Results for “plan-review”

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

Use this agent when a major project step has been completed and needs to be reviewed against the original plan and coding standards.

Generates a step-by-step construction plan from a one-line objective, where each step is self-contained and executable by a fresh agent in a new session.

Agent profile for review Android Compose code, lifecycle, permissions, navigation, Material behavior, performance, and Play release risks. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Orchestrates building a new feature end-to-end by delegating research, planning, TDD implementation, review, and gated commit to specialized agents.

Spawns GLM-5 powered teammates with thinking mode for coding, review, testing, planning, and research tasks.

Builds an evidence-backed ECC install plan for a repository by sorting skills, commands, rules, hooks, and extras into DAILY vs LIBRARY buckets using parallel repo-aware review passes.

Agent profile for plan PPC account structure, creative testing, budget hypotheses, measurement, and landing-page alignment. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Agent profile for review API platform contracts, versioning, auth, rate limits, SDK clients, and developer experience. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Agent profile for review pricing, invoices, subscriptions, entitlements, revenue logic, tax-sensitive flows, and billing UX. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Agent profile for review prompt injection, tool boundaries, untrusted content, data exfiltration, and human approval gates. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

`analysis-agent`/`task-agent`/`review-agent`: discover source of truth, candidate owner, and change surface before planning; hand known candidates to impact inspection.

针对 Modular RAG MCP Server 项目的老师式复习 Agent。按章节带领用户系统复习项目知识点，每道题互动问答、给出参考答案，复习结束后记录掌握进度，每次开始时回顾上次进度并建议继续或复习。Use when user says '复习项目', '帮我复习', '带我复习', '开始复习', '项目复习', 'review project', 'study review', '学习复习', '复盘', or wants to systematically review and study the project.

Builds an evidence-backed ECC install plan for a repository by sorting skills, commands, rules, hooks, and extras into DAILY vs LIBRARY buckets using parallel repo-aware review passes.

Analyze the available skill set and recommend candidate groups that could be consolidated into sub-skill bundles. Read-only — proposes a plan, does not move files.

通用跨模型审查：Review LLM 对任意研究制品进行独立评审，输出结构化评分、wiki 实体映射与改进建议

Spawns GLM-5 powered teammates with native thinking mode for coding, review, testing, planning, and research tasks.

OWASP Top 10 + Supabase-first hardening burndown. Use when "security audit plan", "OWASP audit", "hardening plan", or "security burndown". App-layer auth flows → audit-auth-flows. Table RLS → plan-rls-audit. Key rotation → plan-secrets-audit. App LLM attacks → audit-llm-security.

Use an independently assigned `review-agent` for post-authoring review of changed rd-skills routing registries, fixtures, mappings, or owner conflicts without repair. Skip product work and in-task global rerouting.

针对 Modular RAG MCP Server 项目的老师式复习 Agent。按章节带领用户系统复习项目知识点，每道题互动问答、给出参考答案，复习结束后记录掌握进度，每次开始时回顾上次进度并建议继续或复习。Use when user says '复习项目', '帮我复习', '带我复习', '开始复习', '项目复习', 'review project', 'study review', '学习复习', '复盘', or wants to systematically review and study the project.

Turn a PR, diff, merge request, or patch stack into one evidence-first review brief with severity, missing-proof checks, and route-outs.

Code review skill — auto-scopes from git changes, reads DOJO.md for project conventions, and produces structured findings with priority levels. Supports quick single-pass review and deep 3-agent parallel audit.

Protocol-level two-agent paper writing workflow. Use when the user wants Codex to plan and review from global context while DeepSeek writes or revises the manuscript through the global deepseek-agent skill, with muxing-style-review used for explicit prose style checks.

Analyse student work against criteria to identify specific gaps between current performance and learning objectives. Use when reviewing submissions, planning feedback, or diagnosing learning needs.

Design and implement clear, modular, resilient software and create executor-grade implementation plans with explicit scope, drift checks, verification gates, tests, STOP conditions, dependencies, and delegated-work review. Use for development, refactoring, architecture, implementation planning, safe migrations, handoffs to another engineer or agent, or verifying delegated code changes.

Builds a feature specification from scratch with plan-a-feature and publishes it to a user-specified Confluence location, posting the spec as a parent page and each companion artifact (decision log, team findings, technical notes) as a child page beneath it. Use when the user wants a new feature planned, designed, scoped, or specified AND posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not plan to local files only — use plan-a-feature. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not refine or stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review. Does not document already-built features to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence.

Sid Orchestra — portable multi-agent swarm for any Cursor workspace. Run IDs, lock leases, plan critic, canary harness, PASS/FAIL evals, anti-hallucination. Use when the user says sid orchestra, @sid-orchestra, sid swarm, sid evals, or wants research→plan→build→review with a bus and loop. Available globally from ~/.cursor/skills.

Agent profile for analyze target users, workflows, usability risks, research questions, and evidence gaps. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Use Heroku Managed Inference and Agents with the current Heroku AI workflow. Use when the agent needs to install or inspect the Heroku AI CLI plugin, provision Heroku inference access on the current standard plan, review the latest Managed Inference model catalog, attach model resources, make test inference calls, or review Heroku-managed AI model operations.

Agent profile for design motion systems, transitions, easing, reduced-motion behavior, and performance-safe animation. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.