Results for “proof-of-concept”

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

Claim-driven 实验设计：界定目标 claims → 设计实验块（baseline/validation/ablation/robustness）→ 构建执行顺序 → 可选 Review LLM review → 写入 wiki

Use when experiments complete to judge what claims the results support, what they don't, and what evidence is still missing. Codex MCP evaluates results against intended claims and routes to next action (pivot, supplement, or confirm). Use after experiments finish — before writing the paper or running ablations.

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

Use when creating or redesigning SaaS or AI product landing pages where a real workflow, interface, or deterministic demo is the central proof—pale atmospheric shells, product UI in the hero, prompt-to-output stories, audience tabs, compact feature modules, honest pricing, and FAQ handoffs.

Verifies that every number, comparison, and scope claim in a research paper matches raw result files, using a fresh cross-model reviewer with no prior context to prevent confirmation bias.