Plugins

2 plugins

Publish SEO-Optimized Article

Research, plan, write, and publish an SEO-optimized article with quality checks.

9 skills · plugin

Python Scripting

Low-context guidance for safe one-off Python helpers, typed scripts, lightweight quality checks, and zero-dependency macOS utilities.

4 skills · plugin

Results for “quality-check”

18 skills

Audit Langfuse LLM

Run a PDCA quality audit on LLM/AI features: traces, prompts, costs, evals, grounding, hallucination. Use for "audit LLM quality", "check Langfuse", "audit prompts", "check AI quality", "audit AI costs", "check traces". Jailbreak/OWASP LLM → audit-llm-security. Token caps → plan-llm-cost-guardrails.

Enforces a machine-readable behavioral contract for multi-agent development, mandating specification-first workflows, git checkpoints, context lineage, and quality gates.

construct-ai-primary

Output Validation Checklist

Use before delivering any work product to validate quality. This skill provides a standardized checklist that every agent must complete before marking work as done, ensuring consistent quality across all deliverables regardless of agent or company.

Validates agent outputs against schemas and quality criteria, scores confidence, detects hallucinations, monitors convergence, decides when to iterate, and synthesizes actionable feedback. Use when checking if a node's output is acceptable, scoring confidence, detecting fabricated content, deciding whether to re-execute, or generating improvement feedback. Activate on "validate output", "check quality", "confidence score", "hallucination check", "should we iterate", "improvement feedback". NOT for executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), planning DAGs (use dag-planner), or matching skills (use dag-skills-matcher).

Build evaluation frameworks for agent systems with deterministic checks, regression suites, multi-dimensional rubrics, quality gates, production monitoring, and outcome measurement.

16.9k · bundle

Credit Optimizer

Reduces AI API costs by 30-75% by classifying task complexity, checking prompt quality, and routing tasks to the most cost-efficient model tier before execution.

More results

Use this agent when you need to run linting and code quality checks on Ruby and ERB files. Run before pushing to origin.

Quality Playbook

Runs a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase, deriving behavioral requirements, generating spec-traced tests, performing multi-pass code review, and producing a consolidated bug report with verified patches.

36.2k · bundle

Quality Test Gate

Use `analysis-agent` to map acceptance to validation, `task-agent` to add or run bounded tests, and `review-agent` to assess proof coverage. Skip work with no material change or already-fresh complete validation.

Code Review And Quality

Conducts multi-axis code review across correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance before merging any change.

vvieira010-pixel

Assessment Validity Checker

Audit a proposed assessment for construct validity, reliability, and alignment to learning objectives. Use when reviewing or quality-assuring assessments before deployment.

Windags Evaluator

Two-stage review engine with four-layer quality model for the WinDAGs meta-DAG. Receives completed node outputs and produces ReviewResult containing QualityVector. Stage 1 (Haiku) checks Floor + Wall on every node. Stage 2 (Sonnet) runs Ceiling evaluation conditionally using economic escalation formula. Enforces BC-EVAL-001 through BC-EVAL-006. Activate when operating as the Evaluator role in the meta-DAG, when reviewing node outputs, when computing quality vectors, or when deciding Stage 2 escalation.

Dual Axis Skill Reviewer

Review AI agent skills using a dual-axis method: deterministic code-based checks and LLM deep review, with weighted scoring and improvement recommendations.

Squeeze Max Traffic

Post-draft pass that expands a drafted article to capture the FULL keyword family — keywords the page already or could rank for, plus the Ahrefs Content Gap (keywords competitors rank for but we don't) — by weaving the worthwhile ones in as natural added paragraphs/sections. NOT keyword stuffing. Triggered after /draft, before /quality-check.

Setup Evaluation

Validate process decomposition and architecture design quality before execution begins. Load when the setup-evaluator agent fires (automatic for agent-chain tasks), or when user says "evaluate this setup", "check the decomposition", "validate the architecture", "is this plan sound", "review the agent design". Catches structural errors, missing knowledge, unrealistic step ordering, and topology mismatches. Does NOT modify — only evaluates.

Audits natural-language programming artifacts such as SKILL.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, slash commands, plugin manifests, hooks, rules, and prompt files. Use when reviewing AI-agent repositories, checking manifest-vs-disk consistency, scoring skill or agent quality, adding NL artifact CI gates, or diagnosing vocabulary and version drift across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and Antigravity-style projects.

Route web-game auto-playtesting with WAI Play (waiterve/wai-play): decide whether the next move is a testability check, authoring or repairing the `GameFlowAgentAPI` bridge, running a real browser playtest, reading the five-dimension quality report, or unblocking a key node the agent cannot reach. Use when the user wants an AI agent to actually play their HTML5 / canvas / vibe-coded web game and return reproducible evidence, scores, and fix suggestions across the five supported types (survivor-like, arcade shooter, platformer, puzzle/card, visual novel). Triggers on: wai-play, WAI Play, auto-playtest, AI plays my game, web game testing agent, GameFlowAgentAPI, GameFlowIntegration, jumpToScenario, game quality score, playtest evidence. Route Unity/Unreal frame-time work to `game-performance-profiler`, engine build failures to `game-build-log-triage`, human playtest notes to `game-demo-feedback-triage`, and generic browser automation to `browser-harness`.

theycallmeholla

Sets up and audits the Claude Code harness for a project: CLAUDE.md, .claude/rules, skills, subagents, settings.json permissions, hooks, verification loop. Commands: kickoff (scaffold new setup), check-playbook (score an existing one), scouting-report (last scorecard), adjust (fix bloat/misplaced instructions), drill (turn advisory prose into real hooks/permissions/CI), decline (record an accepted risk), gameplan (work order with acceptance criteria before building), watch-film (check a diff against that order for scope creep/weakened tests/false claims). Use for setting up Claude Code, or on: "Claude ignores my CLAUDE.md", "it's huge and still misses things", "it said done but ran nothing", "it changed files I didn't ask about", "it weakened a test to pass", "rule, skill, or hook?", "is my setup any good". Not for code quality (code-audit), test coverage (test-assessment), one-off prompt wording (genie-proof-prompts), new skill authoring (skill-creator), or compacting a conversation (handoff).