Results for “parallel-review”

Orchestrate expensive frontier models as reviewers and cheaper subagents for bounded, token-heavy work to optimize cost and quality.

Spawns GLM-5 powered teammates with native thinking mode for coding, review, testing, planning, and research tasks.

Orchestrate token-heavy research, coding, and testing by delegating bounded tasks to cheaper subagents while reserving Claude Fable for architecture, synthesis, and final review.

Reference guide for evaluating LLM-generated translations between CUDA and OpenMP, covering memory model mapping, kernel launch patterns, shared memory, atomics, and common failure modes.

Parallel execution engine for high-throughput task completion

multi-llm-review

通用跨模型审查：Review LLM 对任意研究制品进行独立评审，输出结构化评分、wiki 实体映射与改进建议

Reviews a pull request: runs its own baseline review of the PR diff, then a persistent Monitor watches CI and incoming reviewer comments, triages each comment through an independent skeptical agent, applies only verified fixes, and commits+pushes via inline git commands until CI passes and no comments remain to adopt — then asks whether to merge. Use this skill when the user asks to "review a PR", "monitor PR review comments", "address reviewer feedback on #123", or "watch CI on a pull request".

Builds an evidence-backed ECC install plan for a repository by sorting skills, commands, rules, hooks, and extras into DAILY vs LIBRARY buckets using parallel repo-aware review passes.

Scales reinforcement learning with PufferLib — high-throughput parallel training (PuffeRL), vectorized environments, and native multi-agent systems achieving 2-10x speedups over standard implementations. Use when scaling RL to millions of steps per second, running vectorized or multi-agent setups, building custom PufferEnv tasks, or integrating game environments (Atari, Procgen, NetHack, PettingZoo). For standard single-agent algorithm implementations (PPO/SAC/DQN) or quick prototyping prefer alterlab-stable-baselines3. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Multi-agent orchestration patterns. Use when multiple independent tasks can run with different domain expertise or when comprehensive analysis requires multiple perspectives.

针对 Modular RAG MCP Server 项目的老师式复习 Agent。按章节带领用户系统复习项目知识点，每道题互动问答、给出参考答案，复习结束后记录掌握进度，每次开始时回顾上次进度并建议继续或复习。Use when user says '复习项目', '帮我复习', '带我复习', '开始复习', '项目复习', 'review project', 'study review', '学习复习', '复盘', or wants to systematically review and study the project.

Merges agent or review outputs into one deduplicated, evidence-linked, severity-ranked actionable report.

Multi-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.

Orchestrating multi-session parallel execution via Claude Code Agent Teams API and Codex CLI Subagents — launch, manage, coordinate concurrent tasks. Use when parallel work is needed.

Investigates bugs, regressions, and crashes by dispatching four parallel read-only sub-agents, then ranks hypotheses and recommends the fastest proof or fix path.

Multi-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.

Multi-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.

针对 Modular RAG MCP Server 项目的老师式复习 Agent。按章节带领用户系统复习项目知识点，每道题互动问答、给出参考答案，复习结束后记录掌握进度，每次开始时回顾上次进度并建议继续或复习。Use when user says '复习项目', '帮我复习', '带我复习', '开始复习', '项目复习', 'review project', 'study review', '学习复习', '复盘', or wants to systematically review and study the project.

多源 novelty 验证：WebSearch + Semantic Scholar + wiki + Review LLM cross-verify，输出 novelty 评分与建议

Multi-agent orchestration patterns. Use when multiple independent tasks can run with different domain expertise or when comprehensive analysis requires multiple perspectives.

Runs the current git diff through the Codex CLI for an independent, read-only second-opinion review, then triages findings back into the session for Claude to apply fixes.

Multi-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.

Builds an evidence-backed ECC install plan for a repository by sorting skills, commands, rules, hooks, and extras into DAILY vs LIBRARY buckets using parallel repo-aware review passes.

Build an evidence-backed ECC install plan for a specific repo by sorting skills, commands, rules, hooks, and extras into DAILY vs LIBRARY buckets using parallel repo-aware review passes. Use when ECC should be trimmed to what a project actually needs instead of loading the full bundle.

Build an evidence-backed ECC install plan for a specific repo by sorting skills, commands, rules, hooks, and extras into DAILY vs LIBRARY buckets using parallel repo-aware review passes. Use when ECC should be trimmed to what a project actually needs instead of loading the full bundle.

Build an evidence-backed ECC install plan for a specific repo by sorting skills, commands, rules, hooks, and extras into DAILY vs LIBRARY buckets using parallel repo-aware review passes. Use when ECC should be trimmed to what a project actually needs instead of loading the full bundle.

Composite skill — full project health check across testing, config, hooks, performance, security, MCP, and plugins. Runs the audit skills in parallel and reconciles into one severity-ranked report with prioritized remediation plan. Use weekly per active project, before major releases, or as part of quarterly tech-debt review.

Design and operate bounded multi-agent workflows with task decomposition, dependency graphs, ownership, handoff contracts, shared-state controls, approvals, recovery, and synthesis. Use when a task contains genuinely independent workstreams, specialized roles, parallel research or implementation, reviewer-worker loops, or coordination problems that one agent should not execute sequentially.

Orchestrate a fleet of parallel `codex exec` workers with you (Claude Code) as the supervisor — spawn one per isolated git worktree, dispatch headless, verify each INDEPENDENTLY, PR/merge. The manual "codex-ultracode" pattern for fanning out real implementation, research, or review work onto Codex. Bakes in the hard gotchas (stdin blocking, background tracking, don't-trust-self-reports, writer isolation). Triggers on — orchestrate codex, codex workers, codex fleet, spawn codex, delegate to codex in parallel, manual ultracode, 开 codex 小弟, 派 codex worker — NOT for a single cross-vendor opinion (use the `second-opinion-codex` agent), NOT for web-UI worker decomposition (use `/orchestrate`).