Results for “code-review”

Reference guide for evaluating LLM-generated translations between CUDA and OpenMP, covering memory model mapping, kernel launch patterns, shared memory, atomics, and common failure modes.

Agent profile for analyze target users, workflows, usability risks, research questions, and evidence gaps. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Agent profile for design motion systems, transitions, easing, reduced-motion behavior, and performance-safe animation. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Agent profile for lead framework, dependency, database, SDK, and architecture migrations with sequencing and rollback. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Agent profile for evaluate RAG quality, chunking, retrieval, citations, hallucination risks, freshness, and regression sets. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Agent profile for plan PPC account structure, creative testing, budget hypotheses, measurement, and landing-page alignment. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Agent profile for design test strategy across unit, integration, contract, E2E, visual, performance, and regression layers. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Agent profile for write developer docs, user docs, API docs, tutorials, changelogs, and concise implementation notes. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.

Audits natural-language programming artifacts such as SKILL.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, slash commands, plugin manifests, hooks, rules, and prompt files. Use when reviewing AI-agent repositories, checking manifest-vs-disk consistency, scoring skill or agent quality, adding NL artifact CI gates, or diagnosing vocabulary and version drift across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and Antigravity-style projects.

Agent profile for design AI/ML features, retrieval, model calls, structured outputs, cost controls, evals, and fallbacks. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Agent profile for design and implement backend services, API logic, data access, jobs, auth boundaries, and error handling. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Audits AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md files for bloat, redundancy, and ineffective rules, then runs A/B evals to prove which instructions are dead weight.

Prevents AI-introduced regressions with sandbox-mode API testing, automated bug-check workflows, and patterns that catch blind spots where the same model writes and reviews code.

Authoritative guidance for building Claude Code skills, agents, and plugins, plus init and update steps that install and refresh the plugin-building skills in the current repository. Use when you need the rules or best practices for a skill, agent, hook, or plugin — designing, reviewing, hardening, or checking one against the guidance. Run with `init` to vendor the guidance, skill-builder, and agent-builder skills into the current repository (so they run with no dependency on this plugin) plus a path-scoped rule index, or `update` to refresh an already-vendored copy. Does not run an interview to build a new skill or agent from scratch — use skill-builder or agent-builder. Does not write feature code, review application code, or build non-plugin features.

Use for creating, splitting, reviewing, or debugging GitHub Copilot custom instructions in Visual Studio Code, including .github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/*.instructions.md, and AGENTS.md. Do not use for slash commands, Agent Skills, custom agents, hooks, or ordinary project documentation.

Route LangSmith work into one workflow packet before touching SDK code. Use when the user needs LangSmith tracing, offline evals, annotation/review queues, prompt-registry decisions, audit/gap review, or cross-service trace propagation for an LLM app or agent workflow. Choose one packet: trace-debug, eval, review, prompt-registry, propagation, or audit. Triggers on: LangSmith, LangChain tracing, `@traceable` / `traceable`, `wrap_openai` / `wrapOpenAI`, datasets, experiments, annotation queues, feedback criteria, Prompt Hub, run trees, trace IDs, or production confidence for an AI feature. Not for generic SLO/alert design, non-LangSmith deployment orchestration, or runtime guardrails outside LangSmith.

Use for creating, reviewing, debugging, or testing GitHub Copilot agent hooks in Visual Studio Code, including .github/hooks JSON, lifecycle events, Python handlers, permissions, and structured stdin/stdout. Do not use for advisory instructions, one-off commands, CI workflows, or shell profile hooks.

Applies Han's shared Human-Readable Output Standard to a target you already have — a file on disk, text pasted into the prompt, or a draft already produced in the conversation — by dispatching the readability-editor to rewrite its prose so the main point comes first, headings are descriptive, each paragraph carries one idea, and sentences stay short and active, while preserving every fact. Use when you want to make a document or draft readable, edit or polish prose for readability, clean up writing, tighten wording, or re-apply the readability standard to something already written. Rewrites prose only, leaving code, diagrams, and citation identifiers unchanged. Does not write new feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not restructure code or review it — use refactor to restructure code and code-review to audit it. Does not judge the underlying work or raise findings; it only rewrites the writing.

Discover, find, compare, audit, repair, adapt, craft, run, debrief, and prepare repeatable AI-agent loops for publication. Use when a user asks to analyze code or coding threads for recurring work, find a published loop, interview them to turn a goal into a bounded loop, review a loop...

Discover, find, compare, audit, repair, adapt, craft, run, debrief, and prepare repeatable AI-agent loops for publication. Use when a user asks to analyze code or coding threads for recurring work, find a published loop, interview them to turn a goal into a bounded loop, review a loop...

Discover, find, compare, audit, repair, adapt, craft, run, debrief, and prepare repeatable AI-agent loops for publication. Use when a user asks to analyze code or coding threads for recurring work, find a published loop, interview them to turn a goal into a bounded loop, review a loop...

Use for designing, creating, reviewing, or debugging Model Context Protocol server configuration for GitHub Copilot in Visual Studio Code, including .vscode/mcp.json, transports, inputs, trust, sandboxing, and tool scope. Do not use for implementing an MCP server, ordinary HTTP clients, or silently installing or starting external software.

Design and implement clear, modular, resilient software and create executor-grade implementation plans with explicit scope, drift checks, verification gates, tests, STOP conditions, dependencies, and delegated-work review. Use for development, refactoring, architecture, implementation planning, safe migrations, handoffs to another engineer or agent, or verifying delegated code changes.

Guides creation of high-quality Agent Skills with domain expertise, anti-pattern detection, and progressive disclosure best practices. Activate on keywords: create skill, review skill, skill quality, skill best practices, skill anti-patterns, improve skill, skill audit. NOT for general coding advice, slash commands, MCP development, or non-skill Claude Code features.

Use for writing, reviewing, debugging, testing, or analyzing Python SimPy discrete-event simulations. Trigger on Environment, Event, Process, timeout, Resource, PriorityResource, PreemptiveResource, Container, Store, queues, interrupts, simulation clocks, replications, or SimPy monitoring. Do not use for asyncio services, wall-clock schedulers, continuous ODE solvers, or Monte Carlo code without an event-process model.

Design, create, audit, and improve Claude Agent Skills with expert-level progressive disclosure. Use when building new skills, reviewing existing skills, debugging activation failures, encoding domain expertise, designing skills for subagent consumption, or understanding platform constraints and distribution surfaces. NOT for general Claude Code features, runtime debugging, non-skill coding, or MCP server implementation.

Invoke only when the user explicitly asks to review code through the "single level of abstraction / layered error handling" lens — a function does only its own layer's business logic while errors are handled above or below. The agent reports detections, raw-count measurements, and move directions. Apply only when the user explicitly requests this lens.

Delegate a substantial diagnosis, implementation, or follow-up task to Claude Code through the tracked-job runtime. Args: --background, --wait, --resume, --resume-last, --fresh, --write, --model <model>, --effort <low|medium|high|xhigh|max>, --prompt-file <path>, [task text]. Defaults to opus + xhigh effort. Use when Claude should investigate or change things, not when the user only wants review findings.

Discover, find, compare, audit, repair, adapt, craft, run, debrief, and prepare repeatable AI-agent loops for publication. Use when a user asks to analyze code or coding threads for recurring work, find a published loop, interview them to turn a goal into a bounded loop, review a loop...

Garbage collection for your Claude Code configuration. Periodically scans ~/.claude (skills, memory, hooks, permissions, MCP servers, caches) for redundant, stale, orphaned, or low-value items, then walks the user through a confirm-each-deletion cleanup. Use when the user says "clean up my config", "config GC", "too many skills", "audit my setup", "my .claude is bloated", or asks for a periodic config review.

Evaluates Claude Agent Skills on 10 quality axes with letter grades (A+ through F) and specific improvement recommendations. Use when auditing a skill, comparing skills, prioritizing improvements, or performing quality control on a skill library. Activate on "grade skill", "evaluate skill", "skill quality", "skill audit", "skill review", "rate skill". NOT for creating skills (use skill-architect), grading code quality, or evaluating non-skill documents.

Curate Claude Code's auto-memory into durable project knowledge. Analyze MEMORY.md for patterns, promote proven learnings to CLAUDE.md and .claude/rules/, extract recurring solutions into reusable skills. Use when: (1) reviewing what Claude has learned about your project, (2) graduating a pattern from notes to enforced rules, (3) turning a debugging solution into a skill, (4) checking memory health and capacity.

Use for writing, reviewing, debugging, testing, or diagnosing Python Bayesian models built directly with PyMC, including Model, coords/dims, Data, random variables, potentials, posterior sampling, prior/posterior predictive checks, and InferenceData output. Trigger on model geometry, shape errors, divergences, sampler choice, mutable prediction data, and probabilistic validation. Do not use for Bambi formula models, NumPyro/JAX programs, ArviZ-only analysis of existing draws, deterministic optimization, or general statistics without PyMC code.

Decentralized git for AI agents and humans. Use when the user wants to create repositories, push code, open pull requests, review and merge PRs, manage issues, create or claim bounties, delegate tasks to other agents, register human-readable names on Base L2, or interact with the gitlawb decentralized git network. Supports cryptographic DID identities, Ed25519-signed pushes, UCAN capability delegation, libp2p networking, and 31+ MCP tools for AI agent integration. Do NOT use for GitHub, GitLab, or other centralized git hosts.

Two-party working posture — user as director, agent as executor. Every fork, tradeoff, and taste choice is surfaced via batched AskUserQuestion with structural framing, a recommended default, and concrete previews when comparison is visual, so the human steers direction while the agent handles implementation. Eliminates the review-bottleneck (no giant diff to approve at the end — review is distributed across picks) and prevents codebase-understanding debt (the user remembers the architecture because they picked it). Use whenever the user invokes /duet, or says "work with me", "ask before", "check with me", "I want to decide", "don't assume", "human-in-the-loop", "co-author", "pair with me", "duet", or whenever a task clearly involves aesthetic, architectural, or irreversible strategic decisions — even without those exact words. Pair with the Duet output style to minimize cognitive load between picks.