Results for “audience-overlap”

Defines the caption model (drop/rail/embed) and overlay law for compositing captions on top of video, never reserving a bottom band.

Design and verify auditable human oversight, approval gates, escalation paths, and safe state transitions for AI agent workflows. Use when deciding which agent actions require review, adding approve/reject or dual-control flows, preventing unauthorized autonomous effects, creating decision records, reducing rubber-stamping, or recovering safely from rejected, expired, or failed actions.

Nonlinear dimensionality reduction with UMAP — fast manifold learning for 2D/3D visualization, clustering preprocessing (e.g., HDBSCAN), and supervised or parametric UMAP. Use when projecting high-dimensional data to low dimensions for visualization, embedding generation, or as a preprocessing step before clustering. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Use to audit a help centre or knowledge base against the conversations customers actually have, finding coverage gaps, stale articles and unused content. Trigger for "what should we write help articles about", "audit our knowledge base", KB coverage gaps, self-service deflection content, or preparing a knowledge base to ground an AI support agent.

Perform fast genomic interval operations (overlap, nearest, merge, coverage, cluster, complement, subtract, count-overlaps), multi-format bioinformatics I/O, DataFusion SQL, and pileup on Polars DataFrames via the polars-bio library, serving as a scalable alternative to bioframe and bedtools.

OWL v5.2 — Pure contrarian. One scanner, one thesis: the crowd is wrong. Monitors crowding across top 30 assets (funding extremity, OI concentration, SM tilt). When crowding persists 4+ hours AND exhaustion signals fire (volume declining, price stalling, RSI divergence), enters AGAINST the crowd to ride the liquidation unwind. 1-2 trades per day max. Re-crowding exit: if the crowd comes back, thesis is dead, exit immediately. DSL High Water Mode (mandatory). The patient predator. v5.2: funding floor lowered from 20% to 12% so the five-factor scoring model actually runs. Added observability logging (top 3 crowding scores per scan cycle).

Two-party working posture — user as director, agent as executor. Every fork, tradeoff, and taste choice is surfaced via batched AskUserQuestion with structural framing, a recommended default, and concrete previews when comparison is visual, so the human steers direction while the agent handles implementation. Eliminates the review-bottleneck (no giant diff to approve at the end — review is distributed across picks) and prevents codebase-understanding debt (the user remembers the architecture because they picked it). Use whenever the user invokes /duet, or says "work with me", "ask before", "check with me", "I want to decide", "don't assume", "human-in-the-loop", "co-author", "pair with me", "duet", or whenever a task clearly involves aesthetic, architectural, or irreversible strategic decisions — even without those exact words. Pair with the Duet output style to minimize cognitive load between picks.