Results for “go-no-go”

When tackling a task that requires domain expertise beyond general coding ability — architecture patterns, framework-specific gotchas, deployment strategies, security anti-patterns, or specialized workflows — call the windags_skill_graft MCP tool with your task description. You'll receive expert knowledge including decision trees, failure modes, worked examples, and anti-patterns from a library of 503+ curated skills. Only graft when the task genuinely requires specialized knowledge. Simple tasks (rename a variable, fix a typo, format code) do not need grafting.

Orchestrate a fleet of parallel `codex exec` workers with you (Claude Code) as the supervisor — spawn one per isolated git worktree, dispatch headless, verify each INDEPENDENTLY, PR/merge. The manual "codex-ultracode" pattern for fanning out real implementation, research, or review work onto Codex. Bakes in the hard gotchas (stdin blocking, background tracking, don't-trust-self-reports, writer isolation). Triggers on — orchestrate codex, codex workers, codex fleet, spawn codex, delegate to codex in parallel, manual ultracode, 开 codex 小弟, 派 codex worker — NOT for a single cross-vendor opinion (use the `second-opinion-codex` agent), NOT for web-UI worker decomposition (use `/orchestrate`).

Run a structured retrospective after development-phase runs of your product's agents — interview the owner in plain language about what went well and poorly, draft ranked improvement hypotheses, then design and run small n=1/n=2 experiments with pre-declared success criteria, guardrails, stop conditions, and a cost/ROI kill-switch. Load when the user says how did that run go, retro this run, the agent output was bad, what should we improve, draft hypotheses, run a small experiment, or after repeated dev runs of an agentic system produce uneven quality. Priority: output quality over performance over cost, each with diminishing-returns stops. NOT a product A/B test (experimentation), NOT coding-agent harness repair (harness-evolution), NOT production-scale learning (runtime-learning-loop).

Orchestrator for agent harness work — the setup that makes AI agents follow project rules and improve when they fail. FIRES PROACTIVELY when agents misbehave, repeat mistakes, ignore instructions, skip skills, or when AGENTS.md exists but docs/harness/manifest.json is missing. Also triggers on: harness engineering, agent scaffold, agent keeps failing, agent not following instructions, make agents reliable, agents going off rails, agent forgot context, improve agent setup, self-improving agents, agents keep making mistakes, why is my agent bad, agent quality, agent setup broken, agents ignore skills, same mistake again, fix agent behavior, tune agent instructions, set up agent infrastructure, after project setup agents still bad. Routes bootstrap vs evolution. Not multi-agent topology — agent-builder.

Sets up and audits the Claude Code harness for a project: CLAUDE.md, .claude/rules, skills, subagents, settings.json permissions, hooks, verification loop. Commands: kickoff (scaffold new setup), check-playbook (score an existing one), scouting-report (last scorecard), adjust (fix bloat/misplaced instructions), drill (turn advisory prose into real hooks/permissions/CI), decline (record an accepted risk), gameplan (work order with acceptance criteria before building), watch-film (check a diff against that order for scope creep/weakened tests/false claims). Use for setting up Claude Code, or on: "Claude ignores my CLAUDE.md", "it's huge and still misses things", "it said done but ran nothing", "it changed files I didn't ask about", "it weakened a test to pass", "rule, skill, or hook?", "is my setup any good". Not for code quality (code-audit), test coverage (test-assessment), one-off prompt wording (genie-proof-prompts), new skill authoring (skill-creator), or compacting a conversation (handoff).

Capture actionable learnings that emerge during conversation — when the agent or user discovers that a skill, a set of skills, or a process needs to be updated based on what's happening in the current chat. Sub-skill of the learn-from orchestrator. Load when the user says "we should update the skill for this", "this should be a skill rule", "add this as a gotcha", "the skill should know about this", "update the process for this", "remember this for next time", "this is important for the skill". Also triggers when the agent notices a skill's guidance was wrong or incomplete, a process step failed or was unnecessary, a new pattern emerged, a guardrail was missing, a workaround became a pattern, or a debugging session reveals a gap.

Plan which model tier handles which work BEFORE execution begins — a high-cognition model deeply understands the problem, lays the foundations, then emits a modular plan assigning each module the cheapest tier that can safely execute it, with escalation tripwires and one-way-door protection. Advisory only: it announces "next module → tier X / model Y" at each boundary and the HUMAN switches models — harnesses like Cursor cannot switch mid-run. Load when the user asks which model to use, wants a model plan, model tiers, model-tier routing, assign models to tasks or modules, says "cheap model got stuck", "which model for this task", "cost-efficient model choice", or when implementation-plan / problem-to-plan need a model: tier column. NOT dynamic-routing (plan-path selection after failure) — this skill assigns cognition tiers to work.