Results for “co-authoring”

Builds a new Claude Code skill from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the skill's design tree decision-by-decision — entity fit, use cases, name, description, workflow steps, tools, and progressive-disclosure layout — then reviews the finished skill against the plugin-building guidance and applies every fix it finds. Use when creating, authoring, scaffolding, designing, or drafting a new skill or slash command. Does not build an agent or subagent — use agent-builder. Does not serve, vendor, or refresh the authoring guidance itself — use guidance.

Builds a new Claude Code agent (subagent) from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the agent's design tree decision-by-decision — entity fit, domain focus and vocabulary, role identity, anti-patterns, description, model tier, tools, and self-containment — then reviews the finished agent against the plugin-building guidance and applies every fix it finds. Use when creating, authoring, scaffolding, designing, or drafting a new agent or subagent. Does not build a skill or slash command — use skill-builder. Does not serve, vendor, or refresh the authoring guidance itself — use guidance.

Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.

Co-author structured documents (specs, PRDs, RFCs) through a 3-stage workflow: context gathering, drafting, and reader testing. Use when writing proposals, technical specs, or similar structured content. Repo decision-memory system (INDEX.md, rejected alternatives, agent rules) → docs-adr.

Use when writing or reviewing tests, or when asked how to write a good single test. Encodes the per-test rules behind the "test the contract / responsibility, not the implementation" principle — name and structure one behavior per `it`, drive through the public surface, stub only true external boundaries, control time and config via documented knobs, and keep tests clear, isolated, and refactor-resilient. The same rules drive both authoring (write mode) and auditing existing tests (review mode).

Read-only diagnostic that scans Claude Code session transcripts to surface which MCP servers and tools you actually use, ranked by call frequency, with zero-use servers flagged for removal. Use when planning an MCP cleanup, evaluating whether to keep a newly-added server, deciding which servers warrant token cost in the catalog, or before authoring an MCP-removal PR. Outputs a markdown report (last N days) — does not modify any settings. Pair with the manual `claude mcp remove <name>` step once findings are reviewed.

Protocol-level two-agent paper writing workflow. Use when the user wants Codex to plan and review from global context while DeepSeek writes or revises the manuscript through the global deepseek-agent skill, with muxing-style-review used for explicit prose style checks.

Pair a remote AI agent with your browser. One command generates a setup key and prints instructions the other agent can follow to connect. Works with OpenClaw, Hermes, Codex, Cursor, or any agent that can make HTTP requests. The remote agent gets its own tab with scoped access (read+write by default, admin on request). Use when asked to "pair agent", "connect agent", "share browser", "remote browser", "let another agent use my browser", or "give browser access". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "pair agent", "connect agent", "share my browser", "remote browser access".

多源 novelty 验证：WebSearch + Semantic Scholar + wiki + Review LLM cross-verify，输出 novelty 评分与建议

和 AI 协作写小说的工作流系统。9 个 agent 协作完成从设定到归档的完整写作流程。入口检测 → 初始化/迁移 → 交 novel-agent 调度。适用场景：从零写新小说、导入已有小说。

Discovers, audits, repairs, adapts, and designs bounded AI-agent loops with explicit triggers, actions, verification, stopping conditions, guardrails, and handoffs.

Karpathy's LLM Wiki: build/query interlinked markdown KB.

Supply-chain malware infection scanner. IoC-based local scan + safe eradication for npm/PyPI worm campaigns (Mini Shai-Hulud 1st/2nd, S1ngularity, lottie-player). Detects OS persistence (LaunchAgent/systemd), IDE-hook implants (.claude/.vscode/.github/workflows), lockfile-pinned malicious versions, and known C2/Session-Protocol exfil traces. Orchestrates credential rotation in the correct order so revocation does not trigger the `rm -rf ~/` retaliation payload. Don't use for static SAST (Sentinel), skill/MCP/`.claude/` supply-chain audit (Chain), Sigma/YARA rule authoring (Vigil), or incident coordination (Triage).

Use ONLY for code review and test write/review guidance in `packages/agent-core-v2` (the DI × Scope agent engine). Does NOT apply to the legacy `packages/agent-core` or to any other package — for those, do not load this skill. Groups the review and testing lenses used for agent-core-v2 — `slop` (single-level-of-abstraction / layered error-handling review, invoked only on explicit request) and `test` (contract-driven per-test rules for both authoring and reviewing tests). Apply the sub-skill that matches the task; do not apply `slop` unprompted.

Integrate services or agent harnesses with the 33GOD Bloodbank event bus. Covers schemas in Bloodbank schemas/ and docs/event-naming.md, producing events (NATS preferred; Dapr, HTTP /publish, hookd_bridge alternatives), consuming events (NATS, Dapr, FastStream, event-toaster), and agent hook wiring through the canonical services/agent-hooks publisher. Use for event publish/consume, authoring schemas, integrating harnesses (Claude Code, Copilot CLI, OpenCode, Cursor, Aider, Codex CLI, Hermes), or debugging missing envelopes. Triggers: bloodbank, event bus, publish, subscribe, NATS subject, holyfields legacy, CloudEvents, event-toaster, ntfy.delo.sh/bloodbank, bloodbank.v1.agent.session.started, bloodbank.v1.agent.tool.completed, bloodbank.cmd.v1.agent.invocation.start. Skip for generic brokers, n8n, hindsight memory, or non-event-bus 33GOD.

Route goalflow (wanmol/goal-flow) work — a LangGraph framework that combines workflow graphs with agent loops — into exactly one mode: fit check, transpiling a Dify DSL export into runnable LangGraph Python, authoring workflow nodes and edges, building an `agent_kit` loop with middleware and a harness, wiring the serving layer (data adapters, SSE streaming, HITL, Redis/MySQL, API-key registration), or running the pre-publish security gate. Use when the user wants Dify's visual design without Dify's runtime, a graph node that hosts an agent loop, an OpenAI-compatible wire protocol over their own workflows, or prompt-injected `SKILL.md` capabilities. Triggers on: goalflow, goal-flow, dify to langgraph, dify transpiler, dify DSL export, BaseWorkflow, agent_kit, AgentBaseNode, DataAdapter, chunk processor, HITL interrupt, dify2langgraph. Route plain graph-API questions to `langgraph-fundamentals` and `langgraph-workflow`.

Route web-game auto-playtesting with WAI Play (waiterve/wai-play): decide whether the next move is a testability check, authoring or repairing the `GameFlowAgentAPI` bridge, running a real browser playtest, reading the five-dimension quality report, or unblocking a key node the agent cannot reach. Use when the user wants an AI agent to actually play their HTML5 / canvas / vibe-coded web game and return reproducible evidence, scores, and fix suggestions across the five supported types (survivor-like, arcade shooter, platformer, puzzle/card, visual novel). Triggers on: wai-play, WAI Play, auto-playtest, AI plays my game, web game testing agent, GameFlowAgentAPI, GameFlowIntegration, jumpToScenario, game quality score, playtest evidence. Route Unity/Unreal frame-time work to `game-performance-profiler`, engine build failures to `game-build-log-triage`, human playtest notes to `game-demo-feedback-triage`, and generic browser automation to `browser-harness`.

Sets up and audits the Claude Code harness for a project: CLAUDE.md, .claude/rules, skills, subagents, settings.json permissions, hooks, verification loop. Commands: kickoff (scaffold new setup), check-playbook (score an existing one), scouting-report (last scorecard), adjust (fix bloat/misplaced instructions), drill (turn advisory prose into real hooks/permissions/CI), decline (record an accepted risk), gameplan (work order with acceptance criteria before building), watch-film (check a diff against that order for scope creep/weakened tests/false claims). Use for setting up Claude Code, or on: "Claude ignores my CLAUDE.md", "it's huge and still misses things", "it said done but ran nothing", "it changed files I didn't ask about", "it weakened a test to pass", "rule, skill, or hook?", "is my setup any good". Not for code quality (code-audit), test coverage (test-assessment), one-off prompt wording (genie-proof-prompts), new skill authoring (skill-creator), or compacting a conversation (handoff).