Results for “metric”

Benchmarks long-context language models across 20 sub-tasks spanning 3k–200k tokens, covering retrieval, reasoning, summarization, and instruction understanding, with exact-match accuracy as the primary metric.

Extracts structured channel-level and video detail data from a YouTube channel via the BrowserAct API, including metrics like views, likes, comments, and subscriber count.

Measures and improves the quality of AI models and agents on Google Cloud using the Eval Quality Flywheel methodology, including dataset creation, metric selection, failure analysis, and iterative improvement.

Installs and configures the official Google Ads MCP Server to connect AI assistants to Google Ads accounts for querying campaigns and retrieving reporting metrics using natural language.

Apply medicinal chemistry filters for compound triage: drug-likeness rules (Lipinski, Veber, CNS), structural alert catalogs (PAINS, NIBR, ChEMBL), complexity metrics, and a custom query language for library filtering.

Evaluates image captions by converting them into scene graphs and computing an F-score over semantic propositions, measuring how well a generated caption captures the meaning of an image compared to human references.

Benchmarks energy-function-based safe control algorithms on the BIS (Benchmark of Interactive Safety) dataset, scoring safety, efficiency, and hybrid performance in human-robot and robot co-working scenarios.

Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality. Industry standard from BigCode Project used by HuggingFace leaderboards.

Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality. Industry standard from BigCode Project used by HuggingFace leaderboards.

Provides a formal evaluation framework for Claude Code sessions, implementing eval-driven development (EDD) principles to define pass/fail criteria, measure reliability with pass@k metrics, and create regression test suites.

Design privacy-aware observability for AI agents using traces, spans, structured events, metrics, cost attribution, dashboards, alerts, and investigation workflows. Use when instrumenting an agent, debugging intermittent tool or model failures, defining service-level objectives, analyzing latency or spend, auditing agent decisions, or preparing production monitoring.

Evaluates automated metrics and vision-language models on identifying granular errors in detailed image descriptions and ranking paired descriptions against human judgments, using macro F1, pairwise accuracy, Spearman rank ρ, and Kendall's τ.

Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality.

End-to-end Kaggle competition workflow for scored submissions, covering code competitions, validation, metrics, public notebook/discussion intel, tabular/text/image modeling, tuning, ensembling, multi-notebook architectures, Kaggle GPU offload, and hidden-test debugging.

Perform survival analysis and time-to-event modeling in Python using scikit-survival, including Cox models, random survival forests, gradient boosting, survival SVMs, and evaluation metrics like concordance index and Brier score.

Expert startup business analyst specializing in market sizing, financial modeling, competitive analysis, and strategic planning for early-stage companies. Use PROACTIVELY when the user asks about market opportunity, TAM/SAM/SOM, financial projections, unit economics, competitive landscape, team planning, startup metrics, or business strategy for pre-seed through Series A startups.

Use when the user wants to train, compare, or export machine learning models using Classification Learner or Regression Learner — including opening the app, loading data, training models, evaluating metrics, comparing results, visualizing plots, testing on held-out data, exploring model interpretability, and exporting trained models. Programmatic access to Classification Learner and Regression Learner apps via AppController.

Multi-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.

Multi-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.

Multi-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.

Multi-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.

Multi-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.

Multi-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.

Use when a bounded textual artifact (prompt, rubric, tool description, extraction instruction) keeps underperforming and success can be measured with an evaluator, dataset, or trace set. GEPA proposes evaluator-backed candidate rewrites through a normal PR/proposal adoption gate. Do not use for vague behavior changes, governance/persona/core-memory edits, fake metrics, or problems whose first honest task is defining the evaluator or collecting data.

Enriches vague, low-detail prompts into structured, agent-optimized XML before execution. INVOKE IMMEDIATELY — before any tool use or file reads — when you detect any of these signals: prompt under 10 words with no file path or error message; vague action verbs with no object ("fix the bug", "make it better", "clean this up", "refactor this", "optimize performance", "improve the UI", "add authentication", "add payments", "add notifications", "build the feature"); CLARIFIER_ADVISORY in your context window; user says "clarify", "help me describe this", "enrich this prompt", "structure my request". Also triggers on: "make this work", "it's broken", "it looks bad", "add X" with no further detail, "implement Y" with no constraints. Do NOT trigger on: prompts ending with ?, prompts containing error messages or stack traces, prompts with specific file paths, prompts already containing acceptance criteria or success metrics.