Results for “ai-llm”

Agent wallet, identity, and paid tools in one package. Register an agent, fund it via Stripe or USDC, then use the balance for web search, AI image generation, AI video generation, AI music creation, X/Twitter search, email send/receive, SMS and voice calls, contacts management, and 100+ LLM models. The funding and identity layer for autonomous agents that need to spend money, send messages, make phone calls, or call paid APIs.

Create, validate, and consume Google's Open Knowledge Format (OKF) bundles — YAML-frontmatter Markdown files with type / title / description / resource / tags / timestamp fields for portable, interoperable AI-agent knowledge sharing. OKF formalizes the LLM-Wiki pattern into a vendor-neutral open specification so any producer can write and any agent can consume without translation. Routes: use `llm-wiki` for raw source capture + vault maintenance, `obsidian` for Obsidian-vault workflows, `graphify` for durable committed graphs, `scrapling` for web-content extraction into OKF docs. Triggers on: okf, open knowledge format, knowledge bundle, okf document, llm wiki standard, knowledge atom, agent context format, okf frontmatter, okf bundle, knowledge interoperability.

Expert guidance for Groq, the LLM inference platform that provides the fastest token generation speeds available, powered by custom LPU (Language Processing Unit) hardware. Helps developers integrate Groq's API for real-time AI applications where latency matters — chatbots, code completion, and streaming responses.

Build type-safe AI agents and graph-based workflows with PydanticAI and PydanticGraph. Agent creation, function tools, capabilities, dependency injection, structured output, streaming, multi-agent patterns, testing, evals, and graph state machines. Use whenever you are building agents, tool-using LLM workflows, or graph-based state machines in Python.

Scaffold and implement Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers that expose external services, APIs, and data sources as typed tools and resources for LLM agents. Use when the user says "build an MCP server", "give Claude access to X", "create an MCP tool", "expose my API to an agent", or "AI agent integration".

Patterns and techniques for evaluating and improving AI agent outputs. Use this skill when: - Implementing self-critique and reflection loops - Building evaluator-optimizer pipelines for quality-critical generation - Creating test-driven code refinement workflows - Designing rubric-based or LLM-as-judge evaluation systems - Adding iterative improvement to agent outputs (code, reports, analysis) - Measuring and improving agent response quality

Humanize LLM output so it reads like a careful human wrote it. Subtracts AI-isms (sycophancy, tricolons, em-dash overuse, "delve"/"tapestry"/"testament", hedging stacks, tidy five-paragraph shapes), engineers burstiness and calibrated uncertainty, and preserves technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: subtle, balanced (default), full, voice-match, anti-detector. Use when user says "humanize this", "make this sound human", "de-slop this", "rewrite without AI tone", "match my voice", "less robotic", or invokes /unslop. Also auto-triggers when text-quality is requested.

Server-Sent Events for real-time server-to-client streaming. Express, Fastify, FastAPI, Spring WebFlux SSE implementations. Event streams, reconnection, and EventSource API. USE WHEN: user mentions "SSE", "Server-Sent Events", "EventSource", "event stream", "text/event-stream", "live feed", "streaming updates" DO NOT USE FOR: bidirectional communication - use `socket-io`; WebRTC - use `webrtc`; LLM streaming - use AI SDK skills

Build a fully automated AI-powered data collection agent for any public source — job boards, prices, news, GitHub, sports, anything. Scrapes on a schedule, enriches data with a free LLM (Gemini Flash), stores results in Notion/Sheets/Supabase, and learns from user feedback. Runs 100% free on GitHub Actions.

Build a fully automated AI-powered data collection agent for any public source — job boards, prices, news, GitHub, sports, anything. Scrapes on a schedule, enriches data with a free LLM (Gemini Flash), stores results in Notion/Sheets/Supabase, and learns from user feedback. Runs 100% free on GitHub Actions. Use when the user wants to monitor, collect, or track any public data automatically.

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST

Build a fully automated AI-powered data collection agent for any public source — job boards, prices, news, GitHub, sports, anything. Scrapes on a schedule, enriches data with a free LLM (Gemini Flash), stores results in Notion/Sheets/Supabase, and learns from user feedback. Runs 100% free on GitHub Actions. Use when the user wants to monitor, collect, or track any public data automatically.

Generates NeMo Guardrails Colang (.co) files and YAML config blocks from a plain-language description of a chatbot's purpose, allowed behaviors, and constraints. Use this skill whenever a user wants to build guardrails for a chatbot, define allowed intents for an LLM, create an AI firewall with NeMo Guardrails, generate Colang flow definitions, or configure a semantic allow-list for a bot. Trigger this skill even when the user just describes what their bot should and shouldn't do — generating the Colang and YAML is almost always what they need next.

Route LangSmith work into one workflow packet before touching SDK code. Use when the user needs LangSmith tracing, offline evals, annotation/review queues, prompt-registry decisions, audit/gap review, or cross-service trace propagation for an LLM app or agent workflow. Choose one packet: trace-debug, eval, review, prompt-registry, propagation, or audit. Triggers on: LangSmith, LangChain tracing, `@traceable` / `traceable`, `wrap_openai` / `wrapOpenAI`, datasets, experiments, annotation queues, feedback criteria, Prompt Hub, run trees, trace IDs, or production confidence for an AI feature. Not for generic SLO/alert design, non-LangSmith deployment orchestration, or runtime guardrails outside LangSmith.

Instrument a shipped product's AI agents with tracing and observability so you can see what they did, why outputs happened, and what each run cost. Plain-language primer plus free-tier-first backend selection (Langfuse, Phoenix, LangSmith, Braintrust) and OpenTelemetry/OpenInference instrumentation. Load when the user asks to add observability, add tracing, instrument my agents, see what my agent is doing in production, set up Langfuse or Phoenix or LangSmith, debug why my agent gave a bad answer, or track LLM cost per request. Also fires when agent-system-architecture or setup-evaluation requires an observability plan for an agent-chain product. NOT for tracing the coding agent itself — that is run-trace. Precondition for runtime-learning-loop.

Rewrite any prompt, instruction, task description, or spec into a "genie-proof" version — instructions so explicit, literal, and loophole-free that even a maliciously literal genie (or an LLM, contractor, or junior dev) could not misinterpret them. Use this skill whenever the user asks to genie-proof, tighten, harden, de-ambiguate, or "make bulletproof" a prompt or instruction; whenever they complain that an AI/model/person "didn't do what I meant," "took me too literally," or "found a loophole"; or whenever they hand over a vague prompt and ask to make it precise, explicit, unambiguous, or idiot-proof. Also trigger on phrases like "wish to a genie," "monkey's paw," "lawyer-proof this prompt," or "leave nothing to interpretation."