Cnfjlhj@AI Collab Playbook

Use when a task is ambiguous and needs deep multi-role planning with designer, inspiration, and reviewer perspectives before execution. Skip this for ordinary task plans.

Use when turning an academic paper PDF/arXiv/OpenReview page/local LaTeX source into a single-file Chinese HTML deep-reading page, especially when the user wants a Cheat-Sheet style explanation, KaTeX formulas, figure/table evidence, validation, or a publishable research page.

Use when the user explicitly wants to upload a final or near-final PDF to paperreview.ai for an external second opinion. Skip this for local paper critique, which should go through `paper-review-pipeline` first.

Use when receiving messy, unstructured input like voice transcriptions, stream-of-consciousness notes, or rough document content that needs to be transformed into a polished, optimized prompt. Cleans up filler words, extracts intent, asks clarifying questions, applies Claude 4.x/Opus 4.5/Sonnet 4.5 best practices, and previews the polished prompt for approval before execution. Trigger phrases include "polish this", "clean this up", "turn this into a prompt", or when input is clearly rough/unstructured.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "remove AI writing patterns", "humanize this text", "make this sound more natural", "remove AI-generated traces", "fix robotic writing", or needs to eliminate AI writing patterns from prose. Supports both English and Chinese text. Based on Wikipedia's "Signs of AI writing" guide, detects and fixes inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, AI vocabulary, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases.

Use when a research question is still vague and must be clarified into a structured deep-research brief before actual literature research or execution. Skip this if the user already has a concrete paper draft or a ready-to-run research specification.

小红书笔记素材创作技能。当用户需要创建小红书笔记素材时使用这个技能。技能包含：根据用户的需求和提供的资料，撰写小红书笔记内容（标题+正文），生成图片卡片（封面+正文卡片），以及发布小红书笔记。

Use when auditing a large local skill collection, identifying duplicate or imported skills, comparing skill roots, or deciding what to keep, disable, or archive across Codex and adjacent agent skill directories.

落实 CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md 中的“主动探索”原则，在向用户提问前自动使用 Grep、Read、Bash、WebSearch 等工具获取信息

学术论文写作助手，专门用于 LaTeX 论文编写、BibTeX 管理、格式化、学术写作规范检查。适用于 AI/ML 研究论文、会议投稿（NeurIPS、ICML、ICLR 等）

Use when a mostly complete ML conference paper needs self-review, pre-submission QA, camera-ready checking, section-by-section critique, citation-risk inspection, or rebuttal/review-response drafting. Skip this for initial drafting and use `paperreview` only when the user explicitly wants external submission.

Use when the user wants multi-agent division of labor for research-led work and the lead should stay on the critical path while 1-2 bounded sidecars handle low-coupling tasks. Do not use this for tiny tasks, fully sequential debugging, or overlapping refactors.

Use when the user asks to review a skill, analyze skill quality, update a skill version, or run a repeatable keep/disable/archive decision loop from real failures instead of abstract best practices.

Use when recovering a Codex session, especially if the user provides a Codex session id or wants recent Codex sessions listed before resuming work.

Use when you explicitly want a second local or SSH remote Codex CLI session to prototype, debug, or review code, while your current session remains the primary owner of the final result.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "人机风暴", "Human-Machine Brainstorm", "human storm", "ccb brainstorm", "需求对齐调度", "spec convergence", or wants a CCB-based multi-model requirement alignment loop with Codex as the dispatcher.

Use when you want Claude Code CLI as a second opinion for coding tasks such as design tradeoffs, debugging, or diff review, while keeping Codex as the primary implementer.

Use when you want Gemini CLI as a second opinion for coding tasks such as prototyping, debugging, or diff review, while keeping Codex as the primary implementer.

Generate a detailed, professional video content summary from timestamped subtitles/transcripts (e.g., lines starting with 00:00 / 1:23:45). Enforce strict per-segment structure (timestamp range + bold segment title + 2-paragraph body: first-person creator summary + expert 【导师评注】 critique with uncertainty handling). Use when the user provides time-coded subtitles and asks for a规范化纪要/内容纪要/逐段总结, and optionally wants a clean PDF export (do NOT include the full raw transcript in the PDF unless explicitly requested).

This skill should be used when the user wants to publish an existing Markdown article to Xiaohongshu as a private longform post, keep the original wording and structure, insert inline images in order, use one-click layout, and verify the result in note manager.