British Journal Of Political Science Skills

Agent skill stack for manuscripts targeted at the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS / BJPolS) — a leading general political-science journal published by Cambridge University Press, submitted under double-blind peer review across three formats: Research Articles (~10,000 words), Letters (short articles, ~4,000 words), and Comments. BJPS is broad and internationally oriented, covering all s

by @brycewang-stanford 12 skills

Install

npx skillmds@latest add plugin:brycewang-stanford/british-journal-of-political-science-skills

One command, no setup. In Claude Code it lands as a managed plugin you can enable, disable or remove with /plugin. On any other agent it installs the 12 skills into that agent's own folder.

Or inside Claude Code

In the Plugins tab, add this marketplace:

skillmds/skillmd
/plugin install brycewang-stanford-british-journal-of-political-science-skills@skillmd

Adds the marketplace once; later plugins need the second line only.

Or install by hand

Download the plugin and unzip its skills/ folder into your agent's skills directory. Works with every agent, no CLI needed.

Download plugin Paths per agent

Just the markdown? SKILL.md files only.

This plugin

skills: 12
authors: 1

Published by a registry member. Review its skills before installing.

Skills in this plugin

▌
Bjps Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the response to a British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) revise-and-resubmit. The response must convert each of the (usually two-plus) double-blind referees while keeping the editor confident the revision is convergent. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.

1k repo stars
▌
Bjps Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use as the entry point for any British Journal of Political Science (BJPS / BJPolS) manuscript. Routes to the right BJPS sub-skill based on lifecycle stage and which of the three formats (Research Article, Letter, Comment) fits. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Bjps Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) — format selection, double-blind anonymization, word/abstract caps, Cambridge (Harvard author-date) house style, ORCID, and declarations. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Bjps Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for a British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) manuscript so it survives expert, double-blind review — honest uncertainty, robustness, and triangulation appropriate to quantitative, experimental, or computational work. Guides analysis norms; it does not fabricate results.

1k repo stars
▌
Bjps Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or polishing a British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) manuscript so it reads for a broad, international political-science audience, follows Cambridge's house (Harvard author-date) style, and fits the word caps (Research Articles ~10,000 words; Letters ~4,000; abstract <= 150 words). Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.

1k repo stars
▌
Bjps Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use to understand how the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review with at least two referees, the desk screen, decision categories, and what reviewers are asked to weigh. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

1k repo stars
▌
Bjps Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building tables and figures for a British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) manuscript so exhibits are self-contained, accessible, fit Cambridge's size limits, and earn their place under the word budget. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Bjps Research Design · brycewang-stanford
Use when defending the research design of a British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) manuscript — causal identification for quantitative work, case selection and process tracing for qualitative work, experimental and survey-experimental design, or formal-empirical linkage. BJPS judges each tradition on its own terms. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.

1k repo stars
▌
Bjps Theory Building · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the theoretical argument of a British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) manuscript into a contribution of general interest — whether the work is formal/game-theoretic, empirical with explicit mechanisms, interpretive, or normative. BJPS rewards a clear, portable argument over a bare finding. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.

1k repo stars
▌
Bjps Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a political-science project fits the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) and which of its three formats to target. BJPS is a broad, internationally-oriented general journal, so the test is wide interest across subfields and beyond one national case, not subfield novelty alone. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.

1k repo stars
▌
Bjps Transparency And Data · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing the replication / transparency materials for a British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) manuscript. BJPS is a DA-RT signatory and requires authors to deposit replication data and code in the BJPolS Dataverse (Harvard Dataverse) at acceptance, with restricted-access exemptions. Covers quantitative and qualitative transparency. Prepares the package; it does not waive requirements.

1k repo stars
▌
Bjps Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when positioning a British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) manuscript against the literature so it reads as a contribution of wide, cross-subfield, international interest. BJPS readers span subfields and countries, so the paper must engage the literatures they expect and avoid the desk-screen trap of looking parochial. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the lit review.

1k repo stars