Results for “sprint-retrospective”

Analyzes repeated agent failures or noisy routing and proposes evidence-backed changes to instructions, skills, gates, or runbooks.

Wrap a learning session in a plan → monitor → reflect cycle. Use at the start of any substantial study session to set goals, mid-session to check strategy, and at session end to consolidate what changed. Builds self-regulated learning as a habit.

Design a spaced retrieval schedule for any topic list and timeline. Use when planning units, term sequences, or revision programmes.

Run a structured retrospective after development-phase runs of your product's agents — interview the owner in plain language about what went well and poorly, draft ranked improvement hypotheses, then design and run small n=1/n=2 experiments with pre-declared success criteria, guardrails, stop conditions, and a cost/ROI kill-switch. Load when the user says how did that run go, retro this run, the agent output was bad, what should we improve, draft hypotheses, run a small experiment, or after repeated dev runs of an agentic system produce uneven quality. Priority: output quality over performance over cost, each with diminishing-returns stops. NOT a product A/B test (experimentation), NOT coding-agent harness repair (harness-evolution), NOT production-scale learning (runtime-learning-loop).

当用户想测试或复盘某个 skill 的实际执行效果时使用——如“测一下这个 skill”“看看 agent 是否按 skill 执行”“生成 skill 覆盖率或溯源报告”。在隔离沙箱中发起一次 headless 盲测，逐步骤溯源并产出中文复盘报告。不要用于编写新 skill、调试业务代码、代码审查，或复盘当前会话已经发生的执行。

Team lead agent — sprint planning, standups, velocity, impediments, team health

Create or enrich a pursuit capture brief from USASpending bulk data, optional SAM live intel, and optional LLM narrative. Use when opening a recompete workspace, scaffolding admin paperwork, or when the user asks for a one-page pursuit snapshot with citations.