Results for “edit-gate”

Use `task-agent` to update source-backed documentation or `review-agent` to assess documentation impact and accuracy when public behavior or operator workflows change. Skip work with no audience-facing behavior change.

Use `analysis-agent` to map acceptance to validation, `task-agent` to add or run bounded tests, and `review-agent` to assess proof coverage. Skip work with no material change or already-fresh complete validation.

Turn observed run outputs into eval-spec Artifacts, paired Gates, and policy bindings. Use when creating or calibrating automated, human, or LLM-as-judge eval gates for processkit workflows.

Runs regression evaluations comparing agent edits against human-approved golden projects, and registers new goldens after human approval.

Use `task-agent` for bounded logging changes or `review-agent` to independently assess placement, schema, severity, redaction, correlation, and signal tradeoffs. Skip work with no logging impact and self-review requests.

Adds input and output guardrails to an agent, including validation, content filtering, domain scoping, and rate limiting, with TypeScript examples and wiring instructions.

Use when a bounded textual artifact (prompt, rubric, tool description, extraction instruction) keeps underperforming and success can be measured with an evaluator, dataset, or trace set. GEPA proposes evaluator-backed candidate rewrites through a normal PR/proposal adoption gate. Do not use for vague behavior changes, governance/persona/core-memory edits, fake metrics, or problems whose first honest task is defining the evaluator or collecting data.

Audits natural-language programming artifacts such as SKILL.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, slash commands, plugin manifests, hooks, rules, and prompt files. Use when reviewing AI-agent repositories, checking manifest-vs-disk consistency, scoring skill or agent quality, adding NL artifact CI gates, or diagnosing vocabulary and version drift across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and Antigravity-style projects.

Meta-adder for toolkit artifacts. Single entry point to add a skill, pattern, best-practice, hook, agent, or guide with correct frontmatter + sync to 4 publish targets.

Use `analysis-agent` to analyze permissions, secrets, sensitive data, trust boundaries, and injection; `task-agent` to implement controls; and `review-agent` to assess evidence. Skip self-review and no-trust-impact work.

Session-start meta-skill that enforces the 1% rule: before any action on a processkit entity or context/ file, if there is even a 1% chance a processkit skill applies, you MUST check skill-finder first. Load this skill at the start of every session that may involve processkit work. Use when beginning a new task, when unsure which skill applies, or when you are about to edit context/, create an entity, or run an MCP tool.

Tactical fast path: turn a small problem, bug report, edit request, or narrow refactor into three deliverables — a brief change-spec (docs/specs/), a detailed implementation-ready plan (docs/plans/), and a TODO.md with agent-pickable tasks and milestones. Load when the user describes a tactical problem and wants quick planning artifacts, says "plan this change", "create a TODO", "write a plan for this", "problem to plan", "break this into tasks for agents", "I want to change X — plan it", or when process-decomposer routes here after determining the user needs lightweight planning deliverables. Also triggers on "create tasks from this problem", "make this actionable", or "turn this into a plan agents can execute". For feature-sized work that needs an executable spec + constitution + cross-check gate, route to `spec-driven-development` (or `feature-spec`) instead.