Results for “code-review”

Finds the open GitHub PR for the current branch and helps address review comments using the gh CLI.

Agent profile for evaluate and implement no-code/low-code workflows, forms, automations, Airtable/Sheets/Zapier-like patterns. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Finds the open GitHub PR for the current branch and helps address review comments using the gh CLI.

Expert in secure backend coding practices specializing in input validation, authentication, and API security. Use PROACTIVELY for backend security implementations or security code reviews.

Delegate coding tasks to Claude Code (Anthropic's CLI agent). Use for building features, refactoring, PR reviews, and iterative coding. Requires the claude CLI installed.

Protocol-level two-agent paper writing workflow. Use when the user wants Codex to plan and review from global context while DeepSeek writes or revises the manuscript through the global deepseek-agent skill, with muxing-style-review used for explicit prose style checks.

Provides Codex CLI delegation workflows for complex code generation and development tasks using OpenAI's GPT-5.3-codex models, including English prompt formulation, execution flags, sandbox modes, and safe result handling. Use when the user explicitly asks to use Codex for complex programming tasks such as code generation, refactoring, or architectural analysis. Triggers on "use codex", "delegate to codex", "run codex cli", "ask codex", "codex exec", "codex review".

Run a standard Claude Code review of local git changes in this repository. Args: --wait, --background, --base <ref>, --scope <auto|working-tree|branch>, --model <model>, --effort <low|medium|high|xhigh|max>. Defaults to opus + xhigh effort. Use as the default path for ordinary code-review requests when the user did not explicitly ask for stronger adversarial scrutiny or for Claude to own the implementation work.

Orchestrates parallel AI agent sessions using dmux, a tmux pane manager, with patterns for research, implementation, testing, and code review across multiple harnesses.

Expert in secure mobile coding practices specializing in input validation, WebView security, and mobile-specific security patterns. Use PROACTIVELY for mobile security implementations or mobile security code reviews.

Orchestrates building a new feature end-to-end by delegating research, planning, TDD implementation, review, and gated commit to specialized agents.

Master software architect specializing in modern architecture patterns, clean architecture, microservices, event-driven systems, and DDD. Reviews system designs and code changes for architectural integrity, scalability, and maintainability. Use PROACTIVELY for architectural decisions.

Agent profile for review API platform contracts, versioning, auth, rate limits, SDK clients, and developer experience. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Agent profile for review pricing, invoices, subscriptions, entitlements, revenue logic, tax-sensitive flows, and billing UX. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Agent profile for review prompt injection, tool boundaries, untrusted content, data exfiltration, and human approval gates. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Static OWASP review of app code (injection, headers, deps). Use when "review security" or "check vulnerabilities". Session/route×gate/getSession → audit-auth-flows. Plan-only burndown → plan-security-audit. Table RLS → plan-rls-audit. LLM attacks → audit-llm-security.

21-rule prose review workflow for technical and academic Markdown/LaTeX excerpts. Use when the user asks for muxing-style-review, wants a complete agent-style check combining check-human.md with agent-style audit-only evidence, wants a compact-rule check, wants a DeepSeek/Codex manuscript draft checked for clarity, evidence, citation discipline, terminology, AI-tell prose, or wants an A/B draft comparison. Prefer a dedicated review subagent when available for non-trivial reviews. Use the sibling style-review skill for the upstream post-hoc audit/polish workflow.

Use BEFORE generating, refactoring, reviewing, or debugging code. Trigger phrases include "write a function/script/class for X", "review this code/diff/PR", "refactor this", "debug this error", "is this implementation correct", "what's wrong with this code", "improve this code", "translate from X to Y", or any prompt with a code block the user wants you to act on. Also fires when planning architectural changes, picking algorithms or data structures, or evaluating dependency upgrades. Calls the code MCP tool to retrieve an engineering scaffold (failure pattern, procedure, correct-pattern example, verification step) before generating. Catches hallucinated APIs, lost edge cases, premature algorithm commitment, silent contract violations, refactors that change behavior masked by passing tests. Do NOT trigger for pure code reading with no action requested, simple syntax questions, file...

Iteratively improve a Claude Code skill using the skill-reviewer agent until it meets quality standards. Use when improving a skill with multiple quality issues, iterating on a new skill until it meets standards, or automated fix-review cycles instead of manual editing.

Use ONLY for code review and test write/review guidance in `packages/agent-core-v2` (the DI × Scope agent engine). Does NOT apply to the legacy `packages/agent-core` or to any other package — for those, do not load this skill. Groups the review and testing lenses used for agent-core-v2 — `slop` (single-level-of-abstraction / layered error-handling review, invoked only on explicit request) and `test` (contract-driven per-test rules for both authoring and reviewing tests). Apply the sub-skill that matches the task; do not apply `slop` unprompted.

Orchestrate a fleet of parallel `codex exec` workers with you (Claude Code) as the supervisor — spawn one per isolated git worktree, dispatch headless, verify each INDEPENDENTLY, PR/merge. The manual "codex-ultracode" pattern for fanning out real implementation, research, or review work onto Codex. Bakes in the hard gotchas (stdin blocking, background tracking, don't-trust-self-reports, writer isolation). Triggers on — orchestrate codex, codex workers, codex fleet, spawn codex, delegate to codex in parallel, manual ultracode, 开 codex 小弟, 派 codex worker — NOT for a single cross-vendor opinion (use the `second-opinion-codex` agent), NOT for web-UI worker decomposition (use `/orchestrate`).

Create, review, and debug GitHub Copilot reusable prompt files and slash commands in Visual Studio Code.

Watch, audit, and fix another agent's work by reconstructing the original request, inspecting evidence, and reporting gaps.

Enhances plain-language requests into structured, reviewable prompts and inspects a self-hosted MCP gateway with provider-free defaults.

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.

Call a DeepSeek-backed OpenCode agent as a separate critique, writing, or revision agent from Codex. Use when Codex needs to delegate adversarial research critique, novelty skepticism, method review, manuscript prose, LaTeX section drafting, academic text revision, or paper-writing feedback loops to DeepSeek.

Use for designing, creating, reviewing, or packaging GitHub Copilot and Agent Plugins for Visual Studio Code, including plugin.json, portable skills, MCP components, client-specific agents, commands, and hooks. Do not use for a single standalone skill, ordinary VS Code extensions, or installing an unreviewed plugin.

Delegate coding tasks to Codex, Claude Code, or Pi agents via background process. Use when: (1) building/creating new features or apps, (2) reviewing PRs (spawn in temp dir), (3) refactoring large codebases, (4) iterative coding that needs file exploration. NOT for: simple one-liner fixes (just edit), reading code (use read tool), thread-bound ACP harness requests in chat (for example spawn/run Codex or Claude Code in a Discord thread; use sessions_spawn with runtime:"acp"), or any work in ~/clawd workspace (never spawn agents here). Claude Code: use --print --permission-mode bypassPermissions (no PTY). Codex/Pi/OpenCode: pty:true required.

Delegates tasks to specialized AI agents running in parallel via the Box0 platform, enabling code review, security checks, research, and documentation.

Audits test files for anti-patterns and quality issues, producing a severity-ranked report across multiple languages and frameworks.

Write, review, refactor, and optimize Slang shader code for graphics, compute, tessellation, and ray tracing pipelines with cross-compilation support.

Audit datasets for structure, missingness, labeling, suspicious values, duplicate identifiers, and documentation readiness. Use when a researcher asks for data QA, codebook review, sanity checks, or pre-analysis cleanup guidance.

Write, review, and migrate code using NVIDIA DALI's imperative dynamic-mode API for efficient data loading and preprocessing.

Rates an agent's own output on five axes — accuracy, completeness, clarity, actionability, conciseness — producing a structured scorecard with evidence and improvement suggestions.

Runs a budget-aware agent-assisted engineering health audit for instruction/config drift, hooks/MCP, verifier surfaces, and AI maintainability. Use when users ask in any language to audit Claude, Codex, Pi, agent instructions, MCP or hooks, verifier coverage, or AI-maintainability drift. Not for debugging application code or reviewing PRs.

Grades individual test methods and produces a compact markdown table with a letter grade, score band, and one-line note for each test.