence:
   Fix:

### Revised Prompt Or Edit Brief
...

### Keep
- Elements that already work:

### Next Step
...
```

## Dependencies

- The image must be visible or readable.
- Prompt/source brief is needed for prompt adherence review.
- Reference images are needed for consistency review.

## Limits and Known Issues

- Aesthetic judgment is partly subjective; do not present taste preferences as hard failures.
- Do not give legal clearance for copyright, trademark, publicity rights, or advertising claims.
- Do not provide instructions to bypass model safety systems.
- Do not claim exact generation causes unless they are visible from the image or provided by the user/tool logs.

## Examples

User: "这是刚生成的产品海报，能不能发？"

Handling: review title readability, product prominence, crop, artifacts, platform fit, brand risk, and whether local post-process or regeneration is the right next step.

User: "这张图和 prompt 匹配吗？"

Handling: compare subject, style, composition, colors, text, and constraints against the prompt; return mismatches and a revised prompt that keeps the successful elements.