Lancet Skills
Agent skill stack for submitting to The Lancet — the flagship clinical-medicine and global-health journal. Encodes The Lancet's editorial bar (clinically/public-health important, globally relevant, equity- and policy-oriented), prospective trial registration and protocol/SAP discipline, EQUATOR reporting guidelines (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA) with the mandatory study-flow diagram, the signature Resear
Skills in this plugin
11- ▌ Lancet Ethics · brycewang-stanfordUse to satisfy The Lancet's clinical-ethics and research-integrity requirements — ethics-committee approval and informed consent under the Declaration of Helsinki, the Declaration of interests, ICMJE author contributions, the role-of-the-funding-source statement, the data-sharing statement, patient and public involvement, and SAGER sex/gender plus equity reporting.
- ▌ Lancet Writing · brycewang-stanfordUse to structure and hold the length of a Lancet Article main text — Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion (~3000–3500 words), the Research in context panel, a limited reference list (~30), and a cautious, globally minded Discussion that does not overstate.
- ▌ Lancet Abstract · brycewang-stanfordUse to write The Lancet's structured abstract — ≤300 words under the exact headings Background, Methods, Findings, Interpretation, Funding — leading with the clinical question, reporting the primary outcome with effect size and 95% CI, citing the registration number, and naming the funder.
- ▌ Lancet Rebuttal · brycewang-stanfordUse after Lancet reviews arrive (including the statistical reviewer and the editor's letter) to triage the decision, answer statistical and clinical comments, and draft a point-by-point response that quotes the reviewer, gives evidence, quotes the revised manuscript text, and keeps causal language cautious. Do not run before the main text is actually revised.
- ▌ Lancet Workflow · brycewang-stanfordUse when deciding which lancet-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a clinical or global-health manuscript from significance test through reviewer rebuttal for The Lancet. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
- ▌ Lancet Reporting · brycewang-stanfordUse to select and apply the correct EQUATOR reporting guideline for a Lancet manuscript — CONSORT for RCTs (with the mandatory flow diagram), STROBE for observational studies, PRISMA for systematic reviews/meta-analyses, SPIRIT for protocols — and to attach the completed checklist and study-flow diagram.
- ▌ Lancet Statistics · brycewang-stanfordUse to enforce The Lancet's clinical-statistics reporting — confidence intervals over bare P values, a pre-specified primary analysis, intention-to-treat with per-protocol sensitivity, multiplicity control for secondary endpoints, cautious pre-specified subgroup analyses with interaction tests, missing-data handling, and absolute plus relative effects.
- ▌ Lancet Submission · brycewang-stanford bundleUse as the final preflight before submitting to The Lancet — a complete checklist across importance, registration, reporting guideline + flow diagram, statistics, structured abstract, the Research in context panel, ethics/declarations/data-sharing, and required files. Bundles a checklist and a cover-letter template.
- ▌ Lancet Study Design · brycewang-stanfordUse to lock study design and mandatory prospective registration for a Lancet clinical manuscript — trial registration before enrollment, protocol + statistical analysis plan, and design rigor (randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, pre-specified endpoints, power, ITT). Covers observational design choices too.
- ▌ Lancet Figures Tables · brycewang-stanfordUse to build and check The Lancet's clinical display items — the Table 1 baseline characteristics, Kaplan–Meier curves with numbers at risk, forest plots for subgroups/meta-analyses, the CONSORT/study-flow diagram, and maps for multi-country studies — all with confidence intervals shown.
- ▌ Lancet Research In Context · brycewang-stanfordUse to build The Lancet's signature Research in context panel — the three mandatory headed parts (Evidence before this study, Added value of this study, Implications of all the available evidence), grounded in a systematic literature search with stated databases, terms, and dates. Mandatory for original research Articles.