Results for “loop-review”

Discover, find, compare, audit, repair, adapt, craft, run, debrief, and prepare repeatable AI-agent loops for publication. Use when a user asks to analyze code or coding threads for recurring work, find a published loop, interview them to turn a goal into a bounded loop, review a loop...

Discover, find, compare, audit, repair, adapt, craft, run, debrief, and prepare repeatable AI-agent loops for publication. Use when a user asks to analyze code or coding threads for recurring work, find a published loop, interview them to turn a goal into a bounded loop, review a loop...

Orchestrates a multi-agent build session, acting as manager to cut goals into units, spawn implementer and tester subagents, and run test-and-review loops with anti-thrash guardrails.

End-to-end review of agent validation system for live trader readiness. Audits gating thresholds, model health wiring, live feedback loop, notebook consistency.

Multi-agent adversarial verification with convergence loop. Two independent review agents must both pass before output ships.

Multi-agent adversarial verification with convergence loop. Two independent review agents must both pass before output ships.

Multi-agent adversarial verification with convergence loop. Two independent review agents must both pass before output ships.

Orchestrates end-to-end autonomous AI research projects using a two-loop architecture for rapid experimentation and synthesis, producing papers and presentations.

通用跨模型审查：Review LLM 对任意研究制品进行独立评审，输出结构化评分、wiki 实体映射与改进建议

Never show the user a first draft. Run every writing task through a self-critique loop — draft, attack the draft as the harshest reviewer in the room, rewrite, and repeat until a full review pass finds zero flags — then return only the final plus a change log. Use for any writing the user actually cares about: emails, LinkedIn posts, newsletters, docs, announcements, client messages. Trigger whenever the user says 'run the loop', 'self-critique this', 'make it bulletproof', 'don't give me a first draft', 'be brutal', or hands over a task where quality matters more than speed. This is a single-agent loop; for the three-agent version use the-team.

Automates repeated rounds of Copilot code review on GitHub pull requests: triggers review, triages threads, dispatches parallel fix agents, commits, replies, and loops until convergence.

LLM-assisted human-in-the-loop review. Make sense of a change, focus attention where it matters, test. Use when the user says "checkpoint", "human review", or "walk me through this change".

LLM-assisted human-in-the-loop review. Make sense of a change, focus attention where it matters, test. Use when the user says "checkpoint", "human review", or "walk me through this change".

Patterns, conventions, and guardrails for the closed-loop systems in AegisNex. Covers the AI intelligence graph, Guardian auto-restart, multi-agent orchestration, incident lifecycle, self-improvement memory, and risk/policy gates.

针对 Modular RAG MCP Server 项目的老师式复习 Agent。按章节带领用户系统复习项目知识点，每道题互动问答、给出参考答案，复习结束后记录掌握进度，每次开始时回顾上次进度并建议继续或复习。Use when user says '复习项目', '帮我复习', '带我复习', '开始复习', '项目复习', 'review project', 'study review', '学习复习', '复盘', or wants to systematically review and study the project.

Orchestrates bounded, governed iteration loops over existing agent commands and offices, with explicit stopping conditions, checkpoints, and honest terminal states.

针对 Modular RAG MCP Server 项目的老师式复习 Agent。按章节带领用户系统复习项目知识点，每道题互动问答、给出参考答案，复习结束后记录掌握进度，每次开始时回顾上次进度并建议继续或复习。Use when user says '复习项目', '帮我复习', '带我复习', '开始复习', '项目复习', 'review project', 'study review', '学习复习', '复盘', or wants to systematically review and study the project.

Turn a PR, diff, merge request, or patch stack into one evidence-first review brief with severity, missing-proof checks, and route-outs.

Orchestrate expensive frontier models as reviewers and cheaper subagents for bounded, token-heavy work to optimize cost and quality.

Spawns GLM-5 powered teammates with native thinking mode for coding, review, testing, planning, and research tasks.

Exact rendered-UI feedback router → choose copy-paste review, watch-loop sync, self-driving critique, or platform setup. MCP: npx add-mcp "npx -y agentation-mcp server"

Call a DeepSeek-backed OpenCode agent as a separate critique, writing, or revision agent from Codex. Use when Codex needs to delegate adversarial research critique, novelty skepticism, method review, manuscript prose, LaTeX section drafting, academic text revision, or paper-writing feedback loops to DeepSeek.

Design and operate bounded multi-agent workflows with task decomposition, dependency graphs, ownership, handoff contracts, shared-state controls, approvals, recovery, and synthesis. Use when a task contains genuinely independent workstreams, specialized roles, parallel research or implementation, reviewer-worker loops, or coordination problems that one agent should not execute sequentially.

Design and verify auditable human oversight, approval gates, escalation paths, and safe state transitions for AI agent workflows. Use when deciding which agent actions require review, adding approve/reject or dual-control flows, preventing unauthorized autonomous effects, creating decision records, reducing rubber-stamping, or recovering safely from rejected, expired, or failed actions.

Sid Orchestra — portable multi-agent swarm for any Cursor workspace. Run IDs, lock leases, plan critic, canary harness, PASS/FAIL evals, anti-hallucination. Use when the user says sid orchestra, @sid-orchestra, sid swarm, sid evals, or wants research→plan→build→review with a bus and loop. Available globally from ~/.cursor/skills.

Run three agents as a newsroom — a Writer, an Editor, and a Fact-checker — that draft, critique, and verify in parallel and argue until the writing survives with zero flags. This is the level above a single self-review loop, for the pieces that matter most. Best run in Claude Cowork against the user's files. Use for high-stakes writing the user wants bulletproof: a newsletter, a launch post, a client email, a public announcement. Trigger whenever the user says 'run the team', 'use the swarm', 'writer editor fact-checker', 'spawn agents to work on this', or wants the strongest possible version of a piece. For a lighter single-agent loop, use red-pen instead.

Two-party working posture — user as director, agent as executor. Every fork, tradeoff, and taste choice is surfaced via batched AskUserQuestion with structural framing, a recommended default, and concrete previews when comparison is visual, so the human steers direction while the agent handles implementation. Eliminates the review-bottleneck (no giant diff to approve at the end — review is distributed across picks) and prevents codebase-understanding debt (the user remembers the architecture because they picked it). Use whenever the user invokes /duet, or says "work with me", "ask before", "check with me", "I want to decide", "don't assume", "human-in-the-loop", "co-author", "pair with me", "duet", or whenever a task clearly involves aesthetic, architectural, or irreversible strategic decisions — even without those exact words. Pair with the Duet output style to minimize cognitive load between picks.