WACV Skills

A 12-skill depth pack for WACV submissions: applications-vs-algorithms track choice, the two-round Revise-and-Resubmit review model, OpenReview submission checks, Round 1 rebuttals, reproducibility and artifacts, supplementary material, IEEE Xplore and CVF open-access camera-ready, writing style, related work, experiments, and campaign workflow. Grounded in the official WACV 2027 Call for Papers,

by @brycewang-stanford 11 skills

Skills in this plugin

11
  1. Wacv Submission · brycewang-stanford
    Use when auditing a WACV submission before an OpenReview round deadline, covering the Round 1 vs Round 2 choice, the Applications vs Algorithms track field, the 8-page-including-figures limit, double-blind anonymity and OpenReview-profile requirements, the anonymized supplement, dual submission, and desk-reject triage.
    1k repo stars
  2. Wacv Experiments · brycewang-stanford
    Use when designing or auditing WACV experiments, covering Applications-track systems evidence (latency, power, robustness under real constraints) versus Algorithms-track matched-baseline novelty, comparative assessment under the deployed condition, uncertainty over seeds and sessions, ablations, and evidence that survives the two-round review.
    1k repo stars
  3. Wacv Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford
    Use when preparing a WACV camera-ready after acceptance, covering de-anonymization, IEEE Xplore plus CVF open-access dual publication, IEEE copyright and PDF checks, the dataset and code release obligation, per-paper registration, and preparing the winter-conference talk or poster once a paper clears Round 1 or Round 2.
    1k repo stars
  4. Wacv Related Work · brycewang-stanford
    Use when writing or auditing a WACV related-work section, covering how to position an applications or algorithms contribution against fast-moving vision literature, sibling-venue (CVPR/ICCV/ECCV) and arXiv concurrency, application-domain literature, double-blind self-citation, and verifying that cited "WACV papers" are actually WACV papers.
    1k repo stars
  5. Wacv Supplementary · brycewang-stanford
    Use when organizing WACV supplementary material, covering what belongs in the anonymized supplement versus the 8-page body, packaging qualitative videos and extra results without breaking double-blind, keeping the supplement consistent with the paper across the two-round revision, and honoring WACV's no-author-identifying-links rule.
    1k repo stars
  6. Wacv Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
    Use when revising a WACV paper's prose and first page, covering how to write for the chosen Applications or Algorithms track, leading with the real-world constraint or the method, self-contained figure captions inside the 8-page-including-figures budget, scoped claims, and a first page that pre-empts the Revise-and-Resubmit question.
    1k repo stars
  7. Wacv Review Process · brycewang-stanford
    Use when reasoning about how WACV decides a paper, covering the two-round model, the Round 1 Accept / Revise-and-Resubmit / Reject recommendations, the optional Round 1 rebuttal, the no-rebuttal Round 2, area-chair consolidation, double-blind confidentiality, and where author leverage actually exists across the two rounds.
    1k repo stars
  8. Wacv Author Response · brycewang-stanford
    Use when responding to WACV reviews, covering the optional one-page Round 1 rebuttal and, separately, the Revise-and-Resubmit change summary that carries a revised paper into the no-rebuttal Round 2, including how to triage three reviews for the area chair, what a rebuttal can and cannot claim, and keeping every response double-blind.
    1k repo stars
  9. Wacv Reproducibility · brycewang-stanford
    Use when strengthening the reproducibility of a WACV paper, covering the recipe ledger for constraint-aware systems, benchmark and split hygiene, seed and session honesty, device and power reporting for applications claims, and keeping the reproduction package in sync with the paper across the two-round Revise-and-Resubmit lap.
    1k repo stars
  10. Wacv Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
    Use when deciding whether a project belongs at WACV or should route elsewhere, covering WACV's applications-first identity within the CVF's CVPR/ICCV/ECCV/WACV calendar, the Applications-vs-Algorithms track choice, whether the two-round winter timing fits your schedule, and routing to CVPR, ICCV, ECCV, 3DV, or a journal.
    1k repo stars
  11. Wacv Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford
    Use when packaging code, data, and models for a WACV paper, covering the anonymous review artifact versus the public post-acceptance release, reproducing constraint-based applications claims (latency, power, robustness) not just accuracy, dataset licensing and release, and keeping the artifact in sync across the two-round Revise-and-Resubmit lap.
    1k repo stars