Review Hog

Review Hog from gabrielmoreira/agent-skills-mirror.

Install

npx skillmds@latest add plugin:gabrielmoreira/review-hog

One command, no setup. In Claude Code it lands as a managed plugin you can enable, disable or remove with /plugin. On any other agent it installs the 7 skills into that agent's own folder.

Or inside Claude Code

In the Plugins tab, add this marketplace:

skillmds/skillmd
/plugin install gabrielmoreira-review-hog@skillmd

Adds the marketplace once; later plugins need the second line only.

Or install by hand

Download the plugin and unzip its skills/ folder into your agent's skills directory. Works with every agent, no CLI needed.

Download plugin Paths per agent

Just the markdown? SKILL.md files only.

This plugin

skills: 7
authors: 1

Published by a registry member. Review its skills before installing.

Skills in this plugin

▌
Review Hog Authoring · gabrielmoreira
How to author custom PostHog Review skills: the review perspectives, blind-spot checks, validation criteria, and resolution criteria that drive PostHog Review's automated PR reviews. Use when a user wants a new review perspective (a specialist lens on their PRs), a custom blind-spot sweep, their own validation bar for which findings get published, or their own bar for which review comments get implemented. Trigger on "create a PostHog Review perspective", "custom review perspective", "my own blind-spot check", "custom validation criteria", "custom resolution criteria", "tune what PostHog Review publishes", "tune what PostHog Review implements".

17 repo stars
▌
Review Hog Blind Spots General · gabrielmoreira
The general blind-spot check for PostHog Review, the final sweep that runs after every enabled review perspective has reviewed a chunk. Hunts for real, high-value issues that ALL of the perspectives missed, conditioned on what they actually found; returns an empty list over padding.

17 repo stars
▌
Review Hog Resolution Criteria · gabrielmoreira
The resolution criteria for PostHog Review's resolution stage: the bar for deciding, per unresolved review thread, whether the ask is worth implementing and safe to implement unattended. Implements contained, provable fixes; declines noise with a reason; escalates real-but-risky asks to a human.

17 repo stars
▌
Review Hog Validation Criteria · gabrielmoreira
The validation criteria for PostHog Review, the bar for deciding whether a flagged PR issue is worth keeping. Keeps real, user-affecting correctness / security / data-loss / contract / performance problems; drops overengineering, speculation, paranoia, never-gonna-happen edge cases, and style.

17 repo stars
▌
Review Hog Perspective Logic Correctness · gabrielmoreira
The Logic & Correctness review perspective for PostHog Review. Verifies that changed code does what it is supposed to do: business logic, edge cases, data transformations, and query / data-access correctness. Reports correctness issues only; security and performance are separate perspectives.

17 repo stars
▌
Review Hog Perspective Contracts Security · gabrielmoreira
The Contracts & Security review perspective for PostHog Review. Verifies that changed code is safe and maintains compatibility: API contracts and breaking changes, injection / authz / data exposure, input validation, and schema / interface alignment. Reports security and contract issues only.

17 repo stars
▌
Review Hog Perspective Performance Reliability · gabrielmoreira
The Performance & Reliability review perspective for PostHog Review. Verifies that changed code will perform and hold up in production: resource efficiency, error handling and recovery, scalability, and operational readiness. Reports performance and reliability issues only.

17 repo stars