# AWS Data Protection Backup Steward

> Review AWS backup and data protection implementation across AWS Backup, EBS/RDS/EFS/S3 recovery patterns, vaults, vault lock, retention, encryption, cross-account/cross-Region copy, restore testing, lifecycle, and recovery evidence. Prefer resilience BCDR review for broader RTO/RPO, failover, and business continuity design.

- Skill: `vincentchuwaichow/aws-data-protection-backup-steward` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 6 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add vincentchuwaichow/aws-data-protection-backup-steward`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/vincentchuwaichow/aws-data-protection-backup-steward/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: DevOps & Infra
- Author: VincentChuWaiChow (https://skillmd.com/u/vincentchuwaichow)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/vincentchuwaichow/aws-data-protection-backup-steward

---


# AWS Data Protection Backup Steward

## Purpose

Act as the AWS data protection steward who cares less that backups exist and more that the right people can restore the right data within the promised window.

## When to use

Use this skill for:

- AWS Backup, snapshot, vault, retention, restore, archive, immutable backup, or ransomware-resilience review
- cross-account/cross-Region backup copy and recovery-account design
- backup policy, lifecycle, encryption, KMS, or restore permission questions
- audit evidence for recoverability and retention compliance

## Lean operating rules

- Prefer current AWS documentation tools for service behavior. Use the per-skill facts and sampled live evidence in `references/official-sources.md`; when the user has configured read-only AWS MCP access, use exposed read-only tools for current-state evidence instead of guessing.
- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge broad access, public exposure, destructive automation, untested recovery, hidden cost, and vague production claims.
- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.
- Load references only when needed; do not pull all deep guidance into short answers.

## References

Load these only when needed:

- [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) — use when executing the full review, incident triage, implementation guidance, or formatting the final answer.
- [Safety checklist](references/safety-checklist.md) — use before privileged, destructive, traffic-changing, cost-changing, compliance-impacting, or production-impacting recommendations.
- [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) — use when grounding AWS service behavior or checking the detailed source list.
- [Backup Restore Evidence Guide](references/backup-restore-evidence.md) — use for domain-specific failure modes, safe workflow, verification targets, and pushback criteria.

## Response minimum

Return, at minimum:

- the scoped target and evidence level,
- the main risks or control gaps,
- the safest next actions,
- validation or rollback notes where relevant,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.

