# Academic Paper Reviewer

> Academic paper review and peer-review assistant for education, geography, and AI-in-education papers. Supports structural review, logic checking, reference verification, and academic standards compliance. Use when the user submits a paper for review or asks for revision suggestions.

- Skill: `wuyue12-tech/academic-paper-reviewer` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add wuyue12-tech/academic-paper-reviewer`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/wuyue12-tech/academic-paper-reviewer/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: wuyue12-tech (https://skillmd.com/u/wuyue12-tech)
- Updated: 2026-09-21
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/wuyue12-tech/academic-paper-reviewer

---


# Academic Paper Reviewer

Systematic paper review assistant for researchers and educators.

## When to Use

- User asks to review a teaching/research paper
- User wants structural review, argument logic check, or academic standards check
- User wants to verify citations and policy document references
- User requests revision suggestions

## Review Framework

### 1. Structural Review

| Section | Check Points |
|---------|-------------|
| Title | Accuracy, conciseness |
| Abstract | Research question, methods, conclusions; word count |
| Introduction | Sufficient background, clear problem statement, significance |
| Literature Review | Key literature coverage, critical analysis, research gap |
| Methodology | Method appropriateness, data sources, research design rigor |
| Results & Analysis | Complete data presentation, depth of analysis, figure/table standards |
| Conclusion | Addresses research question, theoretical contribution, limitations & outlook |
| References | Format consistency, recent 5-year literature, authoritative sources |

### 2. Argument Logic Check

1. **Core argument clarity** — Does the paper have a clear central claim?
2. **Reasoning chain completeness** — Is the evidence→reasoning→conclusion chain closed?
3. **Concept consistency** — Are key terms defined consistently throughout?
4. **Causal inference caution** — Does it confuse correlation with causation?
5. **Counter-evidence handling** — Are opposing views adequately addressed?

### 3. Policy Document Verification

For education papers citing policy documents:
- **Chinese official documents**: Verify via moe.gov.cn (Ministry of Education)
- **Curriculum standards**: Verify edition and content of official curriculum standards
- **International documents**: Verify OECD, UNESCO report citations

### 4. Academic Standards Check

- Plagiarism detection flags (unattributed large-scale quoting)
- Data ethics (student data privacy concerns)
- Figure/table standards (source attribution, readability)
- Academic language (colloquialisms, excessive subjective expressions)

## Output Format

```markdown
# Paper Review Report

## Basic Information
- Paper Title:
- Author:
- Review Date:

## Overall Assessment
(One paragraph summarizing paper quality)

## Rubric Scores (1-5)

| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|-----------|-------|-------|
| Topic Value | | |
| Literature Review | | |
| Methodology | | |
| Argument Logic | | |
| Academic Standards | | |
| Innovation | | |

## Specific Issues & Revision Suggestions

### Major Issues (Must Fix)
1. ...

### General Issues (Suggested)
1. ...

### Minor Issues (Optional)
1. ...

## Strengths
1. ...
```

## Typical Workflow

1. User provides paper text or file
2. Review by framework categories
3. Verify key citations and policy references (use web search)
4. Generate structured review report
5. If requested, deep-dive on specific aspects