Results for “paper-audit”

Verifies every bibliographic entry in a paper for existence, metadata accuracy, and contextual support using web/DBLP/arXiv lookups, flagging hallucinated authors, wrong years, fabricated venues, and misattributed citations.

Audits a paper draft by tracing every numeric claim and assertion back to result files on disk, flagging untraced, mismatched, stale, uncited, and phantom references.

Iteratively improves a compiled LaTeX paper through two rounds of external LLM review, fix implementation, and recompilation.

Simulates a NeurIPS/SC/ICSE-style peer review with five reviewer personas (HPC, ML, Stats, Reproducibility, Devil's Advocate) that verify every claim against actual result data before submission.

Routes quality reviews to specialized critic agents based on file type or flags, covering peer review, code review, and manuscript polish.