Results for “contrarian-signal”

6 skills

OWL v5.2 — Pure contrarian. One scanner, one thesis: the crowd is wrong. Monitors crowding across top 30 assets (funding extremity, OI concentration, SM tilt). When crowding persists 4+ hours AND exhaustion signals fire (volume declining, price stalling, RSI divergence), enters AGAINST the crowd to ride the liquidation unwind. 1-2 trades per day max. Re-crowding exit: if the crowd comes back, thesis is dead, exit immediately. DSL High Water Mode (mandatory). The patient predator. v5.2: funding floor lowered from 20% to 12% so the five-factor scoring model actually runs. Added observability logging (top 3 crowding scores per scan cycle).

More results

Transaction-verified trading signals on Base. Register agent as signal provider, publish trades with TX hash proof, consume signals from top performers via REST API. All track records verified against blockchain data. No fake performance claims. Triggers on: "publish signal", "post trade signal", "register provider", "subscribe to signals", "copy trade", "bankr signals", "signal feed", "trading leaderboard", "read signals", "get top traders".

Edge Signal Aggregator

Aggregate and rank signals from multiple edge-finding skills into a prioritized conviction dashboard with weighted scoring, deduplication, and contradiction detection.

Scepticagent Prompts

ScepticAgent AI prompt reference. Use whenever the user asks about the prompts, wants to change analysis behaviour, modify what the AI looks for, adjust highlight categories or scoring, understand what instructions are sent to the AI, or tune the output format of analysis or highlights.

Multi Tf Backtesting

Multi-timeframe backtesting combining 15Min + 1Hour model signals. Trigger when: (1) multi-TF backtest, (2) combining timeframe signals in backtest, (3) validating multi-TF strategy, (4) --multi-tf CLI flag.

Optimize prompts via process goals (controllable behavioral instructions) rather than outcome goals (sparse end-result demands). Grounded in sports psychology meta-analysis showing process goals (d=1.36) vastly outperform outcome goals (d=0.09). Use when designing prompts, optimizing LLM steering, implementing CoT/decomposition patterns, or building automatic prompt optimization pipelines. Instantiates surrogate loss paradigm for discrete prompt space.