Review Of Finance Skills

Agent skill stack for manuscripts targeted at the Review of Finance (RoF) — the official journal of the European Finance Association (EFA), published by Oxford University Press, covering general-interest empirical and theoretical finance at the level of the top-three finance journals. Submission is via Editorial Express under double-blind review with a real, tiered submission fee (reduced for EFA

by @brycewang-stanford 11 skills

Install

npx skillmds@latest add plugin:brycewang-stanford/review-of-finance-skills

One command, no setup. In Claude Code it lands as a managed plugin you can enable, disable or remove with /plugin. On any other agent it installs the 11 skills into that agent's own folder.

Or inside Claude Code

In the Plugins tab, add this marketplace:

skillmds/skillmd
/plugin install brycewang-stanford-review-of-finance-skills@skillmd

Adds the marketplace once; later plugins need the second line only.

Or install by hand

Download the plugin and unzip its skills/ folder into your agent's skills directory. Works with every agent, no CLI needed.

Download plugin Paths per agent

Just the markdown? SKILL.md files only.

This plugin

skills: 11
authors: 1

Published by a registry member. Review its skills before installing.

Skills in this plugin

▌
Rof Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting a Review of Finance response letter and revision plan after an R&R, especially under the two-round philosophy, top-three-finance standards, code/data conditions, and page-cap constraints.

1k repo stars
▌
Rof Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which rof-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Review of Finance (RoF) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Rof Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running a Review of Finance submission preflight for Editorial Express, regular versus Fast-Track fee choice, 60-page cap, 150-word abstract, double-blind anonymity, Chicago references, cover-letter disclosure, and code-sharing exceptions.

1k repo stars
▌
Rof Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when revising a Review of Finance manuscript for a 150-word abstract, double-blind wording, Chicago-style references, first-order finance framing, two-round review discipline, and 60-page total manuscript constraint.

1k repo stars
▌
Rof Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when interpreting Review of Finance desk screening, Screen Reports, double-blind review, top-three-finance-journal referee standards, two-round decision philosophy, Fast-Track timing, and sanctions for undisclosed resubmission or dual submission.

1k repo stars
▌
Rof Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing Review of Finance tables and figures under the 60-page total cap, including empirical-finance exhibits, theory figures, robustness tables, data-description tables, and replication-friendly notes.

1k repo stars
▌
Rof Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when judging whether a finance idea clears the Review of Finance (RoF) general-interest bar before any estimation or modeling — first-order question, fit with the journal's empirical-and-theoretical scope, and the top-three-finance-journal standard RoF referees apply.

1k repo stars
▌
Rof Contribution Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use when the marginal contribution of a Review of Finance (RoF) manuscript to the finance literature is fuzzy or undersold — turning a result into a defensible "what we now know that we did not" claim that a top-three-standard referee will accept.

1k repo stars
▌
Rof Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when positioning a Review of Finance (RoF) manuscript against the finance frontier — citing the right top-three work, honoring RoF's strict author-responsibility citation norm, and staking the contribution without a standalone survey.

1k repo stars
▌
Rof Identification Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when the credibility core of a Review of Finance (RoF) manuscript is the bottleneck — causal identification for empirical finance (DID, IV, RDD, event study, natural experiments) OR assumptions, results, and proof exposition for theoretical finance. Stress-tests the design or model to the top-three-finance-journal standard.

1k repo stars
▌
Rof Replication And Data Policy · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing the Review of Finance (RoF) replication package — code, data, pseudo-datasets for proprietary sources such as Datastream or Bankscope, log files, the Data Availability Statement, dataset citations, cover-letter exception requests at initial submission, and OUP supplementary hosting, since the journal's code-sharing policy can hold publication until programs are received.

1k repo stars