CSCW Skills
A 12-skill depth pack for CSCW submissions: venue fit and CHI/ICWSM routing, the PACMHCI journal model with Revise-and-Resubmit rounds, PCS and Manuscript Central submission, qualitative and quantitative methods rigor, sensitive community-data ethics, response letters, and PACMHCI camera-ready production. Grounded in cscw.acm.org CFP pages, the rolling-model announcement, ACM DL PACMHCI issues, an
Skills in this plugin
11- ▌ Cscw Submission · brycewang-stanfordUse when readying a CSCW manuscript for upload — confirming the current pathway (rolling via Manuscript Central as of mid-2026), the single-column ACM template, the word-length scrutiny band, anonymization of author and community identifiers, ethics statements, and desk-risk triage.
- ▌ Cscw Experiments · brycewang-stanfordUse when designing or auditing the empirical work behind a CSCW paper — interview and ethnographic rigor, trace and log analysis, surveys, deployments, and mixed methods — matching each method's own validity standard and the ethics of studying real communities.
- ▌ Cscw Camera Ready · brycewang-stanfordUse when a CSCW paper is accepted and enters PACMHCI production — executing minor-change conditions, deanonymizing text and artifacts, ACM journal e-rights and TAPS steps, issue assignment, and the separate track of presenting at the next CSCW conference.
- ▌ Cscw Related Work · brycewang-stanfordUse when positioning a CSCW paper's related work — engaging the venue's own concept lineage, the PACMHCI-era literature, neighboring HCI venues, and the social sciences CSCW borrows from, with era-correct citations and anonymity-safe self-references for journal-model review.
- ▌ Cscw Supplementary · brycewang-stanfordUse when assembling supplementary materials for a CSCW submission — appendices, codebooks, interview guides, survey instruments, analysis code, and data extracts — deciding what accompanies a journal-model paper, anonymized end to end and consistent across R&R rounds.
- ▌ Cscw Writing Style · brycewang-stanfordUse when drafting or revising CSCW prose — group-level framing, concepts a field can reuse, participant voice handled with care, theory that earns its keep, and length discipline under the 5,000-12,000-word scrutiny band where contribution is weighed against every page.
- ▌ Cscw Review Process · brycewang-stanfordUse when interpreting where a CSCW paper stands in review — the PACMHCI journal model's decision vocabulary (Revise for External Review, Revise and Resubmit, Conditional Accept), same-reviewer re-review, the rolling editorial board, and what each outcome statistically implied in the last cycle.
- ▌ Cscw Author Response · brycewang-stanfordUse when a CSCW paper draws Revise and Resubmit or Revise for External Review — triaging reviewer requests, running the weeks-long revision as a project, and writing the point-by-point response letter that the same reviewers will read before they reread anything else.
- ▌ Cscw Reproducibility · brycewang-stanfordUse when strengthening the transparency of a CSCW paper — auditable qualitative analysis trails, documented trace pipelines, codebooks and instruments, and honest data-availability statements when community and participant data cannot ethically be shared.
- ▌ Cscw Topic Selection · brycewang-stanfordUse when deciding whether a project belongs at CSCW — is the group, community, or organization the real unit of analysis? — and running the routing decision against CHI, ICWSM, DIS, GROUP, TOCHI, and social-science journals before any drafting or platform account setup begins.
- ▌ Cscw Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanfordUse when packaging what stands behind a CSCW paper — systems, analysis pipelines, codebooks, instruments, datasets from real communities — for review-time scrutiny and post-acceptance release, where community-data ethics constrain release more than any badge checklist.